...
Code Block |
---|
{ "supplyChainID": "SC-MFG-001", "title": "Global Electronics Manufacturing Supply Chain", "description": "End-to-end supply chain for consumer electronics manufacturing, including component sourcing, assembly operations, distribution networks, and aftermarket service fulfillment.", "supplyChainCategory": "manufacturing", "orgUnitTitle": "Global Supply Chain Management", "orgUnitRoles": ["Chief Supply Chain Officer", "Director of Global Sourcing", "Logistics Operations Manager"], "supplyChainScope": "enterprise", "geographicCoverage": { "regions": ["North America", "Europe", "Asia-Pacific", "Southeast Asia"], "countries": ["United States", "China", "Vietnam", "Germany", "Malaysia", "Mexico"], "coverageType": "global", "expansionPlans": "Evaluating new manufacturing hub in Eastern Europe by 2026" }, "locationStrategy": { "strategyType": "proximity-to-supply", "strategyDescription": "Primary manufacturing facilities positioned near key semiconductor and component suppliers with regional distribution centers close to major markets", "evaluationCriteria": ["Supplier ecosystem density", "Labor expertise", "Logistics infrastructure", "Tax incentives"] }, "leadTime": { "endToEndLeadTime": "45-60 days", "componentLeadTimes": [ { "componentName": "Semiconductor procurement", "duration": "30-45 days", "variability": "High - affected by global shortages" }, { "componentName": "Final assembly", "duration": "7 days", "variability": "Low" }, { "componentName": "Distribution to regional centers", "duration": "5-10 days", "variability": "Medium - affected by port congestion" } ], "leadTimeReliability": "72% on-time delivery to commitment dates", "improvementTargets": "Reduce end-to-end lead time to 35 days by Q4 2026" }, "volumeCapacity": { "normalCapacity": "1.2 million units per month", "peakCapacity": "1.5 million units per month", "unitOfMeasure": "Finished device units", "utilizationRate": "83% average utilization", "capacityConstraints": ["Semiconductor availability", "Skilled labor in Vietnam facility", "Q4 shipping capacity"], "expansionPlans": "15% capacity increase planned for Vietnam facility in 2026" }, "costStructure": { "totalCost": "$425M annual supply chain operational cost", "costComponents": [ { "componentName": "Materials and components", "amount": "$312M", "percentage": 73.4 }, { "componentName": "Manufacturing labor", "amount": "$48M", "percentage": 11.3 }, { "componentName": "Logistics and transportation", "amount": "$36M", "percentage": 8.5 }, { "componentName": "Warehousing and inventory", "amount": "$19M", "percentage": 4.5 }, { "componentName": "Supply chain management", "amount": "$10M", "percentage": 2.3 } ], "costTrends": "Component costs decreasing 3% annually, logistics costs increasing 7% annually", "costReductionTargets": "8% total cost reduction target over next 24 months" }, "flexibilityRating": { "overallRating": "moderate", "volumeFlexibility": "high", "mixFlexibility": "moderate", "newProductFlexibility": "low", "improvementFocus": "Enhancing new product introduction capabilities through modular manufacturing processes" }, "resilienceRating": { "overallRating": "moderate", "redundancyLevel": "low", "diversificationLevel": "moderate", "visibilityLevel": "high", "recoveryCapability": "moderate", "resilienceInvestments": ["Secondary supplier qualification program", "Regional inventory buffers", "Multi-modal transportation capability"] }, "riskProfile": { "overallRiskLevel": "high", "keyRiskFactors": [ { "factorName": "Semiconductor supply constraints", "riskLevel": "high", "mitigationApproach": "Long-term contracts, strategic inventory, supplier diversification" }, { "factorName": "Geopolitical disruption in Asia", "riskLevel": "high", "mitigationApproach": "Manufacturing footprint diversification, scenario planning" }, { "factorName": "Ocean freight capacity and pricing volatility", "riskLevel": "moderate", "mitigationApproach": "Multi-modal options, contract diversification, selective air freight" } ], "riskMonitoringApproach": "Monthly risk review with quarterly simulation and mitigation updates" }, "sustainabilityRating": { "overallRating": "moderate", "carbonFootprint": "187,000 metric tons CO2e annually", "wasteReduction": "72% manufacturing waste diverted from landfill", "socialResponsibility": "Tier 1 suppliers 100% audited for labor practices", "sustainabilityInitiatives": ["Renewable energy transition at owned