...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
| style | none |
|---|
Introduction
The Capability domain in Orthogramic defines the core functions and abilities that enable your organization to achieve its strategic objectives. Each Capability is linked to other business architecture domains like Value Streams, Products, and Stakeholders, providing a clear view of how your organization operates and delivers value. Orthogramic's data-driven approach allows you to continuously assess and evolve Capabilities, ensuring they remain aligned with changing business needs and market dynamics. Discover how the Capability domain helps you optimize organizational performance and strategic alignment.
What is a Capability in Orthogramic?
...
What is a Capability?
The Capabilities domain represents core functions and competencies an organization must develop and maintain to deliver value and achieve strategic objectives. It provides a structured view of what an organization can do, independent of processes, systems, or people.
Capabilities act as a bridge between strategy and execution, enabling organizations to align their goals with day-to-day operations. The Capability domain presents a dynamic, real-time perspective that adapts as an organization evolves. This adaptability makes it easier for businesses to respond to rapid changes in market conditions and strategic priorities, emphasizing continuous alignment with business objectives.
The approach to Capabilities is deeply integrated with other business architecture domains, including Strategy, Value Streams, Information, Stakeholders, and more. Each Capability is not seen in isolation but is interconnected with various attributes, sub-elements, and dependencies that define its role within the organization. This interconnectedness provides a richer, more comprehensive understanding of how Capabilities contribute to the overall business architecture.
Data analytics, machine learning, and AI support continuous assessment and updates of Capabilities, ensuring they remain aligned with strategic objectives. This data-driven approach enables informed decisions based on the most up-to-date information, enhancing organizational agility.
Real-time data allows for a dynamic understanding of performance metrics associated with each Capability. These metrics are integrated into every aspect of Capability management, providing a continuous feedback loop that helps organizations monitor progress and adjust strategies accordingly. This supports more agile decision-making, as stakeholders can quickly identify gaps, assess the impact of changes, and adjust resources to optimize outcomes.
Capabilities are designed to be user-friendly and accessible to a broader audience within an organization. They can be explored, adjusted, and managed by a wide range of users, from HR and operations to strategy and IT teams. This inclusivity fosters greater collaboration across departments, leading to a more cohesive and unified organizational strategy.
Predictive insights into Capability evolution can forecast potential changes in a Capability's relevance or importance based on market trends, internal performance data, and external factors. This proactive approach helps organizations stay ahead of industry trends, positioning them for success in a rapidly changing business landscape.
The relationships between Capabilities and other business architecture domains are a crucial feature. Each Capability is associated with specific attributes, elements, and sub-elements that define its scope and impact. This holistic perspective makes it easier to identify synergies between Capabilities, streamline processes, and eliminate redundancies, leading to more efficient operations and better strategic alignment.
Capability Ownership and Usage
A single capability may be owned by one unit and utilised or consumed by others. See https://orthogramic.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/OM/pages/285016368 for standardised role definitions and usage patterns.
Info
Relationship of Domain, Attributes, Elements and Sub-Elements
To understand the Relationship of Domain, Attributes, Elements and Sub-Elements, see: https://orthogramic.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/OM/pages/245137488/Domain+Attributes+Elements?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWYyMjRjYzk3MzNjNDQxNWE4NjJlZjU1NmI1ZDg5NTEiLCJwIjoiYyJ9 of resources, technology, and processes to achieve desired outcomes. The domain incorporates data analytics for continuous assessment and predictive insights into capability evolution, forecasting potential changes based on market trends and internal data.Capability domain attributes
Attribute | Description | Example |
Title | The name or title of the Capability | Automated Track Inspection System |
Description | A detailed explanation of what the Capability entails | AI-enabled system for continuous track geometry measurement and defect detection |
Purpose | The intended purpose or function of the Capability within the Organization | Enhance track inspection efficiency and accuracy |
Owner | The individual or team responsible for the Capability | Chief of Track Inspection Technology |
orgUnitTitle | The Organization unit(s) to which the Capability is linked | Track and Rail Infrastructure Division |
