The Supply Chain domain represents the end-to-end network and processes governing the flow of materials, goods, services, and related information from suppliers through to customers. This domain provides a structured approach for modeling supplier networks, logistics operations, inventory management, and supply chain processes, enabling supply chain-centric analysis that drives strategic planning, operational efficiency, and resilience.
The domain extends the Orthogramic Metamodel by providing deeper insights into supply chain structures, network dynamics, and process flows, enabling organizations to align their capabilities, value streams, and strategies with supply chain realities and objectives.
The Supply Chain Domain enables organizations to:
Model and analyze the end-to-end supply chain network structure, including suppliers, partners, and logistics operations
Map key supply chain processes and their integration points with other business processes
Support data-driven decision making about network design, supplier selection, and inventory policies
Drive resilience through improved visibility into supply chain risks and vulnerabilities
Measure and improve supply chain performance across cost, service, quality, and sustainability dimensions
Provide a structured foundation for supply chain governance and optimization
Align supply chain design with strategic business objectives and customer requirements
Supplier Network
A structured arrangement of supplier relationships that provide goods, services, or materials to the organization. Supplier networks enable categorization and management of external organizations that contribute to the supply chain.
Supply Chain Process
A defined sequence of activities that transform inputs into outputs within the supply chain context, such as sourcing, production planning, or order fulfillment. Process mapping provides visibility into how work flows through the supply chain.
Logistics Network
The physical facilities, transportation connections, and distribution channels through which materials and products flow to reach customers. Logistics network analysis provides insights into physical movement optimization.
Inventory Management
The approaches, policies, and systems used to maintain optimal inventory levels throughout the supply chain. Inventory analysis supports balancing cost efficiency with service level requirements.
Domain Attributes
Basic identification: title, description, supplyChainCategory
Organizational alignment: orgUnitTitle, orgUnitRoles, supplyChainScope
Geographic factors: geographicCoverage, locationStrategy
Performance characteristics: leadTime, volumeCapacity, costStructure
Resilience factors: flexibilityRating, resilienceRating, riskProfile
Sustainability aspects: sustainabilityRating, environmentalImpact
Technology enablement: technologyEnablers, digitalMaturity
Strategic implications: strategicImportance, competitiveAdvantage
Domain Elements
Supplier Network Element
Provides a structured view of supplier relationships:
Supplier categorization and tiering
Geographic distribution and concentration
Critical supplier identification
Selection criteria and governance models
Performance measurement and management
Relationship types and development approaches
Supply Chain Process Element
Maps the key processes that drive supply chain operations:
Process types and ownership
Activity sequences and decision points
Inputs, outputs, and transformations
Dependencies and integration points
Performance metrics and control mechanisms
Technology support and automation opportunities
Logistics Network Element
Evaluates the physical movement infrastructure:
Network nodes and flow patterns
Transportation modes and providers
Capacity constraints and utilization
Service level definitions and performance
Cost structures and optimization
Environmental impacts and sustainability
Inventory Management Element
Analyzes the approaches to inventory optimization:
Inventory categories and purposes
Policy frameworks and target levels
Location strategies and visibility systems
Cost structures and performance metrics
Risk management approaches
Optimization techniques and technologies
Getting Started
Begin by identifying and documenting key supply chain categories
Select a high-priority supply chain element and map its supplier network
Document the core supply chain processes and their interdependencies
Map the logistics network configuration and performance characteristics
Define inventory management approaches and their strategic rationale
Best Practices
Ensure supply chain elements have clear scope and boundary definitions
Base supply chain analysis on quantitative metrics where possible
Link supply chain performance to customer and financial outcomes
Connect supply chain elements to strategic objectives and capabilities
Involve multiple functions in supply chain analysis to avoid siloed perspectives
Maintain a balance between cost efficiency and resilience considerations
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Creating overly complex supply chain models that hinder actionable insights
Focusing exclusively on internal supply chain operations without external perspective
Failing to connect supply chain analysis to strategic and operational domains
Not updating supply chain models as network dynamics and requirements evolve
Overlooking technology enablement opportunities within supply chain operations
Neglecting sustainability and social responsibility dimensions of supply chain management
The Supply Chain Domain schema is expected to evolve with emerging practices in supply chain management. Future extensions may include:
Digital supply chain twin modeling
Circular economy supply chain frameworks
AI-powered supply chain optimization
Blockchain-enabled supply chain transparency
Climate-resilient supply network design
Predictive supply chain risk analytics
Organizations should plan for these evolutions by maintaining clean taxonomies and clear relationship models in their current implementation.