facilities", "Packaging redesign program", "Scope 3 emissions tracking implementation"], "sustainabilityReporting": "Annual sustainability report with science-based targets" }, "environmentalImpact": { "carbonEmissions": "187,000 metric tons CO2e annually", "waterUsage": "450 million gallons annually", "wasteGeneration": "5,200 tons annually", "resourceConsumption": "Critical minerals: 860 tons annually", "environmentalCompliance": "100% compliance with regulated standards, 85% compliance with voluntary standards", "reductionTargets": ["30% carbon reduction by 2028", "20% water reduction by 2027", "Zero waste to landfill by 2029"] }, "qualityMetrics": [ { "metricName": "First Pass Yield", "metricDescription": "Percentage of units passing quality testing on first attempt", "currentValue": "94.6%", "targetValue": "97%", "trend": "improving" }, { "metricName": "Defect Rate", "metricDescription": "Defects per million opportunities", "currentValue": "350 DPMO", "targetValue": "200 DPMO", "trend": "improving" }, { "metricName": "Customer Return Rate", "metricDescription": "Percentage of shipped products returned due to quality issues", "currentValue": "1.8%", "targetValue": "1.0%", "trend": "stable" } ], "technologyEnablers": [ { "technologyName": "Supply Chain Control Tower", "technologyPurpose": "End-to-end visibility and exception management", "implementationStatus": "operational", "businessImpact": "45% reduction in supply disruption resolution time" }, { "technologyName": "Digital Twin Simulation", "technologyPurpose": "Network design and scenario planning", "implementationStatus": "implementing", "businessImpact": "Expected 12% improvement in network efficiency" }, { "technologyName": "Machine Learning Demand Forecasting", "technologyPurpose": "Improved demand prediction accuracy", "implementationStatus": "operational", "businessImpact": "18% reduction in forecast error" } ], "digitalMaturity": { "overallMaturity": "defined", "dataVisibility": "advanced", "processAutomation": "developing", "advancedAnalytics": "defined", "digitalRoadmap": "Digital supply chain transformation program with focus on process automation and predictive analytics through 2027" }, "maturityLevel": { "overallMaturity": "defined", "processMaturity": "managed", "performanceManagement": "defined", "maturityAssessmentDate": "2025-02-15" }, "improvementOpportunities": [ { "opportunityName": "Supplier Collaboration Platform", "opportunityDescription": "Implementation of real-time collaboration tools for design and planning with key suppliers", "potentialImpact": "high", "implementationComplexity": "medium", "status": "planning" }, { "opportunityName": "New Product Introduction Process Redesign", "opportunityDescription": "Streamlining of supply chain integration in NPI to reduce time-to-market", "potentialImpact": "high", "implementationComplexity": "high", "status": "evaluating" }, { "opportunityName": "Logistics Network Optimization", "opportunityDescription": "Comprehensive review and redesign of global distribution network", "potentialImpact": "medium", "implementationComplexity": "high", "status": "planning" } ], "strategicImportance": { "importanceLevel": "critical", "strategicContribution": "Supply chain capabilities are central to product availability, cost competitiveness, and sustainability goals", "alignmentWithObjectives": [ { "objectiveID": "SO-2025-02", "alignmentDescription": "Supply chain digitalization supports corporate digital transformation objective" }, { "objectiveID": "SO-2025-04", "alignmentDescription": "Sustainability initiatives in supply chain support corporate ESG objectives" } ] }, "competitiveAdvantage": { "advantageLevel": "advantage", "advantageSources": ["Advanced visibility technology", "Supplier relationship depth", "Multi-region manufacturing flexibility"], "competitiveBenchmarking": "Leading in technology adoption and visibility, lagging in new product flexibility compared to key competitors", "sustainabilityOfAdvantage": "Technology advantage requires ongoing investment, relationship advantage sustainable with continued engagement" }, "dependencies": [ { "dependencyType": "Critical", "domainType": "Capability", "entityID": "CAP-SC-003", "description": "Advanced procurement capability" }, { "dependencyType": "Important", "domainType": "Technology", "entityID": "TECH-007", "description": "Supply chain planning and control tower systems" } ], "relatedSupplyChainElements": [ { "elementID": "SC-MFG-002", "relationshipType": "upstream", "relationshipStrength": 4, "description": "Component supplier network for semiconductors" }, { "elementID": "SC-LOG-001", "relationshipType": "downstream", "relationshipStrength": 5, "description": "Global distribution network for finished goods" } ], "governanceModel": { "governanceStructure": "Cross-functional Supply Chain Leadership Council with regional representation", "decisionRights": "Network design decisions centralized, execution decisions regionalized", "performanceReviewProcess": "Monthly operational reviews, quarterly strategic reviews", "continuousImprovement": "Dedicated supply chain excellence team with agile improvement methodology" } } |
Supply Chain Domain Schema
Cross-Domain Relationship Mappings
Supply Chain-Strategy Relationship Schema
Code Block |
---|
{ "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#", "title": "Supply Chain-Strategy Relationship Schema", "description": "Schema for relationships between Supply Chain domain and Strategy domain", "type": "object", "required": ["relationshipID", "supplyChainID", "title", "relationshipType"], "properties": { "relationshipID": { "type": "string", "description": "Unique identifier for this relationship" }, "supplyChainID": { "type": "string", "description": "ID of the supply chain element" }, "title": { "type": "string", "description": "Name of the strategy" }, "relationshipType": { "type": "string", "description": "Nature of the supply chain influence on strategy", "enum": ["enabler", "constraint", "differentiator", "cost-driver", "risk-factor", "capability-builder", "collaborative-advantage", "other"] }, "relationshipStrength": { "type": "integer", "description": "Strength of influence (1-5)", "minimum": 1, "maximum": 5 }, "supplyChainFactors": { "type": "array", "description": "Supply chain factors influencing this strategy", "items": { "type": "string" } }, "strategicAlignment": { "type": "object", "description": "How supply chain aligns with strategy", "properties": { "alignmentDescription": { "type": "string", "description": "Description of alignment" }, "alignmentLevel": { "type": "string", "description": "Level of alignment", "enum": ["misaligned", "partially-aligned", "mostly-aligned", "fully-aligned"] }, "alignmentGaps": { "type": "array", "description": "Areas where alignment is lacking", "items": { "type": "string" } }, "alignmentPlan": { "type": "string", "description": "Plan to improve alignment" } } }, "strategicObjectives": { "type": "array", "description": "Strategic objectives affected by supply chain", "items": { "type": "object", "properties": { "objectiveID": { "type": "string", "description": "ID of strategic objective" }, "supplyChainContribution": { "type": "string", "description": "How supply chain contributes to objective" }, "importanceLevel": { "type": "string", "description": "Importance to objective", "enum": ["minor", "moderate", "significant", "critical"] } } } }, "competitivePositioning": { "type": "object", "description": "How supply chain affects competitive position", "properties": { "positioningRole": { "type": "string", "description": "Role in competitive positioning" }, "competitiveAdvantages": { "type": "array", "description": "Competitive advantages created", "items": { "type": "string" } }, "competitiveDisadvantages": { "type": "array", "description": "Competitive disadvantages created", "items": { "type": "string" } }, "benchmarking": { "type": "string", "description": "Comparison to competitors" } } }, "strategyConstraints": { "type": "array", "description": "Constraints imposed by supply chain", "items": { "type": "object", "properties": { "constraintDescription": { "type": "string", "description": "Description of constraint" }, "impactLevel": { "type": "string", "description": "Level of impact", "enum": ["minor", "moderate", "significant", "severe"] }, "mitigationApproach": { "type": "string", "description": "Approach to address constraint" } } } }, "strategicInvestments": { "type": "array", "description": "Strategic investments in supply chain", "items": { "type": "object", "properties": { "investmentName": { "type": "string", "description": "Name of investment" }, "investmentDescription": { "type": "string", "description": "Description of investment" }, "investmentRationale": { "type": "string", "description": "Strategic rationale" }, "expectedOutcomes": { "type": "string", "description": "Anticipated results" } } } }, "performanceMetrics": { "type": "array", "description": "Metrics for measuring strategic impact", "items": { "type": "object", "properties": { "metricName": { "type": "string", "description": "Name of metric" }, "metricDescription": { "type": "string", "description": "Description of what is measured" }, "currentValue": { "type": "string", "description": "Current performance" }, "targetValue": { "type": "string", "description": "Target performance" } } } } } } |
