...
Strategic priorities and business case elements
Stakeholder alignment and time horizons
Resource requirements and implementation roadmaps
Governance structures and performance indicators
Communication approaches and integration methods
Risk mitigation approaches and contingency plans
Integration with Other Domains
The Sustainability Domain connects with several existing domains in the Orthogramic Metamodel:
Sustainability-Strategy Integration
Ensures strategic objectives align with sustainability priorities:
How sustainability initiatives support strategic goals
Which sustainability aspects are strategic priorities
How investments align with sustainability-focused strategies
Development of value propositions that incorporate sustainability
Sustainability-Performance Integration
Defines how sustainability success is measured:
KPIs for environmental, social, and governance performance
How sustainability performance drives strategic decisions
Measurement of sustainability outcomes and impacts
Continuous improvement based on sustainability metrics
Sustainability-Risk Integration
Establishes connections between sustainability and risk management:
How sustainability issues create or mitigate risks
Risk assessment for sustainability initiatives
Climate and environmental risk management
Regulatory and compliance risk related to sustainability
Sustainability-Capability Integration
Defines how capabilities support sustainability objectives:
Which capabilities directly contribute to sustainability goals
How capabilities should incorporate sustainability considerations
Capability gaps that prevent meeting sustainability commitments
Performance metrics that measure sustainability capabilities
Sustainability-Value Stream Integration
Shows how sustainability integrates with value delivery:
Mapping sustainability considerations to value stream stages
Identifying sustainability impacts in value streams
Designing value streams with sustainability considerations
Measuring value stream performance based on sustainability criteria
Implementation Guidelines
Getting Started
Begin by identifying and documenting key sustainability categories relevant to your organization
Select a high-priority sustainability aspect and map its environmental impacts
Document the social responsibility initiatives and their stakeholder benefits
Define the governance practices that support sustainability objectives
Connect sustainability elements to strategic objectives and capabilities
Best Practices
Ensure sustainability elements have clear ownership and accountability
Base sustainability assessments on recognized standards and frameworks
Link sustainability metrics to strategic priorities and operational outcomes
Connect sustainability elements to risk management processes
Involve multiple functions in sustainability governance to prevent siloed approaches
Maintain a balance between compliance requirements and strategic opportunities
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Creating too many sustainability metrics without clear prioritization
Focusing exclusively on compliance without strategic integration
Failing to connect sustainability activities to business value creation
Not updating sustainability models as stakeholder expectations evolve
Overlooking the interconnections between environmental, social, and governance factors
Neglecting to capture and report progress on sustainability commitments
Schema Evolution Guidance
The Sustainability Domain schema is expected to evolve with emerging practices in sustainability management. Future extensions may include:
Climate resilience modeling
Circular economy frameworks
Biodiversity impact assessment
Supply chain sustainability traceability
Science-based targets integration
ESG ratings and benchmarking frameworks
Organizations should plan for these evolutions by maintaining clean taxonomies and clear relationship models in their current implementation.
Conclusion
The Sustainability Domain extends the Orthogramic Metamodel with a robust framework for modeling and managing sustainability-related aspects of business architecture. By providing structured schemas for environmental impacts, social responsibility initiatives, governance practices, and sustainability strategies, it enables organizations to systematically align their sustainability efforts with strategic objectives and operational requirements.
...