The Supply Chain Domain extends the Orthogramic Metamodel with a robust framework for modeling and managing supply chain aspects of business architecture. By providing structured schemas for supplier networks, supply chain processes, logistics networks, and inventory management, it enables organizations to systematically align their supply chain design with strategic objectives and operational requirements.
The integration with the Strategic Response Model ensures that supply chain insights drive strategic decision-making and organizational change. This domain complements other domains by focusing on the external network and flow dimensions that enable organizational activities, providing critical context for strategic planning and operational execution.
Organizations can use this domain to develop a more comprehensive understanding of their supply chain ecosystem, identify optimization opportunities, and ensure that strategic initiatives properly account for supply chain capabilities and constraints.
{
"supplyChainID": "SC-MFG-001",
"title": "Global Electronics Manufacturing Supply Chain",
"description": "End-to-end supply chain for consumer electronics manufacturing, including component sourcing, assembly operations, distribution networks, and aftermarket service fulfillment.",
"supplyChainCategory": "manufacturing",
"orgUnitTitle": "Global Supply Chain Management",
"orgUnitRoles": ["Chief Supply Chain Officer", "Director of Global Sourcing", "Logistics Operations Manager"],
"supplyChainScope": "enterprise",
"geographicCoverage": {
"regions": ["North America", "Europe", "Asia-Pacific", "Southeast Asia"],
"countries": ["United States", "China", "Vietnam", "Germany", "Malaysia", "Mexico"],
"coverageType": "global",
"expansionPlans": "Evaluating new manufacturing hub in Eastern Europe by 2026"
},
"locationStrategy": {
"strategyType": "proximity-to-supply",
"strategyDescription": "Primary manufacturing facilities positioned near key semiconductor and component suppliers with regional distribution centers close to major markets",
"evaluationCriteria": ["Supplier ecosystem density", "Labor expertise", "Logistics infrastructure", "Tax incentives"]
},
"leadTime": {
"endToEndLeadTime": "45-60 days",
"componentLeadTimes": [
{
"componentName": "Semiconductor procurement",
"duration": "30-45 days",
"variability": "High - affected by global shortages"
},
{
"componentName": "Final assembly",
"duration": "7 days",
"variability": "Low"
},
{
"componentName": "Distribution to regional centers",
"duration": "5-10 days",
"variability": "Medium - affected by port congestion"
}
],
"leadTimeReliability": "72% on-time delivery to commitment dates",
"improvementTargets": "Reduce end-to-end lead time to 35 days by Q4 2026"
},
"volumeCapacity": {
"normalCapacity": "1.2 million units per month",
"peakCapacity": "1.5 million units per month",
"unitOfMeasure": "Finished device units",
"utilizationRate": "83% average utilization",
"capacityConstraints": ["Semiconductor availability", "Skilled labor in Vietnam facility", "Q4 shipping capacity"],
"expansionPlans": "15% capacity increase planned for Vietnam facility in 2026"
},
"costStructure": {
"totalCost": "$425M annual supply chain operational cost",
"costComponents": [
{
"componentName": "Materials and components",
"amount": "$312M",
"percentage": 73.4
},
{
"componentName": "Manufacturing labor",
"amount": "$48M",
"percentage": 11.3
},
{
"componentName": "Logistics and transportation",
"amount": "$36M",
"percentage": 8.5
},
{
"componentName": "Warehousing and inventory",
"amount": "$19M",
"percentage": 4.5
},
{
"componentName": "Supply chain management",
"amount": "$10M",
"percentage": 2.3
}
],
"costTrends": "Component costs decreasing 3% annually, logistics costs increasing 7% annually",
"costReductionTargets": "8% total cost reduction target over next 24 months"
},
"flexibilityRating": {
"overallRating": "moderate",
"volumeFlexibility": "high",
"mixFlexibility": "moderate",
"newProductFlexibility": "low",
"improvementFocus": "Enhancing new product introduction capabilities through modular manufacturing processes"
},
"resilienceRating": {
"overallRating": "moderate",
"redundancyLevel": "low",
"diversificationLevel": "moderate",
"visibilityLevel": "high",
"recoveryCapability": "moderate",
"resilienceInvestments": ["Secondary supplier qualification program", "Regional inventory buffers", "Multi-modal transportation capability"]
},
"riskProfile": {
"overallRiskLevel": "high",
"keyRiskFactors": [
{
"factorName": "Semiconductor supply constraints",