Supply Chain-Capability Relationship Schema
Code Block |
---|
{ "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#", "title": "Supply Chain-Capability Relationship Schema", "description": "Schema for relationships between Supply Chain domain and Capability domain", "type": "object", "required": ["relationshipID", "supplyChainID", "title", "relationshipType"], "properties": { "relationshipID": { "type": "string", "description": "Unique identifier for this relationship" }, "supplyChainID": { "type": "string", "description": "ID of the supply chain element" }, "title": { "type": "string", "description": "Name of the capability" }, "relationshipType": { "type": "string", "description": "Nature of the relationship", "enum": ["enabling", "supporting", "dependent", "enhancing", "limiting", "critical", "developing", "other"] }, "relationshipStrength": { "type": "integer", "description": "Importance of this relationship (1-5)", "minimum": 1, "maximum": 5 }, "capabilityContribution": { "type": "string", "description": "How capability contributes to supply chain" }, "capabilityRequirements": { "type": "array", "description": "Requirements the supply chain places on capability", "items": { "type": "object", "properties": { "requirementDescription": { "type": "string", "description": "Description of requirement" }, "importance": { "type": "string", "description": "Importance level", "enum": ["low", "medium", "high", "critical"] }, "fulfillmentLevel": { "type": "string", "description": "How well requirement is met", "enum": ["unmet", "partially-met", "mostly-met", "fully-met"] }, "improvementNeeds": { "type": "string", "description": "Areas needing improvement" } } } }, "capabilityMaturity": { "type": "object", "description": "Maturity of capability for supply chain needs", "properties": { "maturityLevel": { "type": "string", "description": "Current maturity assessment", "enum": ["initial", "developing", "defined", "managed", "optimizing"] }, "maturityGaps": { "type": "array", "description": "Key maturity gaps", "items": { "type": "string" } }, "maturityTargets": { "type": "string", "description": "Target maturity state" }, "developmentRoadmap": { "type": "string", "description": "Plan for capability development" } } }, "performanceMetrics": { "type": "array", "description": "Metrics for measuring capability contribution", "items": { "type": "object", "properties": { "metricName": { "type": "string", "description": "Name of metric" }, "metricDescription": { "type": "string", "description": "Description of what is measured" }, "currentValue": { "type": "string", "description": "Current performance" }, "targetValue": { "type": "string", "description": "Target performance" }, "impactOnSupplyChain": { "type": "string", "description": "How this metric affects supply chain" } } } }, "improvementInitiatives": { "type": "array", "description": "Initiatives to improve capability for supply chain", "items": { "type": "object", "properties": { "initiativeName": { "type": "string", "description": "Name of initiative" }, "initiativeDescription": { "type": "string", "description": "Description of initiative" }, "expectedBenefits": { "type": "string", "description": "Supply chain benefits expected" }, "status": { "type": "string", "description": "Current status", "enum": ["planned", "in-progress", "completed", "ongoing"] } } } }, "resourceAllocation": { "type": "object", "description": "Resources allocated to capability for supply chain", "properties": { "budgetAllocation": { "type": "string", "description": "Budget allocated" }, "personnelAllocation": { "type": "string", "description": "Personnel allocated" }, "technologyInvestment": { "type": "string", "description": "Technology investments" }, "allocationRationale": { "type": "string", "description": "Rationale for resource allocation" } } }, "governanceModel": { "type": "string", "description": "How capability is governed for supply chain needs" } } } |
