Table of Contents | ||
---|---|---|
|
...
Overview
What is the Supply Chain Domain?
...
Organizations should plan for these evolutions by maintaining clean taxonomies and clear relationship models in their current implementation.
Conclusion
The Supply Chain Domain extends the Orthogramic Metamodel with a robust framework for modeling and managing supply chain aspects of business architecture. By providing structured schemas for supplier networks, supply chain processes, logistics networks, and inventory management, it enables organizations to systematically align their supply chain design with strategic objectives and operational requirements.
...
Organizations can use this domain to develop a more comprehensive understanding of their supply chain ecosystem, identify optimization opportunities, and ensure that strategic initiatives properly account for supply chain capabilities and constraints.
Supply Chain Domain Schema
Cross-Domain Relationship Mappings
...
Example Implementation
Example: Global Manufacturing Supply Chain Analysis
Code Block |
---|
{ "$schemasupplyChainID": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#SC-MFG-001", "title": "Global Electronics Manufacturing Supply Chain-Strategy Relationship Schema", "description": "SchemaEnd-to-end supply chain for relationships between Supply Chain domain and Strategy domain consumer electronics manufacturing, including component sourcing, assembly operations, distribution networks, and aftermarket service fulfillment.", "typesupplyChainCategory": "objectmanufacturing", "requiredorgUnitTitle": ["relationshipID"Global Supply Chain Management", "supplyChainID "orgUnitRoles": ["Chief Supply Chain Officer", "titleDirector of Global Sourcing", "relationshipTypeLogistics Operations Manager"], "propertiessupplyChainScope": {"enterprise", "relationshipIDgeographicCoverage": { "regions": ["North America"type":, "Europe", "stringAsia-Pacific", "Southeast Asia"], "descriptioncountries": ["UniqueUnited identifier for this relationship" }, "supplyChainID": {States", "China", "Vietnam", "Germany", "Malaysia", "Mexico"], "typecoverageType": "stringglobal", "descriptionexpansionPlans": "IDEvaluating new ofmanufacturing thehub supplyin chainEastern element"Europe by 2026" }, "titlelocationStrategy": { "typestrategyType": "stringproximity-to-supply", "descriptionstrategyDescription": "NamePrimary ofmanufacturing thefacilities strategy"positioned near key semiconductor and },component suppliers with regional "relationshipType": { distribution centers close to major markets", "typeevaluationCriteria": ["stringSupplier ecosystem density", "Labor expertise", "Logistics infrastructure", "description":Tax incentives"Nature] of the supply}, chain influence on strategy", "leadTime": { "enumendToEndLeadTime": ["enabler", "constraint", "differentiator", "cost-driver", "risk-factor", "capability-builder", "collaborative-advantage", "other"]"45-60 days", "componentLeadTimes": [ }, { "relationshipStrength": { "typecomponentName": "integerSemiconductor procurement", "descriptionduration": "Strength of influence (1-5)",30-45 days", "minimumvariability": 1,"High - affected by global shortages" "maximum": 5 }, "supplyChainFactors": { "typecomponentName": "arrayFinal assembly", "descriptionduration": "Supply chain factors influencing this strategy", "items": {7 days", "typevariability": "stringLow" }, }, { "strategicAlignment": { "typecomponentName": "objectDistribution to regional centers", "descriptionduration": "How supply chain aligns with strategy",5-10 days", "propertiesvariability": {"Medium - affected by port congestion" "alignmentDescription": { } ], "typeleadTimeReliability": "string", 72% on-time delivery to commitment dates", "descriptionimprovementTargets": "Description of alignment" Reduce end-to-end lead time to 35 days by Q4 2026" }, "alignmentLevel"volumeCapacity": { "type"normalCapacity": "string1.2 million units per month", "peakCapacity": "1.5 million units per month", "descriptionunitOfMeasure": "LevelFinished ofdevice alignmentunits", "utilizationRate": "83% average utilization", "enumcapacityConstraints": ["misalignedSemiconductor availability", "partially-alignedSkilled labor in Vietnam facility", "mostly-aligned", "fully-aligned"]Q4 shipping capacity"], "expansionPlans": "15% capacity increase planned for },Vietnam facility in 2026" }, "alignmentGapscostStructure": { "type"totalCost": "array",$425M annual supply chain operational cost", "descriptioncostComponents": "Areas[ where alignment is lacking", { "itemscomponentName": {"Materials and components", "typeamount": "string$312M", "percentage": }73.4 }, },{ "alignmentPlancomponentName": {"Manufacturing labor", "typeamount": "string$48M", "descriptionpercentage": "Plan11.3 to improve alignment" }, } { } }, "strategicObjectives": {"componentName": "Logistics and transportation", "typeamount": "array$36M", "descriptionpercentage": "Strategic objectives affected by supply chain", 8.5 }, "items": { "typecomponentName": "objectWarehousing and inventory", "propertiesamount": {"$19M", "objectiveIDpercentage": {4.5 }, "type": "string", { "descriptioncomponentName": "IDSupply ofchain strategic objectivemanagement", }"amount": "$10M", "supplyChainContributionpercentage": {2.3 } ], "typecostTrends": "string",Component costs decreasing 3% annually, logistics costs increasing 7% annually", "descriptioncostReductionTargets": "How8% supplytotal chaincost contributesreduction totarget objective"over next 24 