"riskLevel": "high",
"mitigationApproach": "Long-term contracts, strategic inventory, supplier diversification"
},
{
"factorName": "Geopolitical disruption in Asia",
"riskLevel": "high",
"mitigationApproach": "Manufacturing footprint diversification, scenario planning"
},
{
"factorName": "Ocean freight capacity and pricing volatility",
"riskLevel": "moderate",
"mitigationApproach": "Multi-modal options, contract diversification, selective air freight"
}
],
"riskMonitoringApproach": "Monthly risk review with quarterly simulation and mitigation updates"
},
"sustainabilityRating": {
"overallRating": "moderate",
"carbonFootprint": "187,000 metric tons CO2e annually",
"wasteReduction": "72% manufacturing waste diverted from landfill",
"socialResponsibility": "Tier 1 suppliers 100% audited for labor practices",
"sustainabilityInitiatives": ["Renewable energy transition at owned facilities", "Packaging redesign program", "Scope 3 emissions tracking implementation"],
"sustainabilityReporting": "Annual sustainability report with science-based targets"
},
"environmentalImpact": {
"carbonEmissions": "187,000 metric tons CO2e annually",
"waterUsage": "450 million gallons annually",
"wasteGeneration": "5,200 tons annually",
"resourceConsumption": "Critical minerals: 860 tons annually",
"environmentalCompliance": "100% compliance with regulated standards, 85% compliance with voluntary standards",
"reductionTargets": ["30% carbon reduction by 2028", "20% water reduction by 2027", "Zero waste to landfill by 2029"]
},
"qualityMetrics": [
{
"metricName": "First Pass Yield",
"metricDescription": "Percentage of units passing quality testing on first attempt",
"currentValue": "94.6%",
"targetValue": "97%",
"trend": "improving"
},
{
"metricName": "Defect Rate",
"metricDescription": "Defects per million opportunities",
"currentValue": "350 DPMO",
"targetValue": "200 DPMO",
"trend": "improving"
},
{
"metricName": "Customer Return Rate",
"metricDescription": "Percentage of shipped products returned due to quality issues",
"currentValue": "1.8%",
"targetValue": "1.0%",
"trend": "stable"
}
],
"technologyEnablers": [
{
"technologyName": "Supply Chain Control Tower",
"technologyPurpose": "End-to-end visibility and exception management",
"implementationStatus": "operational",
"businessImpact": "45% reduction in supply disruption resolution time"
},
{
"technologyName": "Digital Twin Simulation",
"technologyPurpose": "Network design and scenario planning",
"implementationStatus": "implementing",
"businessImpact": "Expected 12% improvement in network efficiency"
},
{
"technologyName": "Machine Learning Demand Forecasting",
"technologyPurpose": "Improved demand prediction accuracy",
"implementationStatus": "operational",
"businessImpact": "18% reduction in forecast error"
}
],
"digitalMaturity": {
"overallMaturity": "defined",
"dataVisibility": "advanced",
"processAutomation": "developing",
"advancedAnalytics": "defined",
"digitalRoadmap": "Digital supply chain transformation program with focus on process automation and predictive analytics through 2027"
},
"maturityLevel": {
"overallMaturity": "defined",
"processMaturity": "managed",
"performanceManagement": "defined",
"maturityAssessmentDate": "2025-02-15"
},
"improvementOpportunities": [
{
"opportunityName": "Supplier Collaboration Platform",
"opportunityDescription": "Implementation of real-time collaboration tools for design and planning with key suppliers",
"potentialImpact": "high",
"implementationComplexity": "medium",
"status": "planning"
},
{
"opportunityName": "New Product Introduction Process Redesign",
"opportunityDescription": "Streamlining of supply chain integration in NPI to reduce time-to-market",
"potentialImpact": "high",
"implementationComplexity": "high",
"status": "evaluating"
},
{
"opportunityName": "Logistics Network Optimization",
"opportunityDescription": "Comprehensive review and redesign of global distribution network",
"potentialImpact": "medium",
"implementationComplexity": "high",
"status": "planning"
}
],
"strategicImportance": {
"importanceLevel": "critical",
"strategicContribution": "Supply chain capabilities are central to product availability, cost competitiveness, and sustainability goals",
"alignmentWithObjectives": [
{
"objectiveID": "SO-2025-02",
"alignmentDescription": "Supply chain digitalization supports corporate digital transformation objective"
},
{
"objectiveID": "SO-2025-04",
"alignmentDescription": "Sustainability initiatives in supply chain support corporate ESG objectives"
}
]
},
"competitiveAdvantage": {