Supply Chain Domain Schema Properties
Supply Chain Domain Attributes
Field | Type | Required | Description | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
| string | Yes | Unique identifier for the supply chain element | "SC-MFG-001" |
| string | Yes | The name or title of the supply chain element | "Global Electronics Manufacturing Supply Chain" |
| string | Yes | A detailed explanation of the supply chain element | "End-to-end supply chain for consumer electronics manufacturing, including component sourcing, assembly operations, distribution networks, and aftermarket service fulfillment." |
| string | Yes | Classification within supply network | "manufacturing" |
| string | Yes | The organization unit responsible for this supply chain element | "Global Supply Chain Management" |
| array of string | No | Specific roles within the organization unit that manage this supply chain element | ["Chief Supply Chain Officer", "Director of Global Sourcing"] |
| string | No | Organizational scope covered by this supply chain element | "enterprise" |
| object | No | Geographic span of the supply chain element | {"regions": ["North America", "Asia-Pacific"], "coverageType": "global"} |
| object | No | Approach to geographic positioning | {"strategyType": "proximity-to-supply", "strategyDescription": "Located near key suppliers"} |
| object | No | Time required for fulfillment | {"endToEndLeadTime": "45-60 days", "leadTimeReliability": "72%"} |
| object | No | Throughput capability | {"normalCapacity": "1.2 million units per month", "utilizationRate": "83%"} |
| object | No | Supply chain cost breakdown | {"totalCost": "$425M annual", "costComponents": [{...}]} |
| object | No | Adaptability to change | {"overallRating": "moderate", "volumeFlexibility": "high"} |
| object | No | Ability to withstand disruption | {"overallRating": "moderate", "redundancyLevel": "low"} |
| object | No | Supply chain risk characteristics | {"overallRiskLevel": "high", "keyRiskFactors": [{...}]} |
| object | No | Environmental and social performance | {"overallRating": "moderate", "carbonFootprint": "187,000 metric tons CO2e"} |
| object | No | Environmental effects of operations | {"carbonEmissions": "187,000 metric tons CO2e", "wasteGeneration": "5,200 tons"} |
| array of objects | No | Quality performance measures | [{"metricName": "First Pass Yield", "currentValue": "94.6%"}] |
| array of objects | No | Supporting technologies | [{"technologyName": "Supply Chain Control Tower", "businessImpact": "45% reduction"}] |
| object | No | Level of digital technology adoption | {"overallMaturity": "defined", "dataVisibility": "advanced"} |
| object | No | Current development stage | {"overallMaturity": "defined", "processMaturity": "managed"} |
| array of objects | No | Areas for enhancement | [{"opportunityName": "Supplier Collaboration Platform", "potentialImpact": "high"}] |
| object | No | Significance to business strategy | {"importanceLevel": "critical", "strategicContribution": "Central to product availability"} |
| object | No | How supply chain creates competitive advantage | {"advantageLevel": "advantage", "advantageSources": ["Advanced visibility technology"]} |
| array of objects | No | Other domains, processes, or systems supporting this supply chain element | [{"dependencyType": "Critical", "domainType": "Capability", "entityID": "CAP-SC-003"}] |
| array of objects | No | Other supply chain elements with relationships to this one | [{"elementID": "SC-MFG-002", "relationshipType": "upstream"}] |
| object | No | How the supply chain is governed | {"governanceStructure": "Cross-functional Supply Chain Leadership Council"} |
Supplier Network Element Schema
Field | Type | Required | Description | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
| string | Yes | Unique identifier for the supplier network | "SN-ELECT-001" |
| string | Yes | Name of the supplier network | "Electronics Component Supplier Network" |
| string | Yes | Detailed explanation of the supplier network | "Global network of semiconductor and electronic component suppliers" |
| string | Yes | The organization unit responsible for this supplier network | "Strategic Sourcing Department" |
| string | No | ID of the supply chain domain this network belongs to | "SC-MFG-001" |
| array of objects | No | Types of suppliers in the network | [{"categoryName": "Semiconductor Manufacturers", "spendPercentage": 45}] |
