A Rationale provides the logical reasoning behind a strategic or operational response. It is triggered by a specific condition (Trigger), and it guides the alignment of actions across one or more business architecture domains. Rationales are formalised objects in the Strategic Response Model and are central to decision transparency and traceability. See: Strategic Response Model
Rationales help ensure that every action taken by the organisation is grounded in strategic intent.
Every Rationale must reference the Trigger that prompted it. This is represented either by linking to a triggerID
or embedding the full Trigger object (via schema reference). This linkage ensures traceability from external condition through to internal response.
Rationales may arise from performance insights, stakeholder needs, risk exposures, compliance obligations, or strategic opportunities.
In the Orthogramic Metamodel, rationales serve to:
Justify why an initiative, policy, or change exists.
Link strategic drivers to responses in a structured way.
Support transparency and traceability from high-level drivers to operational change.
Rationales may be connected to multiple elements across the business architecture, including:
Initiatives and Strategies that require justification.
Policies, Capabilities, and Value Streams being introduced or adjusted.
Performance goals or KPIs in the Performance domain.
Each response includes a rationale
object that captures the justification for action. It replaces previous references to rationaleId
and allows richer traceability and reasoning.
Field | Description |
---|---|
| A short name for the rationale |
| A detailed explanation of the reasoning behind the response |
| Categorises the driver (e.g. Regulatory, Risk, Market, Insight) |
| Reference to the originating insight, regulation, or analysis |
| KPIs that the response is intended to influence or improve |
| (Optional) Indicates urgency or importance (e.g. High, Medium, Low) |
Each rationale is categorised by a Driver Type, which is derived from the Strategic Response Model. This provides a consistent basis for understanding and classifying business responses across the organisation.
The Strategic Response Model defines the following categories of drivers:
Driver Type | Description | Common Triggers | Example Rationales | Related Domains |
---|---|---|---|---|
Regulatory change | Changes in legal or regulatory requirements | New legislation, audits | Align with safety standards; address compliance risks | Policy, Initiatives, Capabilities, Performance |
Customer demand shift | Shifting customer expectations or behaviours | Feedback, usage patterns | Improve onboarding; redesign mobile services | Strategy, ValueStream, Capabilities, Stakeholders |
Operational risk | Threats to continuity or operational efficiency | System failure, safety incidents | Enhance cyber resilience; strengthen recovery plans | Capabilities, Performance, Information, Organisation |
Technology obsolescence | Legacy or unsupported systems impacting operations | End-of-life systems, innovation lag | Modernise tech stack; enable data interoperability | Information, Capabilities, Initiatives |
Cost pressure | Financial constraints requiring efficiency or cost optimisation | Budget cuts, benchmarking | Consolidate platforms; automate manual processes | Performance, Capabilities, Initiatives, Organisation |
Workforce change | Evolving workforce dynamics | Hybrid work, attrition | Reskill staff; adapt HR policies | Organisation, Policy, Capabilities |
Stakeholder expectation | Pressure or concern from internal or external stakeholders | Board expectations, ESG concerns | Increase transparency; implement ethical compliance | Stakeholders, Policy, Performance |
Market opportunity | New market trends or emerging business opportunities | Competitor gap, new segment demand | Launch services; localise products | Strategy, ValueStream, Capabilities, Initiatives |
Classification: Each rationale must include a driver type. Multiple drivers may be selected if appropriate.
Traceability: Rationales should link to the relevant strategy, initiative, or performance goal.
Consistency: Use the https://orthogramic.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/OM/pages/290914315/Triggers#Trigger-Catalogue to guide classification.
Every rationale originates in response to a defined Trigger—an external event, internal insight, or strategic condition that prompts consideration or action. The Rationale captures the logical reasoning for why a specific response is necessary, based on that triggering context. This link is formalised via the trigger
field, which connects each rationale directly to its source condition using the
For further details on how triggers are defined, classified, and managed, see: Triggers and the associated https://orthogramic.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/OM/pages/290914315/Triggers#Trigger-Catalogue, which outlines recognised types such as Regulatory, Risk, Opportunity, and Performance Insight.
Rationales are formed by analysing the implications of a specific trigger—whether external (e.g. regulatory change, market shift) or internal (e.g. performance trend, operational failure)—and articulating the reasoning behind a proposed strategic response. Each rationale provides the logical and contextual justification for why a response is appropriate, necessary, or valuable. This step bridges the gap between situational awareness (the trigger) and deliberate action (the response), ensuring decisions are traceable, defensible, and aligned with organisational goals.
By linking a rationale to its originating trigger, organisations can ensure transparency in decision-making, assess the consistency of responses over time, and identify patterns that inform future strategic planning. Rationales also provide auditability for governance, especially when responses involve major investments or policy changes.
A rationale may influence multiple business architecture domains. These are listed under the linkedDomains
property and allow downstream actions to be traced back to justifying logic. The classification
field allows rationales to be categorised according to:
Risk
Compliance
Opportunity
Mandate
Performance Insight
Stakeholder Need
Other
The trigger property in the Rationale schema is now defined using a JSON Schema $ref to the Trigger schema, which includes details such as:
triggerID
title
triggerType
(e.g. Regulatory, Risk, Opportunity, Performance Insight)
{
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
"title": "Rationale Schema",
"description": "Schema for a Rationale object used in the Strategic Response Model to explain the reasoning behind strategic responses",
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"rationaleTitle": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Title or summary of the rationale"
},
"description": {
"type": "string",
"description": "A detailed explanation of the rationale supporting a strategic response"
},
"trigger": {
"$ref": "
https://orthogramic.com/schemas/trigger.schema.json ",
"description": "Trigger object that prompted this rationale, defined according to the Trigger schema"
},
"linkedDomains": {
"type": "array",
"description": "List of business architecture domains influenced or justified by this rationale",
"items": {
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"Strategy",
"Capabilities",
"Initiatives",
"Policy",
"Information",
"Performance",
"Products",
"Services",
"Stakeholder",
"Value Stream"
]
}
},
"classification": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Optional category for the rationale (e.g. risk mitigation, compliance, opportunity, mandate)",
"enum": [
"Risk",
"Compliance",
"Opportunity",
"Mandate",
"Performance Insight",
"Stakeholder Need",
"Other"
]
},
"dateCreated": {
"type": "string",
"format": "date",
"description": "The date the rationale was first recorded"
},
"author": {
"type": "string",
"description": "The person or team who documented the rationale"
},
"orgUnitTitle": {
"type": "string",
"description": "The organisational unit that owns or authored the rationale"
}
},
"required": [
"rationaleTitle",
"description",
"trigger"
]
}