months" }, "flexibilityRating": { "importanceLeveloverallRating": {"moderate", "volumeFlexibility": "high", "typemixFlexibility": "stringmoderate", "newProductFlexibility": "low", "descriptionimprovementFocus": "ImportanceEnhancing tonew objective",product introduction capabilities through modular manufacturing processes" }, "enumresilienceRating": ["minor",{ "overallRating": "moderate", "significantredundancyLevel",: "criticallow"], "diversificationLevel": "moderate", }"visibilityLevel": "high", "recoveryCapability": "moderate", } "resilienceInvestments": ["Secondary supplier qualification } program", "Regional inventory buffers", "Multi-modal transportation capability"] }, "competitivePositioningriskProfile": { "typeoverallRiskLevel": "objecthigh", "descriptionkeyRiskFactors": "How supply chain affects competitive position",[ "properties": { "positioningRolefactorName": {"Semiconductor supply constraints", "typeriskLevel": "stringhigh", "descriptionmitigationApproach": "Role in competitive positioning" Long-term contracts, strategic inventory, supplier diversification" }, { "competitiveAdvantages "factorName": {"Geopolitical disruption in Asia", "typeriskLevel": "arrayhigh", "descriptionmitigationApproach": "CompetitiveManufacturing advantagesfootprint created"diversification, scenario planning" }, "items": { { "typefactorName": "string"Ocean freight capacity and pricing volatility", } }"riskLevel": "moderate", "competitiveDisadvantagesmitigationApproach": { "Multi-modal options, contract diversification, selective air freight" "type": "array", } ], "descriptionriskMonitoringApproach": "CompetitiveMonthly risk disadvantagesreview created",with quarterly simulation and mitigation updates" }, "itemssustainabilityRating": { "overallRating": "moderate", "typecarbonFootprint": "string"187,000 metric tons CO2e annually", "wasteReduction": "72% }manufacturing waste diverted }from landfill", "benchmarkingsocialResponsibility": {"Tier 1 suppliers 100% audited for labor practices", "typesustainabilityInitiatives": ["string",Renewable energy transition at "description": "Comparison to competitors" owned facilities", "Packaging redesign program", "Scope 3 emissions tracking implementation"], } "sustainabilityReporting": "Annual sustainability report with science-based }targets" }, "strategyConstraintsenvironmentalImpact": { "typecarbonEmissions": "array", 187,000 metric tons CO2e annually", "descriptionwaterUsage": "Constraints450 imposedmillion bygallons supply chainannually", "itemswasteGeneration": {"5,200 tons annually", "typeresourceConsumption": "object",Critical minerals: 860 tons annually", "propertiesenvironmentalCompliance": {"100% compliance with regulated standards, 85% compliance with voluntary standards", "constraintDescriptionreductionTargets": {["30% carbon reduction by 2028", "20% water reduction by "type": "string", "description": "Description of constraint" 2027", "Zero waste to landfill by 2029"] }, "qualityMetrics": [ { }, "metricName": "First Pass Yield", "impactLevelmetricDescription": { "Percentage of units passing quality testing on first attempt", "typecurrentValue": "string94.6%", "descriptiontargetValue": "Level of impact97%", "enumtrend": ["minorimproving", "moderate", "significant", "severe"] }, { }, "metricName": "Defect Rate", "mitigationApproachmetricDescription": {"Defects per million opportunities", "typecurrentValue": "string350 DPMO", "targetValue": "200 DPMO", "descriptiontrend": "Approachimproving" to address constraint" }, { } "metricName": "Customer Return Rate", } "metricDescription": "Percentage of }shipped products returned due to }quality issues", "strategicInvestmentscurrentValue": {"1.8%", "typetargetValue": "array1.0%", "descriptiontrend": "stable"Strategic investments in supply chain", } ], "itemstechnologyEnablers": {[ { "typetechnologyName": "objectSupply Chain Control Tower", "propertiestechnologyPurpose": { "End-to-end visibility and exception management", "investmentNameimplementationStatus": {"operational", "businessImpact": "45% reduction in supply disruption "typeresolution time": "string", }, { "description "technologyName": "NameDigital ofTwin investment" }, Simulation", "investmentDescriptiontechnologyPurpose": {"Network design and scenario planning", "typeimplementationStatus": "stringimplementing", "description"businessImpact": "DescriptionExpected of12% investment"improvement in network efficiency" }, { "investmentRationaletechnologyName": {"Machine Learning Demand Forecasting", "typetechnologyPurpose": "string",Improved demand prediction accuracy", "descriptionimplementationStatus": "Strategic rationaleoperational", "businessImpact": "18% reduction in forecast },error" } ], "expectedOutcomesdigitalMaturity": { "overallMaturity": "defined", "typedataVisibility": "stringadvanced", "processAutomation": "developing", "descriptionadvancedAnalytics": "Anticipated resultsdefined", "digitalRoadmap": "Digital supply chain transformation program }with focus on process automation and predictive analytics through }2027" }, "maturityLevel": }{ }"overallMaturity": "defined", "performanceMetricsprocessMaturity": {"managed", "typeperformanceManagement": "arraydefined", "descriptionmaturityAssessmentDate": "2025-02-15"Metrics for measuring strategic}, impact", "improvementOpportunities": [ "items": { "typeopportunityName": "objectSupplier Collaboration Platform", "propertiesopportunityDescription": {"Implementation of real-time collaboration tools for design and planning with key suppliers"metricName":, { "potentialImpact": "high", "typeimplementationComplexity": "stringmedium", "description"status": "planning"Name of