...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
| style | none |
|---|
| Info |
|---|
The Orthogramic metamodel is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0) license, ensuring that it remains open, collaborative, and widely accessible. |
Introduction
The Capability domain in Orthogramic defines the core functions and abilities that enable your organization to achieve its strategic objectives. Each Capability is linked to other business architecture domains like Value Streams, Products, and Stakeholders, providing a clear view of how your organization operates and delivers value. Orthogramic's data-driven approach allows you to continuously assess and evolve Capabilities, ensuring they remain aligned with changing business needs and market dynamics. Discover how the Capability domain helps you optimize organizational performance and strategic alignment.
What is a Capability in Orthogramic?
...
What is a Capability?
The Capabilities domain represents core functions and competencies an organization must develop and maintain to deliver value and achieve strategic objectives. It provides a structured view of what an organization can do, independent of processes, systems, or people.
Capabilities act as a bridge between strategy and execution, enabling organizations to align their goals with day-to-day operations. Unlike traditional frameworks such as BIZBOK, which offer a more static and rigid approach to Capability management, Orthogramic presents a dynamic, real-time perspective that adapts as an organization evolves. This adaptability makes it easier for businesses to respond to rapid changes in market conditions and strategic priorities, emphasizing continuous alignment with business objectives.
Orthogramic’s approach to Capabilities is deeply integrated with other business architecture domains, including Strategy, Value Streams, Information, Stakeholders, and more. Each Capability is not seen in isolation but is interconnected with various attributes, sub-elements, and dependencies that define its role within the organization. This interconnectedness provides a richer, more comprehensive understanding of how Capabilities contribute to the overall business architecture. By embedding these relationships within the platform, Orthogramic allows organizations to see not just what a Capability is but how it functions within a larger ecosystem of business elements.
One of the key differences between Orthogramic and BIZBOK is how data is managed and updated. In BIZBOK, Capabilities are often manually documented, requiring significant effort to maintain accuracy and relevance as business needs shift. This can lead to delays and outdated information, hindering quick decision-making. In contrast, Orthogramic leverages automation to keep Capabilities current. Using advanced data analytics, machine learning, and AI, the platform continuously assesses and updates Capabilities, ensuring they remain aligned with strategic objectives. This data-driven approach enables users to make informed decisions based on the most up-to-date information, enhancing organizational agility.
Orthogramic’s emphasis on real-time data allows for a more dynamic understanding of performance metrics associated with each Capability. These metrics are integrated into every aspect of Capability management, providing a continuous feedback loop that helps organizations monitor progress and adjust strategies accordingly. Unlike BIZBOK, which typically treats performance as a separate consideration, Orthogramic embeds performance indicators directly into the Capability model, allowing for immediate insights into how well a Capability is contributing to overall business goals. This shift supports more agile decision-making, as stakeholders can quickly identify gaps, assess the impact of changes, and adjust resources to optimize outcomes.
Furthermore, Orthogramic’s Capabilities are designed to be user-friendly and accessible to a broader audience within an organization, not just specialized business architects. This democratization of business architecture is a significant departure from BIZBOK, which often caters primarily to professionals with deep expertise in the field. In Orthogramic, capabilities can be explored, adjusted, and managed by a wide range of users, from HR and operations to strategy and IT teams. This inclusivity fosters greater collaboration across departments, leading to a more cohesive and unified organizational strategy.
Orthogramic also goes beyond BIZBOK by providing predictive insights into Capability evolution. Using AI and machine learning, the platform can forecast potential changes in a Capability’s relevance or importance based on market trends, internal performance data, and external factors. This proactive approach contrasts with BIZBOK’s more retrospective methodology, which focuses heavily on documenting past and present states without the same emphasis on predicting future scenarios. Orthogramic’s predictive capabilities help organizations stay ahead of industry trends, positioning them for success in a rapidly changing business landscape.