| Code Block |
|---|
{
"impactID": "ENV-CARBON-001",
"impactTitle": "Corporate Carbon Footprint",
"impactDescription": "Comprehensive assessment of organization-wide greenhouse gas emissions across Scopes 1, 2, and 3, including direct operations, purchased energy, and value chain activities.",
"impactScope": "enterprise",
"impactCategory": "emissions",
"orgUnitTitle": "Sustainability Office",
"orgUnitRoles": ["Chief Sustainability Officer", "Environmental Program Manager", "Carbon Reporting Specialist"],
"impactMeasurement": {
"methodologyName": "GHG Protocol Corporate Standard",
"measurementUnits": "Metric tons CO2 equivalent (tCO2e)",
"measurementFrequency": "annual",
"dataQuality": "high",
"verificationStatus": "third-party verified"
},
"currentFootprint": {
"reportingPeriod": "2024",
"totalImpact": "345,000 tCO2e",
"impactBreakdown": [
{
"category": "Scope 1 (Direct emissions)",
"amount": "78,500 tCO2e",
"percentage": 22.8,
"sources": ["Fleet vehicles", "Natural gas combustion", "Refrigerant leakage"]
},
{
"category": "Scope 2 (Purchased energy)",
"amount": "125,300 tCO2e",
"percentage": 36.3,
"sources": ["Electricity", "Steam", "Cooling"]
},
{
"category": "Scope 3 (Value chain)",
"amount": "141,200 tCO2e",
"percentage": 40.9,
"sources": ["Business travel", "Employee commuting", "Purchased goods and services", "Product use", "End-of-life treatment"]
}
],
"baselineComparison": {
"baselineYear": "2020",
"changePercentage": -12.5,
"absoluteChange": "-49,300 tCO2e"
}
},
"targetFootprint": {
"targetYear": "2030",
"reductionTarget": "50% reduction from 2020 baseline",
"absoluteTarget": "197,150 tCO2e",
"scienceBasedAlignment": "1.5°C pathway aligned",
"interimTargets": [
{
"year": "2025",
"targetReduction": "25% reduction from 2020 baseline",
"absoluteTarget": "295,725 tCO2e"
}
]
},
"reductionStrategy": {
"strategyName": "Carbon Reduction Roadmap",
"approachDescription": "Comprehensive program to reduce emissions through renewable energy transition, fleet electrification, supplier engagement, and operational efficiency improvements",
"keyInitiatives": [
{
"initiativeName": "Renewable Energy Transition",
"description": "100% renewable electricity procurement through PPAs and on-site generation",
"expectedReduction": "105,000 tCO2e",
"timeframe": "2024-2027",
"investmentRequired": "$42M",
"status": "in progress"
},
{
"initiativeName": "Fleet Electrification",
"description": "Transition 80% of vehicle fleet to electric vehicles",
"expectedReduction": "35,000 tCO2e",
"timeframe": "2024-2028",
"investmentRequired": "$28M",
"status": "in progress"
},
{
"initiativeName": "Supplier Engagement Program",
"description": "Partner with top 100 suppliers to reduce Scope 3 emissions",
"expectedReduction": "55,000 tCO2e",
"timeframe": "2024-2030",
"investmentRequired": "$12M",
"status": "planning"
}
]
},
"regulatoryRequirements": {
"currentRegulations": [
{
"regulationName": "Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD)",
"jurisdiction": "European Union",
"complianceStatus": "compliant",
"requirementDescription": "Mandatory sustainability reporting including GHG emissions"
},
{
"regulationName": "SEC Climate Disclosure Rule",
"jurisdiction": "United States",
"complianceStatus": "compliant",
"requirementDescription": "Disclosure of climate-related risks and GHG emissions"
}
],
"emergingRegulations": [
{
"regulationName": "Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism",
"jurisdiction": "European Union",
"expectedImpact": "moderate",
"preparednessLevel": "planning stage"
}
]
},
"industryBenchmarks": {
"industryAverage": "425,000 tCO2e",
"industryLeaders": "175,000 tCO2e",
"competitivePosition": "better than average, approaching leader status",
"peerComparison": "15% lower emissions than industry average, 20% higher than industry leaders"
},
"mitigationInitiatives": [
{
"initiativeID": "INIT-CARBON-001",
"initiativeTitle": "Carbon Reduction Program",
"status": "active",
"relationshipType": "primary",
"relationshipStrength": 5
},
{
"initiativeID": "INIT-ENERGY-002",
"initiativeTitle": "Energy Efficiency Program",
"status": "active",
"relationshipType": "supporting",
"relationshipStrength": 4
}
],
"reportingProtocol": {
"frameworkName": "GHG Protocol",
"reportingFrequency": "annual",
"publicDisclosure": "yes",
"reportingPlatforms": ["Annual Sustainability Report", "CDP Climate Change Response", "Corporate Website"]
},
"verificationStandard": {
"standardName": "ISO 14064-3",
"verifier": "ERM CVS",
"assuranceLevel": "limited",
"verificationScope": "Scope 1 and 2 emissions, selected Scope 3 categories",
"lastVerificationDate": "2024-03-15"
},
"strategicAlignment": {
