The Strategic Response Model provides a formalised structure for capturing how an organisation responds to external triggers and internal performance insights. It links these drivers to organisational reasoning (rationales) and defines the actions taken across strategic, policy, capability, and initiative domains. By making these relationships explicit, the model supports traceability, alignment, and accountability across the business architecture.
Each strategic response includes references to the triggers that prompted the change and the rationales that explain the basis for the response. Responses are associated with affected domains and are monitored through linked performance indicators, which define what success looks like and how progress is measured. These indicators support ongoing evaluation by including target values, baseline comparisons, timeframes, and data sources, enabling continuous assessment of strategic effectiveness.
This model supports continuous strategic alignment by documenting why a change occurred, how it was rationalised, and what was impacted and by how much—across strategies, capabilities, initiatives, policy, and organisational units.
The Strategic Response Model (SRM) links observed conditions—both external and internal—to formal responses across Strategy, Capabilities, Policy, Initiatives, and other domains. It is comprised of three core elements:
Triggers: Events, insights, or conditions that prompt a response. See: https://orthogramic.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/OM/pages/290914315
Rationales: The reasoned justification for responding to a trigger. See https://orthogramic.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/OM/pages/289996835
Responses: The aligned changes or activities, captured in other business architecture domains.
Performance Indicators: The quantifiable metrics used to evaluate the success, efficiency, or impact. See: https://orthogramic.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/OM/pages/293077166
This structured model enables traceable, auditable, and adaptive decision-making throughout the organisation.
The SRM strengthens strategic governance by ensuring that:
Business responses are traceable to defined triggers
Rationales are explicitly captured and consistently structured
Impact across domains and organisational units is recorded
Organisational learning and auditability are enhanced
Each Strategic Response includes:
A trigger: drawn from the shared trigger catalogue
A rationale object: structured and detailed, replacing simple references
One or more affected domains: such as policy, initiatives, or capabilities
Impacted organisational units: using defined role types
Response actions: steps taken or planned
Expected outcomes: anticipated benefits or changes in performance
A performance indicator measuring a response
Responses reference a trigger selected from a standardised catalogue of events, trends, or insights. This ensures consistency in classifying causes of change and enables systemic analysis across responses.
Strategic responses typically impact one or more of the following domains:
Strategy: adjustments to goals or strategic direction
Capabilities: development, enhancement, or decommissioning
Initiatives: programs or projects started or stopped
Policy: introduction or amendment of rules and frameworks
Performance: redefinition or reweighting of KPIs
Information: changes to how data is used or governed
Value Stream: refinements in end-to-end value delivery
The impactedUnits
array uses standardised relationship roles (as defined in the Inter-unit Domain Relationships model). See: https://orthogramic.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/OM/pages/285016368
Rationales play an important role in classifying and organising strategic responses. Ensure that the trigger catalogue—which lists common environmental or operational triggers prompting strategic responses—is up to date. Reference to the trigger catalogue within this page ensures that rationales are accurately categorised based on their initiating context, improving traceability from external or internal stimuli through to strategic objectives, initiatives, and performance metrics.
See: https://github.com/Orthogramic/Orthogramic_Metamodel
Field | Description | Example |
---|---|---|
| A unique identifier for the strategic response. |
|
| A concise title summarizing the strategic response. |
|
| The classification of the response (e.g., Initiative, Policy Change, Capability Development). |
|
| A detailed explanation of the strategic response, its objectives, and scope. |
|
| An array of |
|
| An array of |
|
| Metrics or KPIs that will be used to measure the success of the strategic response. |
|
| A list of business architecture domains impacted by this response (e.g., Capabilities, Services). |
|
| A reference or description of the plan outlining how the response will be executed. |
|
| A description of the anticipated results or benefits from implementing the response. |
|
| Organisation units accountable for executing the strategic response. |
|
| The planned start date for implementing the strategic response. |
|
| The planned completion date for the strategic response. |
|
| The current status of the strategic response (e.g., Planned, In Progress, Completed). |
|
| The date when the strategic response record was last updated. |
|
This format ensures that the strategic response definition is:
Declarative (not procedural or UI-specific),
Traceable (everything points to reusable metamodel entities),
Reusable (across tools, audits, planning activities).