Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Table of Contents
stylenone

...

Introduction

The Capability domain in Orthogramic defines the core functions and abilities that enable your organization to achieve its strategic objectives. Each Capability is linked to other business architecture domains like Value Streams, Products, and Stakeholders, providing a clear view of how your organization operates and delivers value. Orthogramic's data-driven approach allows you to continuously assess and evolve Capabilities, ensuring they remain aligned with changing business needs and market dynamics. Discover how the Capability domain helps you optimize organizational performance and strategic alignment.

What is a Capability in Orthogramic?

In Orthogramic, a Capability is a core organizational function that serves as a bridge between strategy and execution, enabling organizations to align their goals with day-to-day operations. Unlike traditional frameworks such as BIZBOK, which offer a more static and rigid approach to Capability management, Orthogramic presents a dynamic, real-time perspective that adapts as an organization evolves. This adaptability makes it easier for businesses to respond to rapid changes in market conditions and strategic priorities, emphasizing continuous alignment with business objectives.

Orthogramic’s Orthogramic's approach to Capabilities is deeply integrated with other business architecture domains, including Strategy, Value Streams, Information, Stakeholders, and more. Each Capability is not seen in isolation but is interconnected with various attributes, sub-elements, and dependencies that define its role within the organization. This interconnectedness provides a richer, more comprehensive understanding of how Capabilities contribute to the overall business architecture. By embedding these relationships within the platform, Orthogramic allows organizations to see not just what a Capability is but how it functions within a larger ecosystem of business elements.

One of the key differences between Orthogramic and BIZBOK is how data is managed and updated. In BIZBOK, Capabilities are often manually documented, requiring significant effort to maintain accuracy and relevance as business needs shift. This can lead to delays and outdated information, hindering quick decision-making. In contrast, Orthogramic leverages automation to keep Capabilities current. Using advanced data analytics, machine learning, and AI, the platform continuously assesses and updates Capabilities, ensuring they remain aligned with strategic objectives. This data-driven approach enables users to make informed decisions based on the most up-to-date information, enhancing organizational agility.

Orthogramic’s The platform's emphasis on real-time data allows for a more dynamic understanding of performance metrics associated with each Capability. These metrics are integrated into every aspect of Capability management, providing a continuous feedback loop that helps organizations monitor progress and adjust strategies accordingly. Unlike BIZBOK, which typically treats performance as a separate consideration, Orthogramic embeds performance indicators directly into the Capability model, allowing for immediate insights into how well a Capability is contributing to overall business goals. This shift supports more agile decision-making, as stakeholders can quickly identify gaps, assess the impact of changes, and adjust resources to optimize outcomes.

Furthermore, Orthogramic’s Orthogramic's Capabilities are designed to be user-friendly and accessible to a broader audience within an organization, not just specialized business architects. This democratization of business architecture is a significant departure from BIZBOK, which often caters primarily to professionals with deep expertise in the field. In Orthogramic, capabilities . Capabilities can be explored, adjusted, and managed by a wide range of users, from HR and operations to strategy and IT teams. This inclusivity fosters greater collaboration across departments, leading to a more cohesive and unified organizational strategy.

Orthogramic also goes beyond BIZBOK by providing The platform also provides predictive insights into Capability evolution. Using AI and machine learning, the platform it can forecast potential changes in a Capability’s Capability's relevance or importance based on market trends, internal performance data, and external factors. This proactive approach contrasts with BIZBOK’s more retrospective methodology, which focuses heavily on documenting past and present states without the same emphasis on predicting future scenarios. Orthogramic’s predictive capabilities help helps organizations stay ahead of industry trends, positioning them for success in a rapidly changing business landscape.

The relationships between Capabilities and other business architecture domains are a crucial feature in Orthogramic. Each Capability is associated with specific attributes, elements, and sub-elements that define its scope and impact. For example, a Capability might be linked to particular processes, technologies, or resources, each with its own set of dependencies and implications for the organization. Orthogramic captures these details, synthesizing them into a comprehensive view that allows decision-makers to understand the full context of any Capability. This holistic perspective makes it easier to identify synergies between Capabilities, streamline processes, and eliminate redundancies, leading to more efficient operations and better strategic alignment.In summary, a Capability in Orthogramic is not merely a function or a static entity; it is a living, evolving component of the business architecture that adapts in real-time to support the organization’s strategic goals. Unlike BIZBOK, which often relies on manual updates and a framework-centric approach, Orthogramic’s data-driven, automated methodology allows for continuous evolution and alignment. By democratizing access to Capability management, integrating performance metrics, and providing predictive insights, Orthogramic empowers organizations to navigate complexity with agility and precision. This modern approach ensures that Capabilities are not only well-defined but also strategically aligned, making Orthogramic a vital tool for businesses seeking to thrive in a dynamic environment.

Capability Ownership and Usage

A single capability may be owned by one unit and utilised or consumed by others. See Inter-unit domain relationships https://orthogramic.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/OM/pages/285016368 for standardised role definitions and usage patterns.