metric" }, { }, "opportunityName": "New Product Introduction Process Redesign", "metricDescriptionopportunityDescription": {"Streamlining of supply chain integration in NPI to reduce time-to-market", "typepotentialImpact": "stringhigh", "implementationComplexity": "high", "descriptionstatus": "Descriptionevaluating" of what is measured"}, { }, "opportunityName": "Logistics Network Optimization", "currentValueopportunityDescription": {"Comprehensive review and redesign of global distribution network", "typepotentialImpact": "stringmedium", "description"implementationComplexity": "Current performancehigh", "status": "planning" }, } ], "targetValuestrategicImportance": { "importanceLevel": "critical", "typestrategicContribution": "string",Supply chain capabilities are central to product availability, cost competitiveness, and sustainability goals", "descriptionalignmentWithObjectives": [ "Target performance" { "objectiveID": "SO-2025-02", "alignmentDescription": "Supply }chain digitalization supports corporate digital transformation objective" } }, } { } } } |
Supply Chain-Capability Relationship Schema
Code Block |
---|
{ "$schemaobjectiveID": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#SO-2025-04", "title": "Supply Chain-Capability Relationship Schema", "descriptionalignmentDescription": "SchemaSustainability forinitiatives relationshipsin betweensupply Supplychain Chainsupport domaincorporate andESG Capability domainobjectives", "type": "object", "required": ["relationshipID", "supplyChainID", "title", "relationshipType"], "properties": { "relationshipID} ] }, "competitiveAdvantage": { "typeadvantageLevel": "stringadvantage", "descriptionadvantageSources": ["UniqueAdvanced identifiervisibility for thistechnology", "Supplier relationship depth", "Multi-region }manufacturing flexibility"], "supplyChainIDcompetitiveBenchmarking": { "type": "string", "Leading in technology adoption and visibility, lagging in new product flexibility compared to key competitors", "descriptionsustainabilityOfAdvantage": "ID of the supply chain element" Technology advantage requires ongoing investment, relationship advantage sustainable with continued engagement" }, "titledependencies": [ { "typedependencyType": "stringCritical", "descriptiondomainType": "Capability"Name, of the capability" }"entityID": "CAP-SC-003", "relationshipTypedescription": "Advanced procurement capability" }, { "typedependencyType": "stringImportant", "descriptiondomainType": "Nature of the relationshipTechnology", "enumentityID": ["enablingTECH-007", "supportingdescription",: "dependent", "enhancing", "limiting", "critical", "developing", "other"]Supply chain planning and control tower systems" }, ], "relationshipStrengthrelatedSupplyChainElements": [ { "typeelementID": "integerSC-MFG-002", "descriptionrelationshipType": "Importance of this relationship (1-5)upstream", "minimumrelationshipStrength": 14, "maximumdescription": 5 "Component supplier network for semiconductors" }, "capabilityContribution": {{ "typeelementID": "stringSC-LOG-001", "descriptionrelationshipType": "How capability contributes to supply chain"downstream", }, "capabilityRequirementsrelationshipStrength": {5, "typedescription": "array",Global distribution network for finished goods" "description": "Requirements the supply} chain places on capability"], "itemsgovernanceModel": { "typegovernanceStructure": "object", Cross-functional Supply Chain Leadership Council with regional representation", "propertiesdecisionRights": {"Network design decisions centralized, execution decisions regionalized", "requirementDescriptionperformanceReviewProcess": {"Monthly operational reviews, quarterly strategic reviews", "typecontinuousImprovement": "string",Dedicated supply chain excellence team with agile improvement methodology" "description": "Description of requirement" }, "importance} } |
Supply Chain Domain Schema
Cross-Domain Relationship Mappings
Supply Chain-Strategy Relationship Schema
Code Block |
---|
{ "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#", "title": "Supply Chain-Strategy Relationship Schema", "description": "Schema for relationships between Supply Chain domain and Strategy domain", "type": "object", "required": ["relationshipID", "supplyChainID", "title", "relationshipType"], "properties": { "relationshipID": { "type": "string", "description": "Unique identifier for this relationship" "description": "Importance level" }, "supplyChainID": { "enumtype": ["lowstring", "medium", "highdescription",: "critical"]ID of the supply chain element" }, "title": { "fulfillmentLeveltype": {"string", "description": "Name of the strategy" "type": "string" }, "relationshipType": { "descriptiontype": "How well requirement is met", string", "description": "Nature of the supply chain influence on strategy", "enum": ["unmet"enabler", "constraint", "differentiator", "partiallycost-metdriver", "mostlyrisk-metfactor", "fullycapability-metbuilder"] , "collaborative-advantage", "other"] }, "improvementNeedsrelationshipStrength": { "type": "stringinteger", "description": "AreasStrength of needing improvement"influence (1-5)", "minimum": 1, } "maximum": 5 } } }, "capabilityMaturitysupplyChainFactors": { "type": "objectarray", "description": "MaturitySupply ofchain capabilityfactors forinfluencing supplythis chain needsstrategy", "propertiesitems": { "maturityLeveltype": {"string" } "type": "string" }, "strategicAlignment": { "descriptiontype": "Current maturity assessmentobject", "enumdescription": ["initial", "developing", "defined", "managed", "optimizing"]"How