"advantageLevel": "advantage",
"advantageSources": ["Advanced visibility technology", "Supplier relationship depth", "Multi-region manufacturing flexibility"],
"competitiveBenchmarking": "Leading in technology adoption and visibility, lagging in new product flexibility compared to key competitors",
"sustainabilityOfAdvantage": "Technology advantage requires ongoing investment, relationship advantage sustainable with continued engagement"
},
"dependencies": [
{
"dependencyType": "Critical",
"domainType": "Capability",
"entityID": "CAP-SC-003",
"description": "Advanced procurement capability"
},
{
"dependencyType": "Important",
"domainType": "Technology",
"entityID": "TECH-007",
"description": "Supply chain planning and control tower systems"
}
],
"relatedSupplyChainElements": [
{
"elementID": "SC-MFG-002",
"relationshipType": "upstream",
"relationshipStrength": 4,
"description": "Component supplier network for semiconductors"
},
{
"elementID": "SC-LOG-001",
"relationshipType": "downstream",
"relationshipStrength": 5,
"description": "Global distribution network for finished goods"
}
],
"governanceModel": {
"governanceStructure": "Cross-functional Supply Chain Leadership Council with regional representation",
"decisionRights": "Network design decisions centralized, execution decisions regionalized",
"performanceReviewProcess": "Monthly operational reviews, quarterly strategic reviews",
"continuousImprovement": "Dedicated supply chain excellence team with agile improvement methodology"
}
} |
{
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
"title": "Supply Chain-Strategy Relationship Schema",
"description": "Schema for relationships between Supply Chain domain and Strategy domain",
"type": "object",
"required": ["relationshipID", "supplyChainID", "title", "relationshipType"],
"properties": {
"relationshipID": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Unique identifier for this relationship"
},
"supplyChainID": {
"type": "string",
"description": "ID of the supply chain element"
},
"title": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Name of the strategy"
},
"relationshipType": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Nature of the supply chain influence on strategy",
"enum": ["enabler", "constraint", "differentiator", "cost-driver", "risk-factor", "capability-builder", "collaborative-advantage", "other"]
},
"relationshipStrength": {
"type": "integer",
"description": "Strength of influence (1-5)",
"minimum": 1,
"maximum": 5
},
"supplyChainFactors": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Supply chain factors influencing this strategy",
"items": {
"type": "string"
}
},
"strategicAlignment": {
"type": "object",
"description": "How supply chain aligns with strategy",
"properties": {
"alignmentDescription": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Description of alignment"
},
"alignmentLevel": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Level of alignment",
"enum": ["misaligned", "partially-aligned", "mostly-aligned", "fully-aligned"]
},
"alignmentGaps": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Areas where alignment is lacking",
"items": {
"type": "string"
}
},
"alignmentPlan": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Plan to improve alignment"
}
}
},
"strategicObjectives": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Strategic objectives affected by supply chain",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"objectiveID": {
"type": "string",
"description": "ID of strategic objective"
},
"supplyChainContribution": {
"type": "string",
"description": "How supply chain contributes to objective"
},
"importanceLevel": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Importance to objective",
"enum": ["minor", "moderate", "significant", "critical"]
}
}
}
},
"competitivePositioning": {
"type": "object",
"description": "How supply chain affects competitive position",
"properties": {
"positioningRole": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Role in competitive positioning"
},
"competitiveAdvantages": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Competitive advantages created",
"items": {
"type": "string"
}
},
"competitiveDisadvantages": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Competitive disadvantages created",
"items": {
"type": "string"
}
},
"benchmarking": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Comparison to competitors"
}
}
},