"alignmentDescription": "Carbon reduction directly supports our corporate climate strategy and net-zero commitment",
"strategicObjectives": ["Achieve net-zero emissions by 2040", "Position as sustainability leader in industry", "Reduce exposure to carbon pricing risks"],
"alignmentStrength": "high"
},
"riskImplications": {
"primaryRisks": [
{
"riskType": "transition",
"riskDescription": "Carbon pricing mechanisms increasing operational costs",
"potentialImpact": "medium",
"mitigationApproach": "Accelerated carbon reduction initiatives, internal carbon pricing"
},
{
"riskType": "physical",
"riskDescription": "Climate-related disruptions to operations and supply chain",
"potentialImpact": "high",
"mitigationApproach": "Climate adaptation measures, supplier diversification, business continuity planning"
}
],
"secondaryRisks": [
{
"riskType": "reputation",
"riskDescription": "Stakeholder pressure for more ambitious climate action",
"potentialImpact": "medium",
"mitigationApproach": "Transparent reporting, science-based targets, stakeholder engagement"
}
]
}
}
|
Sustainability Domain Schema
Cross-Domain Relationship Mappings
| Info |
|---|
Add to JSON Schema Convert these Cross domain JSON schema snippets to tables |
Sustainability-Strategy Relationship Schema
...
| Code Block |
|---|
{
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
"title": "Sustainability-Performance Relationship Schema",
"description": "Schema for relationships between Sustainability domain and Performance domain",
"type": "object",
"required": ["relationshipID", "sustainabilityID", "performanceID", "relationshipType"],
"properties": {
"relationshipID": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Unique identifier for this relationship"
},
"sustainabilityID": {
"type": "string",
"description": "ID of the sustainability element"
},
"performanceID": {
"type": "string",
"description": "ID of the performance indicator"
},
"relationshipType": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Nature of the relationship",
"enum": ["direct-measurement", "indirect-indicator", "leading-indicator", "lagging-indicator", "proxy-measure", "other"]
},
"relationshipStrength": {
"type": "integer",
"description": "Importance of this relationship (1-5)",
"minimum": 1,
"maximum": 5
},
"measurementApproach": {
"type": "object",
"description": "How sustainability is measured through this performance indicator",
"properties": {
"approachDescription": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Description of measurement approach"
},
"dataSource": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Source of measurement data"
},
"measurementFrequency": {
"type": "string",
"description": "How often measurement occurs",
"enum": ["real-time", "daily", "weekly", "monthly", "quarterly", "annually"]
},
"calculationMethodology": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Method used to calculate the indicator"
}
}
},
"performanceTargets": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Targets for this performance indicator",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"targetDescription": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Description of the target"
},
"targetValue": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Target value"
},
"targetYear": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Year for target achievement"
},
"baselineValue": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Baseline value"
},
"baselineYear": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Baseline year"
}
}
}
},
"frameworkAlignment": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Alignment with sustainability reporting frameworks",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"frameworkName": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Name of reporting framework"
},
"specificDisclosure": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Specific disclosure or indicator in framework"
},
"alignmentLevel": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Level of alignment with framework",
"enum": ["partial", "full", "exceeds"]
}
}
}
},
"dataQuality": {
"type": "object",
"description": "Assessment of data quality for this indicator",
"properties": {
"qualityLevel": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Overall data quality assessment",
"enum": ["low", "medium", "high", "very-high"]
},
"completeness": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Assessment of data completeness",
"enum": ["poor", "fair", "good", "excellent"]
},
"accuracy": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Assessment of data accuracy",
"enum": ["poor", "fair", "good", "excellent"]
},