| array of objects | No | Hierarchical arrangement of suppliers | [{"tierLevel": "tier-1", "supplierCount": 38, "visibilityLevel": "full"}] |
| object | No | Geographic distribution of suppliers | {"regions": [{"regionName": "Asia-Pacific", "supplierCount": 64}]} |
| array of objects | No | Items with single source of supply | [{"itemName": "Custom ASIC", "criticality": "high"}] |
| array of objects | No | Strategically important suppliers | [{"supplierName": "TechSemi Inc.", "criticality": "very-high"}] |
| array of objects | No | Criteria for supplier selection | [{"criterionName": "Quality Certification", "weightingFactor": 25}] |
| array of objects | No | Metrics for measuring supplier performance | [{"metricName": "On-time Delivery", "targetValue": "98%"}] |
| array of objects | No | Types of supplier relationships | [{"relationshipType": "strategic", "supplierCount": 12}] |
| object | No | How the supplier network is governed | {"governanceStructure": "Quarterly performance review council"} |
| object | No | Risk characteristics of supplier network | {"overallRiskLevel": "high", "riskCategories": [{...}]} |
| object | No | Sustainability expectations for suppliers | {"environmentalRequirements": ["ISO 14001 certification"]} |
| object | No | Technology integration with suppliers | {"integrationLevel": "moderate", "integrationPlatforms": ["EDI", "Supplier Portal"]} |
| object | No | How collaboration with suppliers is structured | {"collaborationAreas": ["New product development", "Quality improvement"]} |
| object | No | Analysis of supplier spending | {"totalAnnualSpend": "$312M", "spendConcentration": "Top 10 suppliers represent 62% of spend"} |
| object | No | Management of supplier contracts | {"contractTypes": ["Long-term agreements", "Spot contracts"]} |
| array of objects | No | Initiatives to improve supplier network | [{"initiativeName": "Supplier Digital Enablement", "expectedBenefits": "Improved visibility and collaboration"}] |
Supply Chain Process Element Schema
Field | Type | Required | Description | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
| string | Yes | Unique identifier for the supply chain process | "SCP-S2P-001" |
| string | Yes | Name of the supply chain process | "Source-to-Pay Process" |
| string | Yes | Detailed explanation of the supply chain process | "End-to-end procurement process from supplier selection through payment" |
| string | Yes | The organization unit responsible for this process | "Procurement Operations" |
| string | No | ID of the supply chain domain this process belongs to | "SC-MFG-001" |
| string | No | Category of process | "sourcing" |
| string | No | Individual or role responsible for the process | "Director of Procurement Operations" |
| object | No | Boundaries of the process | {"startPoint": "Demand identification", "endPoint": "Supplier payment"} |
| array of objects | No | Key activities involved in the process | [{"stepID": "S2P-01", "stepName": "Requisition Creation", "sequenceNumber": 1}] |
| array of objects | No | Required inputs to the process | [{"inputName": "Approved Budget", "inputSource": "Finance Department"}] |
| array of objects | No | Resulting outputs from the process | [{"outputName": "Purchase Order", "outputDestination": "Supplier"}] |
| array of objects | No | Control mechanisms for the process | [{"controlName": "Approval Workflow", "controlType": "preventive"}] |
| array of objects | No | Related processes or dependencies | [{"dependencyID": "SCP-DEM-001", "dependencyType": "predecessor"}] |
| array of objects | No | Performance measures for the process | [{"metricName": "Purchase Order Cycle Time", "currentValue": "3.2 days"}] |
| array of objects | No | Specific risks related to this process | [{"riskName": "Unauthorized Purchases", "likelihood": "low", "impact": "moderate"}] |
| array of objects | No | Opportunities to improve the process | [{"opportunityName": "Touchless Processing", "potentialBenefits": "65% reduction in manual effort"}] |
| array of objects | No | Technologies supporting this process | [{"technologyName": "Procure-to-Pay System", "effectivenessAssessment": "effective"}] |
| object | No | Level of process automation | {"overallAutomation": "partially-automated", "automationByStep": [{...}]} |
| object | No | Level of process standardization | {"standardizationLevel": "mostly-standardized", "complianceLevel": "high"} |