"strategyConstraints": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Constraints imposed by supply chain",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"constraintDescription": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Description of constraint"
},
"impactLevel": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Level of impact",
"enum": ["minor", "moderate", "significant", "severe"]
},
"mitigationApproach": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Approach to address constraint"
}
}
}
},
"strategicInvestments": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Strategic investments in supply chain",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"investmentName": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Name of investment"
},
"investmentDescription": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Description of investment"
},
"investmentRationale": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Strategic rationale"
},
"expectedOutcomes": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Anticipated results"
}
}
}
},
"performanceMetrics": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Metrics for measuring strategic impact",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"metricName": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Name of metric"
},
"metricDescription": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Description of what is measured"
},
"currentValue": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Current performance"
},
"targetValue": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Target performance"
}
}
}
}
}
}
|
{
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
"title": "Supply Chain-Capability Relationship Schema",
"description": "Schema for relationships between Supply Chain domain and Capability domain",
"type": "object",
"required": ["relationshipID", "supplyChainID", "title", "relationshipType"],
"properties": {
"relationshipID": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Unique identifier for this relationship"
},
"supplyChainID": {
"type": "string",
"description": "ID of the supply chain element"
},
"title": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Name of the capability"
},
"relationshipType": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Nature of the relationship",
"enum": ["enabling", "supporting", "dependent", "enhancing", "limiting", "critical", "developing", "other"]
},
"relationshipStrength": {
"type": "integer",
"description": "Importance of this relationship (1-5)",
"minimum": 1,
"maximum": 5
},
"capabilityContribution": {
"type": "string",
"description": "How capability contributes to supply chain"
},
"capabilityRequirements": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Requirements the supply chain places on capability",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"requirementDescription": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Description of requirement"
},
"importance": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Importance level",
"enum": ["low", "medium", "high", "critical"]
},
"fulfillmentLevel": {
"type": "string",
"description": "How well requirement is met",
"enum": ["unmet", "partially-met", "mostly-met", "fully-met"]
},
"improvementNeeds": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Areas needing improvement"
}
}
}
},
"capabilityMaturity": {
"type": "object",
"description": "Maturity of capability for supply chain needs",
"properties": {
"maturityLevel": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Current maturity assessment",
"enum": ["initial", "developing", "defined", "managed", "optimizing"]
},
"maturityGaps": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Key maturity gaps",
"items": {
"type": "string"
}
},
"maturityTargets": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Target maturity state"
},
"developmentRoadmap": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Plan for capability development"
}
}
},
"performanceMetrics": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Metrics for measuring capability contribution",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"metricName": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Name of metric"
},
"metricDescription": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Description of what is measured"
},
"currentValue": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Current performance"
},
"targetValue": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Target performance"
},
"impactOnSupplyChain": {
"type": "string",
"description": "How this metric affects supply chain"
}
}
