| Table of Contents | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
...
Focus: Banking and financial services
Key concepts: Service Domains, Control Records, Functional Patterns
Adjacency: Aligns well with Orthogramic’s Capabilities, Services, and Value Streams
Used by: Banks, core banking vendors, financial regulators
2.
...
SAP Enterprise Architecture Framework
Focus: General business architectureStructuring enterprise architecture in SAP-centric environments
Key concepts: Business Capability Map, Reference Architectures, Value Maps
Adjacency: Orthogramic’s Capabilities, Value Streams, Information, Stakeholders
Adjacency: Orthogramic is structurally richer and schema-first; BIZBOK is more narrative
Used by: Business architects across industriesand Initiatives are directly applicable for SAP-aligned transformation programs
Comparison: SAP’s metamodel is more vendor-specific; Orthogramic is open and technology-neutral but mappable
Used by: SAP clients and consultants, enterprise architects in transformation programs
3. TOGAF (The Open Group Architecture Framework)
...
Focus: Capturing why an enterprise does what it does
Key concepts: Ends (goals, objectives), Means (strategies, tactics), Influencers, Assessments
Adjacency: Complements Orthogramic’s Strategic Response Model — especially
Trigger,Rationale, andStrategicResponseComparison: BMM is more narrowly focused on motivation and influence, while Orthogramic incorporates motivation as one dimension within a broader operational model
Used by: Business modellers, strategic planners
12.
...
BIZBOK (Business Architecture Body of Knowledge)
Focus: Structuring enterprise architecture in SAP-centric environmentsGeneral business architecture
Key concepts: Business Capability Map, Reference Architectures, Value MapsAdjacency: Orthogramic’s Capabilities, Value Streams, and Initiatives are directly applicable for SAP-aligned transformation programs
Comparison: SAP’s metamodel is more vendor-specific; Orthogramic is open and technology-neutral but mappable
Used by: SAP clients and consultants, enterprise architects in transformation programs, Information, Stakeholders
Adjacency: Orthogramic is structurally richer and schema-first; BIZBOK is more narrative
Used by: Business architects across industries
13. DMBOK (Data Management Body of Knowledge by DAMA)
...
Focus: Military systems architecture and interoperability
Key concepts: Capability, Performer, Activity, Resource Flow, Standards
Adjacency: Orthogramic’s Capabilities, Stakeholders, Initiatives, and Value Streams map well conceptually
Comparison: DoDAF is highly formal, based on mission assurance and traceability; Orthogramic is lighter, more flexible
Used by: Defence agencies, system-of-systems architects, NATO/coalition partners
Summary comparison table
Framework / Metamodel | Focus Area | Orthogramic Mapping Strength | Notes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BIAN | Banking services architecture | High | Service domains map to Orthogramic Services and Capabilities | |
BIZBOKSAP EA Framework | Business Enterprise architecture for SAP | High | Shared domains (Capabilities, Value Streams, etc.)Medium–High | Mappable via Value Streams and Capabilities |
TOGAF | EA methodology and governance | High (method), Medium (metamodel) | Orthogramic can provide structural content for TOGAF ADM phases | |
ArchiMate | EA modelling language | Medium–High | Orthogramic data can generate or map to ArchiMate views | |
FIBO | Financial industry semantics | Medium | Complements Information and Policy domains | |
APQC PCF | Process classification framework | Medium | Aligns with Value Streams and Capability Processes | |
Zachman | EA classification schema | Medium | Orthogramic offers structured data where Zachman provides classification | |
DMN | Business decision modelling | Medium | Maps to Policy and Process domains for business rule integration | |
UAF | Systems-of-systems architecture | Medium | Partial mapping to Capabilities, Initiatives, Strategy | |
FEAF | Federal EA framework (US gov) | High | Strong alignment with Capabilities, Performance, Information | |
BMM (OMG) | Business motivation model | Very High | Orthogramic’s Strategic Response Model is a superset | |
SAP EA FrameworkBIZBOK | Enterprise Business architecture for SAP | Medium–High | Mappable via Value Streams and CapabilitiesHigh | Shared domains (Capabilities, Value Streams, etc.) |
DMBOK (DAMA) | Data governance and management | Medium | Extends Information and Policy domains for stewardship and lineage | |
DoDAF DM2 | Defence systems architecture metamodel | Medium–High | Maps to Capabilities, Stakeholders, Initiatives; Orthogramic is more agile |