Table of Contents | ||
---|---|---|
|
...
These are maintained within the metamodel and visualised within Orthogramic Insights to support exploration and navigation.
Relationship type list
Icon | Relationship Type | Description |
---|---|---|
| Finance provides financial resources to another domain entity to enable its development, operation, or enhancement. | |
| Finance expresses the activities, outputs, or outcomes of another domain entity in measurable financial terms. | |
| Finance produces formal reports capturing the financial performance, costs, or returns associated with another domain entity. | |
| Finance projects future financial needs, costs, or revenues associated with another domain entity. | |
| One domain entity receives necessary resources, services, or capabilities from another domain entity to deliver its intended outputs or outcomes. | |
| One domain entity imposes limitations, standards, or compliance requirements on another domain entity’s design, operation, or evolution. | |
| One domain entity is essential for the successful implementation, operationalisation, or fulfilment of another domain entity. | |
| One domain entity actively reduces the risks or vulnerabilities associated with another domain entity. | |
| One domain entity oversees, measures, or evaluates the performance or effectiveness of another domain entity. | |
| One domain entity defines policies, standards, or decision rights that control the operation of another domain entity. | |
| One domain entity generates, influences, or amplifies the demand for another domain entity’s outputs, services, or capabilities. | |
| One domain entity is triggered, adapted, or activated in response to changes in another domain entity or external event. | |
| One domain entity uses, relies upon, or draws from the resources, outputs, or services of another domain entity. | |
| One domain entity is intentionally coordinated or harmonised with another domain entity in purpose, direction, or design without establishing a direct dependency. | |
| For systematic traceability of oversight responsibilities. | |
| For a clear line of responsibility between entities |
...
Show how elements from different domains relate visually
Allow users to follow logical chains from Strategy through to Initiatives and Performance
Enable dynamic exploration of organisational alignment
...
Orthogramic uses cross domain relationships to:
Identify capability gaps blocking strategic goals
Recommend services or stakeholders needed for an initiative
Highlight policies or information dependencies that require attention
Info |
---|
Difference from inter-domain relationshipsCross domain relationships describe the conceptual and operational connections between different types of elements across domains (e.g. a Strategy influencing a Capability). They are structural to the metamodel and are not confined to any particular organisational unit. By contrast, inter-domain relationships focus on how these cross-domain connections manifest across different organisational units—for instance, how a Capability in one unit depends on a Service or Initiative governed by another. Inter-unit domain relationships are thus a subset of cross domain relationships, contextualised to show organisational span, dependency, and potential silos |
...
Extensibility
New relationship types can be added over time as the metamodel evolves. User feedback and document analysis are both sources for suggesting and validating additional relationship types
. |