| Table of Contents | ||
|---|---|---|
|
...
In summary, a Capability in Orthogramic is not merely a function or a static entity; it is a living, evolving component of the business architecture that adapts in real-time to support the organization’s strategic goals. Unlike BIZBOK, which often relies on manual updates and a framework-centric approach, Orthogramic’s data-driven, automated methodology allows for continuous evolution and alignment. By democratizing access to Capability management, integrating performance metrics, and providing predictive insights, Orthogramic empowers organizations to navigate complexity with agility and precision. This modern approach ensures that Capabilities are not only well-defined but also strategically aligned, making Orthogramic a vital tool for businesses seeking to thrive in a dynamic environment.
Capability details
Each Capability Detail page delves into the specific functional and technical capabilities of the organization. It highlights key strengths and identifies opportunities for improvement. It is reached within Orthogramic from Business Architecture > Capability.
...
| Info |
|---|
Relationship of Domain, Attributes, Elements and Sub-ElementsTo understand the Relationship of Domain, Attributes, Elements and Sub-Elements, see: https://orthogramic.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/OM/pages/245137488/Domain+Attributes+Elements#The-relationships-between-Business-Architecture-Domains%2C-Attributes%2C-Elements-and-Sub-Elements |
Capability attributes
Domain | Attribute | Description | Example |
capabilities | Title | The name or title of the Capability | Automated Track Inspection System |
capabilities | Description | A detailed explanation of what the Capability entails | AI-enabled system for continuous track geometry measurement and defect detection |
capabilities | Purpose | The intended purpose or function of the Capability within the Organization | Enhance track inspection efficiency and accuracy |
capabilities | Owner | The individual or team responsible for the Capability | Chief of Track Inspection Technology |
capabilities | orgUnitTitle | The Organization unit(s) to which the Capability is linked | Track and Rail Infrastructure Division |
capabilities | Inputs | The resources information or materials required for the Capability to function | Track geometry data, rail wear measurements, historical defect data |
capabilities | Outputs | The deliverables or results produced by the Capability | Daily inspection reports, defect predictions, maintenance recommendations |
capabilities | Processes | The set of processes that define how the Capability operates | Data collection, analysis, defect identification, reporting |
capabilities | Performance Indicators | Metrics used to measure the effectiveness and efficiency of the Capability | Detection accuracy: 96.5%, False alarm rate: 2.3% |
capabilities | Dependencies | Other capabilities processes or systems that the Capability depends on | GPS systems, data transmission network, analysis software |
capabilities | Related Capabilities | Capabilities that are related or linked to this Capability | Rail flaw detection, bridge inspection systems |
capabilities | Maturity Level | The current maturity level of the Capability | Level 4 - Advanced Implementation |
capabilities | Tools and Technologies | Tools and technologies used to support or enable the Capability | LIDAR sensors, machine learning models, track geometry cars |
capabilities | Compliance and Standards | Regulatory requirements and standards the Capability must adhere to | 49 CFR Part 213, FRA Track Safety Standards |
capabilities | Cost | The financial cost associated with implementing and maintaining the Capability | Annual operating cost: $12.8M |
capabilities | Risks | Potential risks associated with the Capability and its operations | Equipment failure, data accuracy issues |
capabilities | Improvement Opportunities | Areas where the Capability can be enhanced or improved | Integrate thermal imaging, expand coverage to secondary lines |
capabilities | Strategic Alignment | How the Capability aligns with the Organizations strategic goals and objectives | Supports accident reduction and efficiency goals |
capabilities | Parent | A high-level Capability that encompasses multiple sub-capabilities or child capabilities | Track Safety Assurance System |
capabilities | Child | A specific Capability that falls under a broader parent Capability | Rail Profile Measurement |
capabilities | Child Process | A detailed process that supports a child Capability | Continuous rail wear monitoring |
Capability Function Element
Element | Sub-Element | Description | Example |
capabilityFunction | Title | The name or title of the function | Track Geometry Measurement |
capabilityFunction | Description | A detailed explanation of what the function involves | Automated measurement of track geometry parameters |
capabilityFunction | Purpose | The intended purpose or function of the activity | Ensure compliance with FRA track geometry standards |
capabilityFunction | Owner | The individual or team responsible for the function | Track Geometry Program Manager |
capabilityFunction | orgUnitTitle | The Organization unit(s) where the function resides | Track Inspection Division |
capabilityFunction | Inputs | The inputs required to perform the function | Raw sensor data, track class information |
capabilityFunction | Outputs | The outputs or deliverables produced by the function | Geometry exception reports, maintenance alerts |
capabilityFunction | Processes | The processes involved in the function | Data collection, analysis, reporting, validation |
Capability Components Element
Element | Sub-Element | Description | Example |
capabilityComponent | Title | The name or title of the Capability component | Rail Wear Detection System |
capabilityComponent | Description | A detailed explanation of what the Capability component involves | Automated measurement of rail head wear and profile |
capabilityComponent | Purpose | The intended purpose or benefit of the Capability component | Monitor rail degradation and predict maintenance needs |
capabilityComponent | Owner | The individual or team responsible for the Capability component | Rail Integrity Program Lead |
capabilityComponent | orgUnitTitle | The Organization unit(s) utilizing the Capability component | Track Maintenance Division |
capabilityComponent | Technologies | The technologies and tools used for the Capability component | Laser profilers, ultrasonic sensors, analysis software |
capabilityComponent | Processes | The processes involved in the Capability component | Data collection, wear analysis, reporting |
capabilityComponent | Skills | The skills and competencies required for the Capability component | Rail inspection certification, data analysis expertise |
Capability Process Element
Element | Sub-Element | Description | Example |
capabilityProcess | Title | The name or title of the Process | Track Inspection and Assessment Process |
capabilityProcess | Description | A detailed explanation of what the Process entails | Standardized procedure for conducting comprehensive track inspections and safety assessments |
capabilityProcess | Purpose | The intended purpose or function of the Process | Ensure systematic evaluation of track conditions to maintain FRA safety standards |
capabilityProcess | Owner | The individual or team responsible for the Process | Chief Track Inspector |
capabilityProcess | orgUnitTitle | The Organization unit(s) where the Process resides | Track Safety Division |
capabilityProcess | Parent Capability | The Capability this Process supports | Track Safety Assurance System |
capabilityProcess | Inputs | The inputs required to perform the Process | Track class specifications, Previous inspection data, Maintenance history |
capabilityProcess | Outputs | The outputs or deliverables produced by the Process | Inspection reports, Defect notifications, Maintenance recommendations |
capabilityProcess | Steps | Detailed steps involved in the Process |
|
capabilityProcess | Performance Metrics | Metrics used to measure Process effectiveness | Inspection completion rate: 98%, Defect identification accuracy: 96% |
capabilityProcess | Compliance Requirements | Regulatory requirements governing the Process | 49 CFR Part 213 - Track Safety Standards |
capabilityProcess | Tools Required | Tools and equipment needed for the Process | Track geometry car, Gauge measurement devices, Digital inspection tablets |
...