}
},
"improvementInitiatives": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Initiatives to improve capability for supply chain",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"initiativeName": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Name of initiative"
},
"initiativeDescription": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Description of initiative"
},
"expectedBenefits": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Supply chain benefits expected"
},
"status": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Current status",
"enum": ["planned", "in-progress", "completed", "ongoing"]
}
}
}
},
"resourceAllocation": {
"type": "object",
"description": "Resources allocated to capability for supply chain",
"properties": {
"budgetAllocation": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Budget allocated"
},
"personnelAllocation": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Personnel allocated"
},
"technologyInvestment": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Technology investments"
},
"allocationRationale": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Rationale for resource allocation"
}
}
},
"governanceModel": {
"type": "string",
"description": "How capability is governed for supply chain needs"
}
}
}
|
Field | Type | Required | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| string | Yes | Unique identifier for the supply chain element | "SC-MFG-001" |
| string | Yes | The name or title of the supply chain element | "Global Electronics Manufacturing Supply Chain" |
| string | Yes | A detailed explanation of the supply chain element | "End-to-end supply chain for consumer electronics manufacturing, including component sourcing, assembly operations, distribution networks, and aftermarket service fulfillment." |
| string | Yes | Classification within supply network | "manufacturing" |
| string | Yes | The organization unit responsible for this supply chain element | "Global Supply Chain Management" |
| array of string | No | Specific roles within the organization unit that manage this supply chain element | ["Chief Supply Chain Officer", "Director of Global Sourcing"] |
| string | No | Organizational scope covered by this supply chain element | "enterprise" |
| object | No | Geographic span of the supply chain element | {"regions": ["North America", "Asia-Pacific"], "coverageType": "global"} |
| object | No | Approach to geographic positioning | {"strategyType": "proximity-to-supply", "strategyDescription": "Located near key suppliers"} |
| object | No | Time required for fulfillment | {"endToEndLeadTime": "45-60 days", "leadTimeReliability": "72%"} |
| object | No | Throughput capability | {"normalCapacity": "1.2 million units per month", "utilizationRate": "83%"} |
| object | No | Supply chain cost breakdown | {"totalCost": "$425M annual", "costComponents": [{...}]} |
| object | No | Adaptability to change | {"overallRating": "moderate", "volumeFlexibility": "high"} |
| object | No | Ability to withstand disruption | {"overallRating": "moderate", "redundancyLevel": "low"} |
| object | No | Supply chain risk characteristics | {"overallRiskLevel": "high", "keyRiskFactors": [{...}]} |
| object | No | Environmental and social performance | {"overallRating": "moderate", "carbonFootprint": "187,000 metric tons CO2e"} |
| object | No | Environmental effects of operations | {"carbonEmissions": "187,000 metric tons CO2e", "wasteGeneration": "5,200 tons"} |
| array of objects | No | Quality performance measures | [{"metricName": "First Pass Yield", "currentValue": "94.6%"}] |
| array of objects | No | Supporting technologies | [{"technologyName": "Supply Chain Control Tower", "businessImpact": "45% reduction"}] |
| object | No | Level of digital technology adoption | {"overallMaturity": "defined", "dataVisibility": "advanced"} |
| object | No | Current development stage | {"overallMaturity": "defined", "processMaturity": "managed"} |
| array of objects | No | Areas for enhancement | [{"opportunityName": "Supplier Collaboration Platform", "potentialImpact": "high"}] |
| object | No | Significance to business strategy | {"importanceLevel": "critical", "strategicContribution": "Central to product availability"} |
| object | No | How supply chain creates competitive advantage | {"advantageLevel": "advantage", "advantageSources": ["Advanced visibility technology"]} |
| array of objects | No | Other domains, processes, or systems supporting this supply chain element | [{"dependencyType": "Critical", "domainType": "Capability", "entityID": "CAP-SC-003"}] |