The relationships between Capabilities and other business architecture domains are a crucial feature in Orthogramic. Each Capability is associated with specific attributes, elements, and sub-elements that define its scope and impact. For example, a Capability might be linked to particular processes, technologies, or resources, each with its own set of dependencies and implications for the organization. Orthogramic captures these details, synthesizing them into a comprehensive view that allows decision-makers to understand the full context of any Capability. This holistic perspective makes it easier to identify synergies between Capabilities, streamline processes, and eliminate redundancies, leading to more efficient operations and better strategic alignment.
In summary, a Capability in Orthogramic is not merely a function or a static entity; it is a living, evolving component of the business architecture that adapts in real-time to support the organization’s strategic goals. Unlike BIZBOK, which often relies on manual updates and a framework-centric approach, Orthogramic’s data-driven, automated methodology allows for continuous evolution and alignment. By democratizing access to Capability management, integrating performance metrics, and providing predictive insights, Orthogramic empowers organizations to navigate complexity with agility and precision. This modern approach ensures that Capabilities are not only well-defined but also strategically aligned, making Orthogramic a vital tool for businesses seeking to thrive in a dynamic environment.
| Info |
|---|
Relationship of Domain, Attributes, Elements and Sub-ElementsTo understand the Relationship of Domain, Attributes, Elements and Sub-Elements, see: https://orthogramic.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/OM/pages/245137488/Domain+Attributes+Elements?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWYyMjRjYzk3MzNjNDQxNWE4NjJlZjU1NmI1ZDg5NTEiLCJwIjoiYyJ9 |
Capability attributes
...
Domain
...
Attribute
...
Description
...
Example
...
capabilities
...
alignment of resources, technology, and processes to achieve desired outcomes. The domain incorporates data analytics for continuous assessment and predictive insights into capability evolution, forecasting potential changes based on market trends and internal data.
Capability function
A Capability Function represents the overarching purpose and role of a capability within the organization. It defines what the capability enables the business to achieve and how it supports strategic objectives. By clarifying its function, organizations can ensure that capabilities are aligned with business goals and effectively contribute to value creation.
Capability components
Capability Components are the key structural elements that make up a capability, including the people, processes, technology, and information that enable it to function. These components define how the capability operates, ensuring that it is effectively designed, implemented, and maintained to support business objectives.
Capability process
A Capability Process outlines the essential workflows, activities, and tasks that drive the capability’s operation. It describes how the capability is executed within the organization, ensuring consistency, efficiency, and alignment with broader business processes. Understanding these processes helps organizations optimize performance and improve overall capability effectiveness.
Capability domain attributes
Attribute | Description | Example | |
| The name or title of the Capability | Automated Track Inspection System | |
capabilities | Description | A detailed explanation of what the Capability entails | AI-enabled system for continuous track geometry measurement and defect detection |
capabilities | Purpose | The intended purpose or function of the Capability within the Organization | Enhance track inspection efficiency and accuracy |
capabilities | Owner | The individual or team responsible for the Capability | Chief of Track Inspection Technologycapabilities |
| The Organization unit(s) to which the Capability is linked | Track and Rail Infrastructure Division | |
capabilities | Inputs | The resources information or materials required for the Capability to function | Track geometry data, rail wear measurements, historical defect data |
capabilities | Outputs | The deliverables or results produced by the Capability | Daily inspection reports, defect predictions, maintenance recommendations |
capabilities | Processes | The set of processes that define how the Capability operates | Data collection, analysis, defect identification, reporting |
capabilities | Performance Indicators | Metrics used to measure the effectiveness and efficiency of the Capability | Detection accuracy: 96.5%, False alarm rate: 2.3% |
capabilities | Dependencies | Other capabilities processes or systems that the Capability depends on | GPS systems, data transmission network, analysis software |
capabilities | Related Capabilities Capabilities that are related or linked to this Capability | Rail flaw detection, bridge inspection systems | |
capabilities | Maturity Level | The current maturity level of the Capability | Level 4 - Advanced Implementation |