supply chain aligns with strategy", "properties": { }, "maturityGapsalignmentDescription": { "type": "arraystring", "description": "KeyDescription maturityof gapsalignment", }, "items "alignmentLevel": { "type": "string", "typedescription": "stringLevel of alignment", }"enum": ["misaligned", "partially-aligned", "mostly-aligned", "fully-aligned"] }, "maturityTargetsalignmentGaps": { "type": "stringarray", "description": "Areas where alignment is lacking", "Target maturity state"items": { "type": "string" } }, "developmentRoadmapalignmentPlan": { "type": "string", "description": "Plan forto capabilityimprove developmentalignment" } } }, "performanceMetricsstrategicObjectives": { "type": "array", "description": "MetricsStrategic forobjectives measuringaffected capabilityby contributionsupply chain", "items": { "type": "object", "properties": { "metricNameobjectiveID": { "type": "string", "description": "NameID of metricstrategic objective" }, "metricDescriptionsupplyChainContribution": { "type": "string", "description": "DescriptionHow supply ofchain whatcontributes isto measuredobjective" }, "currentValueimportanceLevel": { "type": "string", "description": "Current performance"Importance to objective", "enum": ["minor", "moderate", "significant", "critical"] }, } "targetValue": { } }, "typecompetitivePositioning": "string",{ "type": "object", "description": "TargetHow performance"supply chain affects competitive position", }, "properties": { "impactOnSupplyChainpositioningRole": { "type": "string", "description": "HowRole thisin metric affects supply chain" competitive positioning" }, }"competitiveAdvantages": { } }, "improvementInitiatives": { ""type": "array", "description": "InitiativesCompetitive toadvantages improvecreated", capability for supply chain", "items": { "type": "object",string" } "properties": { }, "initiativeNamecompetitiveDisadvantages": { "type": "stringarray", "description": "NameCompetitive ofdisadvantages initiative" }created", "initiativeDescriptionitems": { "type": "string", "description": "Description of initiative"} }, "expectedBenefitsbenchmarking": { "type": "string", "description": "SupplyComparison chainto benefits expectedcompetitors" }, } "status": { }, "strategyConstraints": { "type": "stringarray", "description": "Current statusConstraints imposed by supply chain", "items": { "enumtype": ["plannedobject", "in-progress", "completed", "ongoing"] "properties": { } "constraintDescription": { } } }"type": "string", "resourceAllocation": { "typedescription": "object",Description of constraint" "description": "Resources allocated to}, capability for supply chain", "propertiesimpactLevel": { "budgetAllocationtype": "string", { "typedescription": "stringLevel of impact", "descriptionenum": ["minor", "Budget allocated"moderate", "significant", "severe"] }, "personnelAllocationmitigationApproach": { "type": "string", "description": "PersonnelApproach allocated"to address constraint" } } }, }, "technologyInvestmentstrategicInvestments": { "type": "array", "typedescription": "stringStrategic investments in supply chain", "items": { "description "type": "Technology investments"object", "properties": { }, "allocationRationaleinvestmentName": { "type": "string", "description": "Rationale for resource allocation"Name of investment" }, } },"investmentDescription": { "governanceModel": { "type": "string", "description": "How capability is governed for supply chain needs"Description of investment" }, } } |
Strategic Response Model Integration
Supply Chain-Related Rationales Schema
Code Block |
---|
{ "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema# "investmentRationale": { "type": "string", "title": "Supply Chain-Related Rationales Schema", "description": "SchemaStrategic forrationale" supply chain-related rationales in the Strategic Response Model", "type": "object",}, "required": ["rationaleID", "rationaleTitle", "description", "triggerReference"], "propertiesexpectedOutcomes": { "rationaleID": { "type": "string", "description": "UniqueAnticipated identifierresults" for the rationale" }, } "rationaleTitle": { } "type": "string", } "description": "Title or summary of the rationale" }, "descriptionperformanceMetrics": { "type": "stringarray", "description": "DetailedMetrics explanationfor supporting ameasuring strategic responseimpact", }, "triggerReferenceitems": { "type": "stringobject", "descriptionproperties": "Primary{ trigger this rationale responds to" },"metricName": { "triggerReferences": { "type": "arraystring", "description": "Name of "Optional multiple triggers this rationale addresses",metric" }, "itemsmetricDescription": { "type": "string", } }, "supplyChainIDsdescription": {"Description of what is "type": "array",measured" "description": "Supply chain elements}, this rationale relates to", "itemscurrentValue": { "type": "string", } }, "linkedDomainsdescription": { "type":Current performance"array", "description": "Business architecture domains influenced}, or justified by this rationale", "itemstargetValue": { "type": "string", "enumdescription": ["Supply_Chain", "Strategy", "Capability", "Product", "Service", "Value_Stream", "Performance", "Information", "Organization", "Initiative", "Customer", "Market", "Finance", "Risk"]"Target performance" } } }, "rationaleType":} { } } |
Supply Chain-Capability Relationship Schema
Code Block |
---|