| array of objects | No | Other supply chain elements with relationships to this one | [{"elementID": "SC-MFG-002", "relationshipType": "upstream"}] |
| object | No | How the supply chain is governed | {"governanceStructure": "Cross-functional Supply Chain Leadership Council"} |
Field | Type | Required | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| string | Yes | Unique identifier for the supplier network | "SN-ELECT-001" |
| string | Yes | Name of the supplier network | "Electronics Component Supplier Network" |
| string | Yes | Detailed explanation of the supplier network | "Global network of semiconductor and electronic component suppliers" |
| string | Yes | The organization unit responsible for this supplier network | "Strategic Sourcing Department" |
| string | No | ID of the supply chain domain this network belongs to | "SC-MFG-001" |
| array of objects | No | Types of suppliers in the network | [{"categoryName": "Semiconductor Manufacturers", "spendPercentage": 45}] |
| array of objects | No | Hierarchical arrangement of suppliers | [{"tierLevel": "tier-1", "supplierCount": 38, "visibilityLevel": "full"}] |
| object | No | Geographic distribution of suppliers | {"regions": [{"regionName": "Asia-Pacific", "supplierCount": 64}]} |
| array of objects | No | Items with single source of supply | [{"itemName": "Custom ASIC", "criticality": "high"}] |
| array of objects | No | Strategically important suppliers | [{"supplierName": "TechSemi Inc.", "criticality": "very-high"}] |
| array of objects | No | Criteria for supplier selection | [{"criterionName": "Quality Certification", "weightingFactor": 25}] |
| array of objects | No | Metrics for measuring supplier performance | [{"metricName": "On-time Delivery", "targetValue": "98%"}] |
| array of objects | No | Types of supplier relationships | [{"relationshipType": "strategic", "supplierCount": 12}] |
| object | No | How the supplier network is governed | {"governanceStructure": "Quarterly performance review council"} |
| object | No | Risk characteristics of supplier network | {"overallRiskLevel": "high", "riskCategories": [{...}]} |
| object | No | Sustainability expectations for suppliers | {"environmentalRequirements": ["ISO 14001 certification"]} |
| object | No | Technology integration with suppliers | {"integrationLevel": "moderate", "integrationPlatforms": ["EDI", "Supplier Portal"]} |
| object | No | How collaboration with suppliers is structured | {"collaborationAreas": ["New product development", "Quality improvement"]} |
| object | No | Analysis of supplier spending | {"totalAnnualSpend": "$312M", "spendConcentration": "Top 10 suppliers represent 62% of spend"} |
| object | No | Management of supplier contracts | {"contractTypes": ["Long-term agreements", "Spot contracts"]} |
| array of objects | No | Initiatives to improve supplier network | [{"initiativeName": "Supplier Digital Enablement", "expectedBenefits": "Improved visibility and collaboration"}] |
Field | Type | Required | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| string | Yes | Unique identifier for the supply chain process | "SCP-S2P-001" |
| string | Yes | Name of the supply chain process | "Source-to-Pay Process" |
| string | Yes | Detailed explanation of the supply chain process | "End-to-end procurement process from supplier selection through payment" |
| string | Yes | The organization unit responsible for this process | "Procurement Operations" |
| string | No | ID of the supply chain domain this process belongs to | "SC-MFG-001" |
| string | No | Category of process | "sourcing" |
| string | No | Individual or role responsible for the process | "Director of Procurement Operations" |
| object | No | Boundaries of the process | {"startPoint": "Demand identification", "endPoint": "Supplier payment"} |
| array of objects | No | Key activities involved in the process | [{"stepID": "S2P-01", "stepName": "Requisition Creation", "sequenceNumber": 1}] |
| array of objects | No | Required inputs to the process | [{"inputName": "Approved Budget", "inputSource": "Finance Department"}] |
| array of objects | No | Resulting outputs from the process | [{"outputName": "Purchase Order", "outputDestination": "Supplier"}] |
| array of objects | No | Control mechanisms for the process | [{"controlName": "Approval Workflow", "controlType": "preventive"}] |
| array of objects | No | Related processes or dependencies | [{"dependencyID": "SCP-DEM-001", "dependencyType": "predecessor"}] |