"consistency": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Assessment of data consistency",
"enum": ["poor", "fair", "good", "excellent"]
},
"improvementPlan": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Plan to improve data quality"
}
}
},
"assuranceApproach": {
"type": "object",
"description": "Approach to verifying this indicator",
"properties": {
"assuranceType": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Type of assurance",
"enum": ["none", "internal", "external-limited", "external-reasonable"]
},
"assuranceProvider": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Organization providing assurance"
},
"assuranceStandard": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Standard used for assurance"
},
"assuranceFrequency": {
"type": "string",
"description": "How often assurance is performed"
}
}
},
"performanceHistory": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Historical performance for this indicator",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"year": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Performance year"
},
"value": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Performance value"
},
"trend": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Trend direction",
"enum": ["improving", "stable", "declining", "mixed"]
}
}
}
},
"stakeholderRelevance": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Relevance to different stakeholders",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"stakeholderGroup": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Stakeholder group"
},
"relevanceLevel": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Level of relevance to stakeholder",
"enum": ["low", "medium", "high", "critical"]
},
"stakeholderUseCase": {
"type": "string",
"description": "How stakeholder uses this information"
}
}
}
}
}
} |
Sustainability Domain
...
Properties
Sustainability Domain Attributes
...
Property | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
strategyID | Unique identifier for the sustainability strategy | "STRAT-SUST-001" |
strategyTitle | Name of the specific sustainability strategy | "Sustainable Business Transformation" |
strategyDescription | Detailed explanation of the sustainability strategy | "Five-year roadmap to embed sustainability across all business operations and value chain" |
orgUnitTitle | Organization unit responsible for this strategy | "Sustainability Office" |
sustainabilityID | ID of the sustainability domain this strategy belongs to | "SUST-STRAT-001" |
strategicPriorities | Key focus areas of the strategy | ["Climate action", "Circular economy", "Inclusive workplace", "Sustainable supply chain"] |
businessCaseElements | Value proposition of the strategy | {"valueDrivers": ["Risk reduction", "Cost savings", "Revenue growth", "Brand enhancement"]} |
stakeholderAlignment | How strategy aligns with stakeholder expectations | {"alignmentAssessment": "Strong alignment with investor and customer expectations"} |
timeHorizon | Timeline for strategy implementation | {"startYear": "2025", "endYear": "2030", "phaseApproach": "Three implementation phases"} |
resourceRequirements | Resources needed for the strategy | {"totalInvestment": "$85M", "staffingNeeds": "Cross-functional team of 45 FTEs"} |
implementationRoadmap | Plan for strategy execution | {"phases": [{"phaseName": "Foundation", "timeframe": "2025-2026"}]} |
governanceStructure | Management approach for the strategy | {"oversight": "Board Sustainability Committee", "execution": "Sustainability Steering Committee"} |
performanceIndicators | How strategy success is measured | {"frameworkType": "Balanced scorecard", "keyMetrics": ["Carbon reduction", "Circular material use"]} |
communicationApproach | How strategy is communicated | {"internalApproach": "Town halls, training", "externalApproach": "Sustainability report, investor days"} |
integrationWithBusinessStrategy | How sustainability connects with overall strategy | {"integrationLevel": "fully integrated", "strategicPillars": ["Growth", "Efficiency", "Innovation"]} |
riskMitigationApproach | How strategy addresses risks | {"approaches": ["Climate scenario analysis", "Supply chain resilience planning"]} |
Schema Evolution Guidance
The Sustainability Domain schema is expected to evolve with emerging practices in sustainability management. Future extensions may include:
Climate resilience modeling
Circular economy frameworks
Biodiversity impact assessment
Supply chain sustainability traceability
Science-based targets integration
ESG ratings and benchmarking frameworks
Organizations should plan for these evolutions by maintaining clean taxonomies and clear relationship models in their current implementation.