Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Table of Contents
minLevel1
maxLevel2
outlinefalse
stylenone
typelist
printabletrue

...

  • Focus: Capturing why an enterprise does what it does

  • Key concepts: Ends (goals, objectives), Means (strategies, tactics), Influencers, Assessments

  • Adjacency: Complements Orthogramic’s Strategic Response Model — especially Trigger, Rationale, and StrategicResponse

  • Comparison: BMM is more narrowly focused on motivation and influence, while Orthogramic incorporates motivation as one dimension within a broader operational model

  • Used by: Business modellers, strategic planners

12. SAP Enterprise Architecture Framework

  • Focus: Structuring enterprise architecture in SAP-centric environments

  • Key concepts: Business Capability Map, Reference Architectures, Value Maps

  • Adjacency: Orthogramic’s Capabilities, Value Streams, and Initiatives are directly applicable for SAP-aligned transformation programs

  • Comparison: SAP’s metamodel is more vendor-specific; Orthogramic is open and technology-neutral but mappable

  • Used by: SAP clients and consultants, enterprise architects in transformation programs

...

  • Focus: Military systems architecture and interoperability

  • Key concepts: Capability, Performer, Activity, Resource Flow, Standards

  • Adjacency: Orthogramic’s Capabilities, Stakeholders, Initiatives, and Value Streams map well conceptually

  • Comparison: DoDAF is highly formal, based on mission assurance and traceability; Orthogramic is lighter, more flexible

  • Used by: Defence agencies, system-of-systems architects, NATO/coalition partners

Summary comparison table

Framework / Metamodel

Focus Area

Orthogramic Mapping Strength

Notes

BIAN

Banking services architecture

High

Service domains map to Orthogramic Services and Capabilities

BIZBOK

Business architecture

High

Shared domains (Capabilities, Value Streams, etc.)

TOGAF

EA methodology and governance

High (method), Medium (metamodel)

Orthogramic can provide structural content for TOGAF ADM phases

ArchiMate

EA modelling language

Medium–High

Orthogramic data can generate or map to ArchiMate views

FIBO

Financial industry semantics

Medium

Complements Information and Policy domains

APQC PCF

Process classification framework

Medium

Aligns with Value Streams and Capability Processes

Zachman

EA classification schema

Medium

Orthogramic offers structured data where Zachman provides classification

DMN

Business decision modelling

Medium

Maps to Policy and Process domains for business rule integration

UAF

Systems-of-systems architecture

Medium

Partial mapping to Capabilities, Initiatives, Strategy

FEAF

Federal EA framework (US gov)

High

Strong alignment with Capabilities, Performance, Information

BMM (OMG)

Business motivation model

Very High

Orthogramic’s Strategic Response Model is a superset

SAP EA Framework

Enterprise architecture for SAP

Medium–High

Mappable via Value Streams and Capabilities

DMBOK (DAMA)

Data governance and management

Medium

Extends Information and Policy domains for stewardship and lineage

DoDAF DM2

Defence systems architecture metamodel

Medium–High

Maps to Capabilities, Stakeholders, Initiatives; Orthogramic is more agile