| array of objects | No | Training needed for this process | [{"roleTitle": "Procurement Specialist", "trainingNeeds": ["System navigation", "Negotiation skills"]}] |
| object | No | Maturity assessment of the process | {"maturityLevel": "defined", "maturityAssessmentDate": "2025-02-15"} |
Logistics Network Element Schema
Field | Type | Required | Description | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
| string | Yes | Unique identifier for the logistics network | "LN-GLOBAL-001" |
| string | Yes | Name of the logistics network | "Global Distribution Network" |
| string | Yes | Detailed explanation of the logistics network | "Network of distribution centers and transportation links to deliver finished products to customers worldwide" |
| string | Yes | The organization unit responsible for this logistics network | "Global Logistics Operations" |
| string | No | ID of the supply chain domain this network belongs to | "SC-MFG-001" |
| string | No | Category of logistics network | "distribution" |
| array of objects | No | Key facilities and locations in the network | [{"nodeID": "DC-NA-001", "nodeName": "Memphis Distribution Center", "nodeType": "distribution-center"}] |
| array of objects | No | Connections between nodes in the network | [{"connectionID": "CONN-001", "sourceNodeID": "DC-NA-001", "transportationMode": "road"}] |
| array of objects | No | Methods of transport used in the network | [{"modeName": "ocean", "utilizationPercentage": 65, "costPercentage": 42}] |
| object | No | Throughput capabilities of the network | {"overallCapacity": "1.5M units monthly", "utilizationRate": "78%"} |
| array of objects | No | Performance standards for the network | [{"serviceName": "Standard Delivery", "performanceMetrics": [{...}]}] |
| object | No | Cost performance of the logistics network | {"totalLogisticsCost": "$36M annually", "costPerUnit": "$4.82"} |
| object | No | Environmental impact of the logistics network | {"totalCarbonEmissions": "76,000 metric tons CO2e annually"} |
| object | No | Adaptability of the logistics network to change | {"overallFlexibility": "moderate", "volumeFlexibility": "high"} |
| object | No | Visibility into logistics network operations | {"overallVisibility": "high", "trackingCapabilities": "Real-time tracking of 95% of shipments"} |
| array of objects | No | Third-party logistics providers in the network | [{"providerName": "Global Express Logistics", "servicesProvided": ["International freight", "Customs clearance"]}] |
| object | No | Strategy for improving the logistics network | {"optimizationFocus": ["Cost reduction", "Service level improvement"]} |
| object | No | Ability of the network to withstand disruptions | {"resilienceRating": "moderate", "vulnerabilityPoints": ["Port congestion", "Weather disruptions"]} |
| array of objects | No | Regulatory and compliance requirements | [{"requirementName": "International Trade Compliance", "complianceStatus": "compliant"}] |
Inventory Management Element Schema
Field | Type | Required | Description | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
| string | Yes | Unique identifier for the inventory management element | "INV-FG-001" |
| string | Yes | Type of inventory | "finished-goods" |
| string | Yes | Detailed explanation of the inventory management element | "Management of finished electronic products inventory across global distribution network" |
| string | Yes | The organization unit responsible for this inventory | "Global Inventory Management" |
| string | No | ID of the supply chain domain this inventory belongs to | "SC-MFG-001" |
| string | No | Strategic purpose of the inventory | "cycle" |
| object | No | Management approach for the inventory | {"policyType": "min-max", "policyDescription": "Regional minimum and maximum levels based on demand patterns"} |
| object | No | Quantity parameters for the inventory | {"averageInventory": "32 days of supply", "safetyStockLevel": "14 days of supply"} |
| object | No | Rate of inventory usage | {"turnoverRate": "11.4 times annually", "daysOfSupply": "32 days"} |
| object | No | Costs associated with inventory | {"totalInventoryValue": "$86M", "holdingCost": "21% of value annually"} |
| array of objects | No | Storage locations for inventory | [{"locationName": "Memphis DC", "inventoryValue": "$24M", "inventoryPercentage": 28}] |
| object | No | Tracking capabilities for inventory | {"visibilityLevel": "high", "trackingMethods": ["RFID", "WMS"], "dataAccuracy": "98.7%"} |