Inputs | The resources information or materials required for the Capability to function | Track geometry data, rail wear measurements, historical defect data |
Outputs | The deliverables or results produced by the Capability | Daily inspection reports, defect predictions, maintenance recommendations |
Processes | The set of processes that define how the Capability operates | Data collection, analysis, defect identification, reporting |
Performance Indicators | Metrics used to measure the effectiveness and efficiency of the Capability | Detection accuracy: 96.5%, False alarm rate: 2.3% |
Dependencies | Other capabilities processes or systems that the Capability depends on | GPS systems, data transmission network, analysis software |
Related Capabilities | Capabilities that are related or linked to this Capability | Rail flaw detection, bridge inspection systems |
Maturity Level | The current maturity level of the Capability | Level 4 - Advanced Implementation |
Tools and Technologies | Tools and technologies used to support or enable the Capability | LIDAR sensors, machine learning models, track geometry cars |
Compliance and Standards | Regulatory requirements and standards the Capability must adhere to | 49 CFR Part 213, FRA Track Safety Standards |
Cost | The financial cost associated with implementing and maintaining the Capability | Annual operating cost: $12.8M |
Risks | Potential risks associated with the Capability and its operations | Equipment failure, data accuracy issues |
Improvement Opportunities | Areas where the Capability can be enhanced or improved | Integrate thermal imaging, expand coverage to secondary lines |
Strategic Alignment | How the Capability aligns with the Organizations strategic goals and objectives | Supports accident reduction and efficiency goals |
Parent | A high-level Capability that encompasses multiple sub-capabilities or child capabilities | Track Safety Assurance System |
Child | A specific Capability that falls under a broader parent Capability | Rail Profile Measurement |
Child Process | A detailed process that supports a child Capability | Continuous rail wear monitoring |
Capability Function Element
Sub-Element | Description | Example |
Title | The name or title of the function | Track Geometry Measurement |
Description | A detailed explanation of what the function involves | Automated measurement of track geometry parameters |
Purpose | The intended purpose or function of the activity | Ensure compliance with FRA track geometry standards |
Owner | The individual or team responsible for the function | Track Geometry Program Manager |
orgUnitTitle | The Organization unit(s) where the function resides | Track Inspection Division |
Inputs | The inputs required to perform the function | Raw sensor data, track class information |
Outputs | The outputs or deliverables produced by the function | Geometry exception reports, maintenance alerts |
Processes | The processes involved in the function | Data collection, analysis, reporting, validation |
Capability Components Element
Sub-Element | Description | Example |
Title | The name or title of the Capability component | Rail Wear Detection System |
Description | A detailed explanation of what the Capability component involves | Automated measurement of rail head wear and profile |
Purpose | The intended purpose or benefit of the Capability component | Monitor rail degradation and predict maintenance needs |
Owner | The individual or team responsible for the Capability component | Rail Integrity Program Lead |
orgUnitTitle | The Organization unit(s) utilizing the Capability component | Track Maintenance Division |
Technologies | The technologies and tools used for the Capability component | Laser profilers, ultrasonic sensors, analysis software |
Processes | The processes involved in the Capability component | Data collection, wear analysis, reporting |
Skills | The skills and competencies required for the Capability component | Rail inspection certification, data analysis expertise |
Capability Process Element
Sub-Element | Description | Example |
Title | The name or title of the Process | Track Inspection and Assessment Process |
Description | A detailed explanation of what the Process entails | Standardized procedure for conducting comprehensive track inspections and safety assessments |
Purpose | The intended purpose or function of the Process | Ensure systematic evaluation of track conditions to maintain FRA safety standards |
Owner | The individual or team responsible for the Process | Chief Track Inspector |
orgUnitTitle | The Organization unit(s) where the Process resides | Track Safety Division |
Parent Capability | The Capability this Process supports | Track Safety Assurance System |
Inputs | The inputs required to perform the Process | Track class specifications, Previous inspection data, Maintenance history |
Outputs | The outputs or deliverables produced by the Process | Inspection reports, Defect notifications, Maintenance recommendations |
Steps | Detailed steps involved in the Process |
|
Performance Metrics | Metrics used to measure Process effectiveness | Inspection completion rate: 98%, Defect identification accuracy: 96% |
Compliance Requirements | Regulatory requirements governing the Process | 49 CFR Part 213 - Track Safety Standards |
Tools Required | Tools and equipment needed for the Process | Track geometry car, Gauge measurement devices, Digital inspection tablets |
...