{ "type$schema": "string", http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#", "title": "Supply Chain-Capability Relationship Schema", "description": "TheSchema justificationfor typerelationships forbetween thisSupply rationale",Chain domain and Capability domain", "enumtype": ["Disruption_Responseobject", "Network_Optimizationrequired",: ["Cost_ReductionrelationshipID", "Service_ImprovementsupplyChainID", "Risk_Mitigationtitle", "Capability_DevelopmentrelationshipType"], "Sustainability_Enhancement", "Technology_Adoption", "Supplier_Changeproperties"]: { }, "rationaleOrientationrelationshipID": { "type": "string", "description": "Whether the rationale is responding to existing conditions or anticipating future conditions",Unique identifier for this relationship" }, "supplyChainID": { "enumtype": ["Reactivestring", "Proactive"] }, "description": "ID of the supply chain element" }, "supplyChainInsightSourcetitle": { "type": "string", "description": "SourceName of supply chain insights supporting this rationalethe capability" }, "relationshipType": { "type": "string", "description": "Nature of the relationship", "enum": ["Performance_Metricsenabling", "Supply_Chain_Analyticssupporting", "Market_Intelligencedependent", "Supplier_Feedbackenhancing", "Customer_Requirementslimiting", "Risk_Assessmentcritical", "Technology_Evaluationdeveloping", "Compliance_Analysisother"] }, "anticipatedOutcomesrelationshipStrength": { "type": "arrayinteger", "description": "ForImportance proactiveof rationales,this the expected benefits or outcomesrelationship (1-5)", "itemsminimum": {1, "maximum": 5 }, "capabilityContribution": { "type": "string", }"description": "How capability contributes to supply chain" }, "alternativesConsideredcapabilityRequirements": { "type": "array", "description": "OtherRequirements the supply chain approachesplaces that were evaluated but not selectedon capability", "items": { "type": "object", "properties": { "alternativeIDrequirementDescription": { "type": "string", "description": "IdentifierDescription forof the alternativerequirement" }, "alternativeDescriptionimportance": { "type": "string", "description": "Importance level", "Description of the alternative approach" "enum": ["low", "medium", "high", "critical"] }, "supplyChainImplicationsfulfillmentLevel": { "type": "string", "description": "SupplyHow chainwell implicationsrequirement ofis this alternativemet", }, "enum": ["unmet", "partially-met", "mostly-met", "fully-met"] "reasonForRejection }, "improvementNeeds": { "type": "string", "description": "WhyAreas this approach wasn't selectedneeding improvement" } } } }, "reasoningPatterncapabilityMaturity": { "type": "stringobject", "description": "The logical structureMaturity of thecapability rationale",for supply "enum": ["Total_Cost_Analysis", "Service_Level_Based", "Risk_Assessment", "Capability_Based", "Network_Flow_Analysis", "Multi_Criteria_Decision", "Scenario_Based", "Constraint_Based"] },chain needs", "properties": { "evidenceBasematurityLevel": { "type": "string", " "description": "Current maturity assessment"The, foundation for the rationale", "enum": ["Performance_Datainitial", "Market_Analysisdeveloping", "Supplier_Informationdefined", "Network_Modelingmanaged", "Risk_Assessment", "Cost_Analysis", "Customer_Requirements", "Benchmarking"]optimizing"] }, "businessValueTypematurityGaps": { "type": "stringarray", "description": "TheKey nature of value creation or preservationmaturity gaps", "enum": ["Cost_Savings", "Service_Enhancement", "Risk_Reduction", "Competitive_Advantageitems", "Agility_Improvement", "Quality_Improvement", "Sustainability_Advancement", "Capacity_Optimization"]: { }, "supplyChainImpactAssessmenttype": {"string" "type": "object", } "description": "Assessment of supply chain implications", }, "properties": { "impactAreas"maturityTargets": { "type": "arraystring", "description": "Target maturity state"Areas of supply chain impacted", }, "itemsdevelopmentRoadmap": { "type": "string", "enumdescription": ["supplier_network", "logistics", "inventory", "production", "customer_service", "cost_structure", "risk_profile", "sustainability", "compliance", "multiple"] Plan for capability development" } } }, "impactSeverityperformanceMetrics": { "type": "stringarray", "description": "Severity of impactMetrics for measuring capability contribution", "enum"items": ["minimal", "moderate", "significant", "severe", "transformative"]{ }"type": "object", "impactTimeframeproperties": { "typemetricName": "string", { "descriptiontype": "Whenstring", impact will be realized", "enumdescription": ["immediate", "short-term", "medium-term", "long-term", "ongoing"]Name of metric" }, "confidenceLevelmetricDescription": { "type": "integerstring", "description": "ConfidenceDescription of inwhat assessment (1-5)",is measured" "minimum": 1}, "maximumcurrentValue": 5{ } "type": "string", } }, "dateCreateddescription": {"Current performance" "type": "string", }, "format": "date", "descriptiontargetValue": "The{ date the rationale was first recorded" }, "lastReviewed": { "type": "string", "format": "date", "description": "TheTarget performance" most recent date of rationale review" }, "effectivenessRatingimpactOnSupplyChain": { "type": "integerstring", "description": "OptionalHow evaluationthis ofmetric rationaleaffects effectiveness (1-5)",supply chain" } "minimum": 1, } "maximum": 5} }, "authorimprovementInitiatives": { "type": "stringarray", "description": "TheInitiatives personto orimprove teamcapability whofor documentedsupply the rationalechain", }, "orgUnitTitleitems": { "type": "stringobject", "descriptionproperties": "The{ organisational unit that owns or authored the rationale" "initiativeName": { }, "relatedRationales": { "type": "arraystring", "description": "ReferencesName to other related rationales", of initiative" "items": { }, "type": "string" "initiativeDescription": }{ } } } |