capabilities | Tools and Technologies | Tools and technologies used to support or enable the Capability | LIDAR sensors, machine learning models, track geometry cars |
capabilities | Compliance and Standards | Regulatory requirements and standards the Capability must adhere to | 49 CFR Part 213, FRA Track Safety Standards |
capabilities | Cost | The financial cost associated with implementing and maintaining the Capability | Annual operating cost: $12.8M |
capabilities | Risks | Potential risks associated with the Capability and its operations | Equipment failure, data accuracy issues |
capabilities | Improvement Opportunities | Areas where the Capability can be enhanced or improved | Integrate thermal imaging, expand coverage to secondary lines |
capabilities | Strategic Alignment | How the Capability aligns with the Organizations strategic goals and objectives | Supports accident reduction and efficiency goals |
capabilities | Parent | A high-level Capability that encompasses multiple sub-capabilities or child capabilities | Track Safety Assurance System |
capabilities | Child | A specific Capability that falls under a broader parent Capability | Rail Profile Measurement |
capabilities | Child Process | A detailed process that supports a child Capability | Continuous rail wear monitoring |
Capability Function Element
Element | Sub-Element | Description | Example |
capabilityFunction | Title | The name or title of the function | Track Geometry Measurement |
capabilityFunction | Description | A detailed explanation of what the function involves | Automated measurement of track geometry parameters |
capabilityFunction |
| The intended purpose or function of the activity | Ensure compliance with FRA track geometry standards |
capabilityFunction | Owner | The individual or team responsible for the function | Track Geometry Program ManagercapabilityFunction |
| The Organization unit(s) where the function resides | Track Inspection Division | |
capabilityFunction | Inputs | The inputs required to perform the function | Raw sensor data, track class information |
capabilityFunction | Outputs | The outputs or deliverables produced by the function | Geometry exception reports, maintenance alerts |
capabilityFunction | Processes | The processes involved in the function | Data collection, analysis, reporting, validation |
Capability Components Element Element
Sub-Element | Description | Example | |
capabilityComponent | Title | The name or title of the Capability component | Rail Wear Detection System |
capabilityComponent | Description | A detailed explanation of what the Capability component involves | Automated measurement of rail head wear and profile |
capabilityComponent | Purpose | The intended purpose or benefit of the Capability component | Monitor rail degradation and predict maintenance needs |
capabilityComponent | Owner | The individual or team responsible for the Capability component | Rail Integrity Program Lead |
capabilityComponent |
| The Organization unit(s) utilizing the Capability component | Track Maintenance Division |
capabilityComponent | Technologies | The technologies and tools used for the Capability component | Laser profilers, ultrasonic sensors, analysis software |
capabilityComponent | Processes | The processes involved in the Capability component | Data collection, wear analysis, reporting |
capabilityComponent | Skills | The skills and competencies required for the Capability component | Rail inspection certification, data analysis expertise |
Capability Process Element Element
Sub-Element | Description | Example | |
capabilityProcess | Title | The name or title of the Process | Track Inspection and Assessment Process |
capabilityProcess | Description | A detailed explanation of what the Process entails | Standardized procedure for conducting comprehensive track inspections and safety assessments |
capabilityProcess | Purpose | The intended purpose or function of the Process | Ensure systematic evaluation of track conditions to maintain FRA safety standards |
capabilityProcess | Owner | The individual or team responsible for the Process | Chief Track InspectorcapabilityProcess |
| The Organization unit(s) where the Process resides | Track Safety Division | |
capabilityProcess | Parent Capability | The Capability this Process supports | Track Safety Assurance System |
capabilityProcess | Inputs | The inputs required to perform the Process | Track class specifications, Previous inspection data, Maintenance history |
capabilityProcess | Outputs | The outputs or deliverables produced by the Process | Inspection reports, Defect notifications, Maintenance recommendations |
capabilityProcess | Steps | Detailed steps involved in the Process |
|
capabilityProcess | Performance Metrics | Metrics used to measure Process effectiveness | Inspection completion rate: 98%, Defect identification accuracy: 96% |
capabilityProcess | Compliance Requirements | Regulatory requirements governing the Process | 49 CFR Part 213 - Track Safety Standards |
capabilityProcess | Tools Required | Tools and equipment needed for the Process | Track geometry car, Gauge measurement devices, Digital inspection tablets |