A Rationale provides the logical reasoning behind a strategic or operational response. It connects a specific condition (Trigger) to a reasoned explanation that guides actions across one or more business architecture domains. Rationales are formalized objects in the Strategic Response Model and are central to decision transparency and traceability. Strategic Response Model
Rationales help ensure that every action taken by the organization is grounded in strategic intent and can be clearly explained through a documented reasoning process.
Every Rationale must reference the Trigger that prompted it. This is represented by linking to a triggerID
. This linkage ensures traceability from external condition through to internal response.
Rationales may arise from various considerations in response to triggers, including risk assessment, compliance requirements, strategic opportunities, or performance insights.
In the Orthogramic Metamodel, rationales serve to:
Explain why an initiative, policy, or change exists
Link strategic drivers to responses in a structured way
Support transparency and traceability from high-level drivers to operational change
Bridge the gap between organizational triggers and strategic objectives
Rationales may be connected to multiple elements across the business architecture, including:
Initiatives and Strategies that require explanation
Policies, Capabilities, and Value Streams being introduced or adjusted
Performance goals or KPIs in the Performance domain
Each rationale bridges the gap between a trigger event and organizational action. While triggers explain what happened to prompt a response, rationales explain why we're responding in this specific way.
Rationales in the Orthogramic Metamodel follow a structured classification system that supports analytics, reuse, and auditability. Each rationale is categorized according to:
Rationale Type: The response category (Preventative, Remedial, Opportunistic, etc.)
Reasoning Pattern: The logical structure of the rationale (Causal, Comparative, Normative, etc.)
Evidence Base: The foundation for the rationale (Data-driven, Expert judgment, Industry best practice, etc.)
Strategic Objective Reference: Direct link to the strategic objective this rationale supports
Business Value Type: The nature of value creation or preservation (Cost reduction, Revenue growth, Risk reduction, etc.)
This classification framework enables organizations to:
Trace patterns in decision-making across similar situations
Evaluate the distribution of rationales by type, evidence base, and strategic alignment
Establish a rationale library that can be referenced for similar future decisions
Support knowledge management and organizational learning
It's important to understand the relationship between Triggers and Rationales:
Triggers represent external or internal events/conditions that prompt a response (what happened)
Rationales explain the reasoning behind a specific response to that trigger (why we're responding this way)
A single Trigger (e.g., "New Safety Regulation") might prompt multiple Rationales with different types:
Preventative: "Implementing these changes will prevent future incidents"
Compliance-focused: "We must implement to meet regulatory requirements"
Opportunistic: "This gives us a competitive advantage in safety reputation"
Clarity: Each rationale should clearly articulate the reasoning that connects the trigger to the chosen response
Traceability: Rationales should link to the relevant trigger, strategic objective, and affected domains
Consistency: Use the defined rationale types to ensure consistent classification
Evidence: Document the evidence base that supports each rationale
Strategic Alignment: Always connect rationales to strategic objectives to maintain alignment
Rationales bridge between Triggers and organizational responses across multiple domains:
Strategy: Rationales explain strategic adjustments based on triggers
Capabilities: Rationales describe why capabilities need to be developed or modified
Initiatives: Rationales provide the foundation for launching initiatives
Policy: Rationales explain policy changes in response to triggers
Performance: Rationales describe modifications to performance metrics
Field | Type | Required | Description | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
| string (uuid) | Yes | Unique identifier for the rationale |
|
| string | Yes | Title or summary of the rationale |
|
| string | Yes | Detailed explanation supporting a strategic response |
|
| string (uuid) | Yes | Primary trigger this rationale responds to |
|
| array of uuid | No | Optional multiple triggers this rationale addresses |
|
| array of enum | No | Business architecture domains influenced or justified by this rationale |
|
| string (enum) | Yes | The justification type for this rationale |
|
| string (enum) | No | The logical structure of the rationale |
|
| string (enum) | No | The foundation for the rationale |
|
| string (uuid) | No | Reference to the strategic objective this rationale supports |
|
| string (enum) | No | The nature of value creation or preservation |
|
| string (date) | No | The date the rationale was first recorded |
|
| string (date) | No | The most recent date of rationale review |
|
| integer (1–5) | No | Optional evaluation of rationale effectiveness |
|
| string | No | The person or team who documented the rationale |
|
| string | No | The organisational unit that owns or authored the rationale |
|
| array of uuid | No | References to other related rationales |
|
| array of enum | No | Type of relationship with each related rationale |
|
This schema supports structured reasoning and traceability across strategy, policy, and initiative development, ensuring that every response is grounded in a documented rationale that bridges from trigger events to strategic objectives.