Supply Chain-Related Strategic Responses Schema
Code Block |
---|
{ "$schematype": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#string", "title": "Supply Chain-Related Strategic Responses Schema", "description": "SchemaDescription forof supplyinitiative" chain-related strategic responses in the Strategic Response Model", "type": "object"}, "required": ["responseID", "responseTitle", "responseDescription", "triggerReferences", "rationaleReferences"], "propertiesexpectedBenefits": { "responseID": { "type": "string", "description": "A unique identifier for the strategic response"Supply chain benefits expected" }, "responseTitle "status": { "type": "string", "description": "ACurrent concisestatus", title summarizing the strategic response" }, "enum": ["planned", "responseType": {in-progress", "completed", "ongoing"] "type": "string", } "description": "The classification of the response",} "enum": ["Network_Redesign", "Supplier_Change", "Inventory_Strategy", "Logistics_Optimization", "Technology_Implementation", "Process_Improvement", "Risk_Mitigation", "Cost_Reduction", "Service_Enhancement", "Sustainability_Initiative"]} }, "responseDescriptionresourceAllocation": { "type": "stringobject", "description": "AResources detailedallocated explanationto ofcapability thefor strategicsupply responsechain", its objectives, and scope"properties": { }, "supplyChainIDsbudgetAllocation": { "type": "arraystring", "description": "Supply chain elements this response addresses"Budget allocated" }, "itemspersonnelAllocation": { "type": "string", } }, "description": "Personnel allocated" "triggerReferences": { }, "type": "array", "descriptiontechnologyInvestment": "An{ array of triggerIDs that initiated this strategic response", "type": "itemsstring":, { "typedescription": "stringTechnology investments" }, }, "rationaleReferencesallocationRationale": { "type": "arraystring", "description": "An array of rationaleIDs providing justification Rationale for this response", "items": {resource allocation" } "type": "string" } }, "performanceIndicatorReferencesgovernanceModel": { "type": "arraystring", "description": "MetricsHow orcapability KPIsis thatgoverned willfor besupply usedchain toneeds" measure the success of the strategic response",} } } |
Strategic Response Model Integration
Supply Chain-Related Strategic Responses Schema
Code Block |
---|
{ "items$schema": {"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#", "title": "Supply Chain-Related Strategic Responses Schema", "typedescription": "string"Schema for supply chain-related strategic responses in }the Strategic Response }, Model", "supplyChainOutcomestype": {"object", "typerequired": ["arrayresponseID", "responseTitle", "description": "Specific supply chain outcomes resulting from this response", "responseDescription", "triggerReferences", "rationaleReferences"], "properties": { "itemsresponseID": { "type": "objectstring", "propertiesdescription": {"A unique identifier for the strategic response" "outcomeDescription": {}, "responseTitle": { "type": "string", "description": "DescriptionA ofconcise supplytitle chainsummarizing outcome"the strategic response" }, "targetValue"responseType": { "type": "string", "description": "Target performance value"The classification of the response", "enum": ["Network_Redesign", "Supplier_Change", }, "Inventory_Strategy", "Logistics_Optimization", "Technology_Implementation", "Process_Improvement", "Risk_Mitigation", "Cost_Reduction", "Service_Enhancement", "Sustainability_Initiative"] "measurementApproach": {}, "responseDescription": { "type": "string", "description": "A detailed explanation of the "description": "How outcome will be measured" strategic response, its objectives, and scope" }, "timeframe"supplyChainIDs": { "type": "stringarray", "description": "When outcome is expectedSupply chain elements this response addresses", "items": { "enum": ["immediate", "short-term", "medium-term", "long-termtype",: "ongoingstring"] } } } }, "supplyChainChangestriggerReferences": { "type": "array", "description": "SpecificAn array changesof totriggerIDs supplythat chaininitiated configurationthis orstrategic operationsresponse", "items": { "type": "objectstring", } "properties": { }, "changeTyperationaleReferences": { "type": "stringarray", "description": "TypeAn array of supplyrationaleIDs chainproviding change",justification for this response", "items": { "enum": ["supplier", "network", "process", "technology", "inventory", "logistics", "policytype",: "organizationstring", "other"] } }, "changeDescription"performanceIndicatorReferences": { "type": "stringarray", "description": "DescriptionMetrics ofor theKPIs change"that will be used to measure the success of the strategic }response", "implementationApproachitems": { "type": "string", } }, "descriptionsupplyChainOutcomes": "How change will be implemented"{ "type": "array", "description": "Specific supply chain },outcomes resulting from this response", "impactedStakeholdersitems": { "type": "arrayobject", "descriptionproperties": "Stakeholders{ affected by this change", "items"outcomeDescription": { "type": "string", } "description": "Description of supply chain outcome" } }, } },"targetValue": { "affectedDomains": { "type": "arraystring", "description": "A list of business architecture domains impacted by this response"Target performance