| object | No | Risk of inventory depletion | {"overallRisk": "moderate", "serviceLevel": "98.5% target", "actualServiceLevel": "97.2%"} |
| object | No | Risk of inventory obsolescence | {"overallRisk": "high", "obsolescenceRate": "4.2% annually"} |
| object | No | Approach to inventory improvement | {"optimizationObjectives": ["Reduce total inventory by 15%", "Maintain 98.5% service level"]} |
| array of objects | No | Metrics for measuring inventory performance | [{"metricName": "Inventory Accuracy", "currentValue": "98.7%", "targetValue": "99.5%"}] |
| object | No | Approach to planning inventory based on demand | {"forecastingMethod": "Statistical with machine learning", "forecastAccuracy": "78% at SKU level"} |
| object | No | Classification of inventory items | {"classificationMethod": "abc", "categoryBreakdown": [{...}]} |
| object | No | Quality management for inventory | {"inspectionProcess": "Sample-based quality inspection at receiving", "defectRate": "0.8%"} |
| object | No | Governance of inventory management | {"governanceStructure": "Inventory Review Board with monthly meetings", "auditingApproach": "Quarterly cycle counts"} |
Supply Chain-Strategy Relationship Schema
Field | Type | Required | Description | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
| string | Yes | Unique identifier for this relationship | "REL-SC-STR-001" |
| string | Yes | ID of the supply chain element | "SC-MFG-001" |
| string | Yes | Name of the strategy | "Digital Transformation Strategy" |
| string | Yes | Nature of the supply chain influence on strategy | "enabler" |
| integer | No | Strength of influence (1-5) | 4 |
| array of string | No | Supply chain factors influencing this strategy | ["Advanced visibility capabilities", "Digital supplier integration"] |
| object | No | How supply chain aligns with strategy | {"alignmentDescription": "Supply chain digitalization enables broader transformation", "alignmentLevel": "mostly-aligned"} |
| array of objects | No | Strategic objectives affected by supply chain | [{"objectiveID": "SO-2025-02", "supplyChainContribution": "Provides digital foundation"}] |
| object | No | How supply chain affects competitive position | {"positioningRole": "Differentiation through superior delivery reliability", "competitiveAdvantages": ["Faster time-to-market", "Higher delivery reliability"]} |
| array of objects | No | Constraints imposed by supply chain | [{"constraintDescription": "Manufacturing footprint limits market entry speed", "impactLevel": "moderate"}] |
| array of objects | No | Strategic investments in supply chain | [{"investmentName": "Supply Chain Control Tower", "investmentRationale": "Enable end-to-end visibility"}] |
| array of objects | No | Metrics for measuring strategic impact | [{"metricName": "Time-to-Market", "currentValue": "120 days", "targetValue": "90 days"}] |
Supply Chain-Capability Relationship Schema
Field | Type | Required | Description | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
| string | Yes | Unique identifier for this relationship | "REL-SC-CAP-001" |
| string | Yes | ID of the supply chain element | "SC-MFG-001" |
| string | Yes | Name of the capability | "Advanced Procurement" |
| string | Yes | Nature of the relationship | "critical" |
| integer | No | Importance of this relationship (1-5) | 5 |
| string | No | How capability contributes to supply chain | "Ensures strategic sourcing and supplier selection" |
| array of objects | No | Requirements the supply chain places on capability | [{"requirementDescription": "AI-powered supplier risk assessment", "importance": "high"}] |
| object | No | Maturity of capability for supply chain needs | {"maturityLevel": "defined", "maturityGaps": ["Digital skills", "Automation"]} |
| array of objects | No | Metrics for measuring capability contribution | [{"metricName": "Supplier Quality Index", "currentValue": "87/100", "targetValue": "92/100"}] |
| array of objects | No | Initiatives to improve capability for supply chain | [{"initiativeName": "Digital Procurement Transformation", "expectedBenefits": "30% reduction in procurement cycle time"}] |
| object | No | Resources allocated to capability for supply chain | {"budgetAllocation": "$4.2M annually", "personnelAllocation": "28 FTEs"} |
| string | No | How capability is governed for supply chain needs | "Quarterly capability review with defined performance metrics" |