Info

Relationship of Domain, Attributes, Elements and Sub-Elements

To understand the Relationship of Domain, Attributes, Elements and Sub-Elements, see: https://orthogramic.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/OM/pages/245137488/Domain+Attributes+Elements?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWYyMjRjYzk3MzNjNDQxNWE4NjJlZjU1NmI1ZDg5NTEiLCJwIjoiYyJ9

Capability domain attributes

...

capabilities

Attribute

Description

Example

Title

The name or title of the Capability

Automated Track Inspection Systemcapabilities

Description

A detailed explanation of what the Capability entails

AI-enabled system for continuous track geometry measurement and defect detectioncapabilities

Purpose

The intended purpose or function of the Capability within the Organization

Enhance track inspection efficiency and accuracycapabilities

Owner

The individual or team responsible for the Capability

Chief of Track Inspection Technologycapabilities

orgUnitTitle

The Organization unit(s) to which the Capability is linked

Track and Rail Infrastructure Division

capabilities

Inputs

The resources information or materials required for the Capability to function

Track geometry data, rail wear measurements, historical defect data

capabilities

Outputs

The deliverables or results produced by the Capability

Daily inspection reports, defect predictions, maintenance recommendationscapabilities

Processes

The set of processes that define how the Capability operates

Data collection, analysis, defect identification, reportingcapabilities

Performance Indicators

Metrics used to measure the effectiveness and efficiency of the Capability

Detection accuracy: 96.5%, False alarm rate: 2.3%

capabilities

Dependencies

Other capabilities processes or systems that the Capability depends on

GPS systems, data transmission network, analysis softwarecapabilities

Related Capabilities

Capabilities that are related or linked to this Capability

Rail flaw detection, bridge inspection systemscapabilities

Maturity Level

The current maturity level of the Capability

Level 4 - Advanced Implementationcapabilities

Tools and Technologies

Tools and technologies used to support or enable the Capability

LIDAR sensors, machine learning models, track geometry carscapabilities

Compliance and Standards

Regulatory requirements and standards the Capability must adhere to

49 CFR Part 213, FRA Track Safety Standardscapabilities

Cost

The financial cost associated with implementing and maintaining the Capability

Annual operating cost: $12.8M

capabilities

Risks

Potential risks associated with the Capability and its operations

Equipment failure, data accuracy issuescapabilities

Improvement Opportunities

Areas where the Capability can be enhanced or improved

Integrate thermal imaging, expand coverage to secondary linescapabilities

Strategic Alignment

How the Capability aligns with the Organizations strategic goals and objectives

Supports accident reduction and efficiency goalscapabilities

Parent

A high-level Capability that encompasses multiple sub-capabilities or child capabilities

Track Safety Assurance Systemcapabilities

Child

A specific Capability that falls under a broader parent Capability

Rail Profile Measurementcapabilities

Child Process

A detailed process that supports a child Capability

Continuous rail wear monitoring

Capability Function Element Element

capabilityFunction

Sub-Element

Description

Example

Title

The name or title of the function

Track Geometry MeasurementcapabilityFunction

Description

A detailed explanation of what the function involves

Automated measurement of track geometry parameterscapabilityFunction

Purpose

The intended purpose or function of the activity

Ensure compliance with FRA track geometry standardscapabilityFunction

Owner

The individual or team responsible for the function

Track Geometry Program ManagercapabilityFunction

orgUnitTitle

The Organization unit(s) where the function resides

Track Inspection DivisioncapabilityFunction

Inputs

The inputs required to perform the function

Raw sensor data, track class informationcapabilityFunction

Outputs

The outputs or deliverables produced by the function

Geometry exception reports, maintenance alerts

capabilityFunction

Processes

The processes involved in the function

Data collection, analysis, reporting, validation

Capability Components Element

Element

Sub-Element

Description

Example

capabilityComponent

Title

The name or title of the Capability component

Rail Wear Detection SystemcapabilityComponent

Description

A detailed explanation of what the Capability component involves

Automated measurement of rail head wear and profile

capabilityComponent

Purpose

The intended purpose or benefit of the Capability component

Monitor rail degradation and predict maintenance needs

capabilityComponent

Owner

The individual or team responsible for the Capability component

Rail Integrity Program LeadcapabilityComponent

orgUnitTitle

The Organization unit(s) utilizing the Capability component

Track Maintenance DivisioncapabilityComponent

Technologies

The technologies and tools used for the Capability component

Laser profilers, ultrasonic sensors, analysis softwarecapabilityComponent

Processes

The processes involved in the Capability component

Data collection, wear analysis, reportingcapabilityComponent

Skills

The skills and competencies required for the Capability component

Rail inspection certification, data analysis expertise

Capability Process Element

Element

Sub-Element

Description

Example

capabilityProcess

Title

The name or title of the Process

Track Inspection and Assessment ProcesscapabilityProcess

Description

A detailed explanation of what the Process entails

Standardized procedure for conducting comprehensive track inspections and safety assessmentscapabilityProcess

Purpose

The intended purpose or function of the Process

Ensure systematic evaluation of track conditions to maintain FRA safety standardscapabilityProcess

Owner

The individual or team responsible for the Process

Chief Track InspectorcapabilityProcess

orgUnitTitle

The Organization unit(s) where the Process resides

Track Safety DivisioncapabilityProcess

Parent Capability

The Capability this Process supports

Track Safety Assurance SystemcapabilityProcess

Inputs

The inputs required to perform the Process

Track class specifications, Previous inspection data, Maintenance historycapabilityProcess

Outputs

The outputs or deliverables produced by the Process

Inspection reports, Defect notifications, Maintenance recommendationscapabilityProcess

Steps

Detailed steps involved in the Process

  1. Pre-inspection preparation, 2. Visual track examination, 3. Geometry measurement, 4. Defect documentation, 5. Risk assessment

capabilityProcess

Performance Metrics

Metrics used to measure Process effectiveness

Inspection completion rate: 98%, Defect identification accuracy: 96%capabilityProcess

Compliance Requirements

Regulatory requirements governing the Process

49 CFR Part 213 - Track Safety StandardscapabilityProcess

Tools Required

Tools and equipment needed for the Process

Track geometry car, Gauge measurement devices, Digital inspection tablets

...