value" }, "itemsmeasurementApproach": { "type": "string", "enumdescription": ["Supply_Chain", "Strategy", "Capability", "Product", "Service", "Value_Stream", "Performance", "Information", "Organization", "Initiative", "Customer", "Market", "Finance", "Risk"] How outcome will be measured" }, } }, "implementationPlantimeframe": { "type": "object", "descriptiontype": "string"Plan, outlining how the response will be executed", "propertiesdescription": {"When outcome is expected", "phaseApproach": { "enum": ["immediate", "type": "string"short-term", "medium-term", "long-term", "ongoing"] "description": "Phasing of implementation" } } }, }, "keyMilestonessupplyChainChanges": { "type": "array", "description": "MajorSpecific changes implementationto milestones",supply chain configuration or operations", "items": { "type": "object", "properties": { "milestoneNamechangeType": { "type": "string", "description": "NameType of milestonesupply chain change", "enum": }["supplier", "network", "process", "technology", "inventory", "logistics", "policy", "organization", "other"] "targetDate": { }, "typechangeDescription": "string",{ "formattype": "datestring", "description": "TargetDescription of completionthe datechange" }, "descriptionimplementationApproach": { "type": "string", "description": "DescriptionHow ofchange milestone"will be implemented" }, "impactedStakeholders": { } } "type": "array", }, "resourcesdescription": {"Stakeholders affected by this "type": "string",change", "descriptionitems": "Resources required for implementation"{ }, "governanceStructuretype": {"string" "type": "string", } "description": "Governance over implementation" } } } }, "supplyChainRisksaffectedDomains": { "type": "array", "description": "Risks related to the supply chainA list of business architecture domains impacted by this response", "items": { "type": "objectstring", "propertiesenum": { "riskDescription": {["Supply_Chain", "Strategy", "Capability", "Product", "Service", "Value_Stream", "Performance", "Information", "Organization", "Initiative", "Customer", "Market", "Finance", "Risk"] } }, "typeimplementationPlan": "string", { "type": "object", "description": "DescriptionPlan ofoutlining risk"how the response will be executed", }, "properties": { "likelihoodphaseApproach": { "type": "string", "description": "ProbabilityPhasing of occurrenceimplementation", }, "enum": ["very-low", "low", "moderate", "high", "very-highkeyMilestones"]: { }, "type": "array", "impactdescription": {"Major implementation milestones", "typeitems": "string",{ "descriptiontype": "Potential impact if risk occursobject", "enumproperties": ["minimal", "moderate", "significant", "severe", "critical"]{ }, "milestoneName": { "mitigationStrategy": { "type": "string", "description": "Approach to managing risk"Name of milestone" }, } "targetDate": }{ }, "expectedOutcomes": { "type": "string", "description": "A description of the anticipated results or benefits from implementing the response""format": "date", }, "responsibleOrgUnits": { "typedescription": "array",Target completion date" "description": "Organisation units accountable for executing the strategic response", }, "itemsdescription": { "type": "string", } }, "startDatedescription": { "Description of milestone" } "type": "string", "format": "date", } "description": "The planned start date for} implementing the strategic response" }, "endDateresources": { "type": "string", "format": "date", "description": "TheResources plannedrequired completionfor dateimplementation" for the strategic response" }, "statusgovernanceStructure": { "type": "string", "description": "TheGovernance currentover statusimplementation" of the strategic response", } "enum": ["Planned", "In_Progress", "Completed", "Deferred", "Cancelled"] } }, "lastUpdatedsupplyChainRisks": { "type": "stringarray", "format": "date", "description": "TheRisks daterelated whento the supply strategicchain response record was last updated"", }, "stakeholderEngagementitems": { "type": "object", "descriptionproperties": "Approach{ to engaging key stakeholders", "propertiesriskDescription": { "keyStakeholderstype": {"string", "typedescription": "array",Description of risk" "description": "Important stakeholders to engage" }, "itemslikelihood": { "type": "objectstring", "propertiesdescription": {"Probability of occurrence", "stakeholderNameenum": { "type": "string", "description": "Name of stakeholder"["very-low", "low", "moderate", "high", "very-high"] }, "stakeholderTypeimpact": { "type": "string", "description": "Type of stakeholderPotential impact if risk occurs", "enum": ["supplierminimal", "customermoderate", "internalsignificant", "partnersevere", "regulatorcritical", "other"] }, "engagementApproachmitigationStrategy": { "type": "string", "description": "HowApproach stakeholderto willmanaging be engagedrisk" } } } } }, "expectedOutcomes": }{ "type": }, "communicationPlan": {"string", "description": "A description of the anticipated results or benefits from implementing the response" }, "responsibleOrgUnits": { "type": "stringarray", "description": "Plan for stakeholder communication" Organisation units accountable for executing the strategic response", "items": { } "type": "string" } }, "strategicThemesstartDate": { "type": "array"string", "format": "date", "description": "AnThe arrayplanned ofstart strategicdate prioritiesfor thatimplementing thisthe initiativestrategic supportsresponse", }, "itemsendDate": { "type": "string", } "format": "date", "description": "The planned completion date for the strategic response" }, } } |
Example Implementation
Example: Global Manufacturing Supply Chain Analysis
...
"status": {
"type": "string",
"description": "The current status of the strategic response",
"enum": ["Planned", "In_Progress", "Completed", "Deferred", "Cancelled"]
},
"lastUpdated": {
"type": "string",
"format": "date",
"description": "The date when the strategic response record was last updated"
},
"stakeholderEngagement": {
"type": "object",
"description": "Approach to engaging key stakeholders",
"properties": {
"keyStakeholders": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Important stakeholders to engage",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"stakeholderName": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Name of stakeholder"
},
"stakeholderType": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Type of stakeholder",
"enum": ["supplier", "customer", "internal", "partner", "regulator", "other"]
},
"engagementApproach": {
"type": "string",
"description": "How stakeholder will be engaged"
}
}
}
},
"communicationPlan": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Plan for stakeholder communication"
}
}
},
"strategicThemes": {
"type": "array",
"description": "An array of strategic priorities that this initiative supports",
"items": {
"type": "string"
}
}
}
}
|
Supply Chain Domain Schema Properties
...
Field | Type | Required | Description | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
| string | Yes | Unique identifier for this relationship | "REL-SC-CAP-001" |
| string | Yes | ID of the supply chain element | "SC-MFG-001" |
| string | Yes | Name of the capability | "Advanced Procurement" |
| string | Yes | Nature of the relationship | "critical" |
| integer | No | Importance of this relationship (1-5) | 5 |
| string | No | How capability contributes to supply chain | "Ensures strategic sourcing and supplier selection" |
| array of objects | No | Requirements the supply chain places on capability | [{"requirementDescription": "AI-powered supplier risk assessment", "importance": "high"}] |
| object | No | Maturity of capability for supply chain needs | {"maturityLevel": "defined", "maturityGaps": ["Digital skills", "Automation"]} |
| array of objects | No | Metrics for measuring capability contribution | [{"metricName": "Supplier Quality Index", "currentValue": "87/100", "targetValue": "92/100"}] |
| array of objects | No | Initiatives to improve capability for supply chain | [{"initiativeName": "Digital Procurement Transformation", "expectedBenefits": "30% reduction in procurement cycle time"}] |
| object | No | Resources allocated to capability for supply chain | {"budgetAllocation": "$4.2M annually", "personnelAllocation": "28 FTEs"} |
| string | No | How capability is governed for supply chain needs | "Quarterly capability review with defined performance metrics" |
Supply Chain-Related Rationales Schema
Field | Type | Required | Description | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
| string | Yes | Unique identifier for the rationale | "RAT-SC-2025-001" |
| string | Yes | Title or summary of the rationale | "Semiconductor Supply Chain Resilience Strategy" |
| string | Yes | Detailed explanation supporting a strategic response | "Comprehensive approach to mitigate semiconductor supply constraints through diversification, strategic inventory, and design flexibility" |
| string | Yes | Primary trigger this rationale responds to | "TRG-SC-2025-001" |
| array of string | No | Optional multiple triggers this rationale addresses | ["TRG-SC-2025-001", "TRG-SC-2025-004"] |
| array of string | No | Supply chain elements this rationale relates to | ["SC-MFG-001", "SC-MFG-002"] |
| array of string | No | Business architecture domains influenced or justified by this rationale | ["Supply_Chain", "Strategy", "Risk"] |
| string | No | The justification type for this rationale | "Risk_Mitigation" |
| string | No | Whether the rationale is responding to existing conditions or anticipating future conditions | "Reactive" |
| string | No | Source of supply chain insights supporting this rationale | "Supply_Chain_Analytics" |
| array of string | No | For proactive rationales, the expected benefits or outcomes | ["Reduced supply disruptions by 60%", "Lower expedite costs by 40%"] |
| array of objects | No | Other supply chain approaches that were evaluated but not selected | [{"alternativeID": "ALT-001", "alternativeDescription": "Single-source with strategic partnership", "reasonForRejection": "Insufficient risk mitigation"}] |
| string | No | The logical structure of the rationale | "Risk_Assessment" |
| string | No | The foundation for the rationale | "Supplier_Information" |
| string | No | The nature of value creation or preservation | "Risk_Reduction" |
| object | No | Assessment of supply chain implications | {"impactAreas": ["supplier_network", "inventory"], "impactSeverity": "significant"} |
| string | No | The date the rationale was first recorded | "2025-01-20" |
| string | No | The most recent date of rationale review | "2025-03-15" |
| integer | No | Optional evaluation of rationale effectiveness (1-5) | 4 |
| string | No | The person or team who documented the rationale | "Supply Chain Strategy Team" |
| string | No | The organisational unit that owns or authored the rationale | "Global Supply Chain Management" |
| array of string | No | References to other related rationales | ["RAT-SC-2025-002", "RAT-SC-2025-003"] |
...