| array of objects | No | Performance measures for the process | [{"metricName": "Purchase Order Cycle Time", "currentValue": "3.2 days"}] |
| array of objects | No | Specific risks related to this process | [{"riskName": "Unauthorized Purchases", "likelihood": "low", "impact": "moderate"}] |
| array of objects | No | Opportunities to improve the process | [{"opportunityName": "Touchless Processing", "potentialBenefits": "65% reduction in manual effort"}] |
| array of objects | No | Technologies supporting this process | [{"technologyName": "Procure-to-Pay System", "effectivenessAssessment": "effective"}] |
| object | No | Level of process automation | {"overallAutomation": "partially-automated", "automationByStep": [{...}]} |
| object | No | Level of process standardization | {"standardizationLevel": "mostly-standardized", "complianceLevel": "high"} |
| array of objects | No | Training needed for this process | [{"roleTitle": "Procurement Specialist", "trainingNeeds": ["System navigation", "Negotiation skills"]}] |
| object | No | Maturity assessment of the process | {"maturityLevel": "defined", "maturityAssessmentDate": "2025-02-15"} |
Field | Type | Required | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| string | Yes | Unique identifier for the logistics network | "LN-GLOBAL-001" |
| string | Yes | Name of the logistics network | "Global Distribution Network" |
| string | Yes | Detailed explanation of the logistics network | "Network of distribution centers and transportation links to deliver finished products to customers worldwide" |
| string | Yes | The organization unit responsible for this logistics network | "Global Logistics Operations" |
| string | No | ID of the supply chain domain this network belongs to | "SC-MFG-001" |
| string | No | Category of logistics network | "distribution" |
| array of objects | No | Key facilities and locations in the network | [{"nodeID": "DC-NA-001", "nodeName": "Memphis Distribution Center", "nodeType": "distribution-center"}] |
| array of objects | No | Connections between nodes in the network | [{"connectionID": "CONN-001", "sourceNodeID": "DC-NA-001", "transportationMode": "road"}] |
| array of objects | No | Methods of transport used in the network | [{"modeName": "ocean", "utilizationPercentage": 65, "costPercentage": 42}] |
| object | No | Throughput capabilities of the network | {"overallCapacity": "1.5M units monthly", "utilizationRate": "78%"} |
| array of objects | No | Performance standards for the network | [{"serviceName": "Standard Delivery", "performanceMetrics": [{...}]}] |
| object | No | Cost performance of the logistics network | {"totalLogisticsCost": "$36M annually", "costPerUnit": "$4.82"} |
| object | No | Environmental impact of the logistics network | {"totalCarbonEmissions": "76,000 metric tons CO2e annually"} |
| object | No | Adaptability of the logistics network to change | {"overallFlexibility": "moderate", "volumeFlexibility": "high"} |
| object | No | Visibility into logistics network operations | {"overallVisibility": "high", "trackingCapabilities": "Real-time tracking of 95% of shipments"} |
| array of objects | No | Third-party logistics providers in the network | [{"providerName": "Global Express Logistics", "servicesProvided": ["International freight", "Customs clearance"]}] |
| object | No | Strategy for improving the logistics network | {"optimizationFocus": ["Cost reduction", "Service level improvement"]} |
| object | No | Ability of the network to withstand disruptions | {"resilienceRating": "moderate", "vulnerabilityPoints": ["Port congestion", "Weather disruptions"]} |
| array of objects | No | Regulatory and compliance requirements | [{"requirementName": "International Trade Compliance", "complianceStatus": "compliant"}] |
Field | Type | Required | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| string | Yes | Unique identifier for the inventory management element | "INV-FG-001" |
| string | Yes | Type of inventory | "finished-goods" |
| string | Yes | Detailed explanation of the inventory management element | "Management of finished electronic products inventory across global distribution network" |
| string | Yes | The organization unit responsible for this inventory | "Global Inventory Management" |
| string | No | ID of the supply chain domain this inventory belongs to | "SC-MFG-001" |
| string | No | Strategic purpose of the inventory | "cycle" |
| object | No | Management approach for the inventory | {"policyType": "min-max", "policyDescription": "Regional minimum and maximum levels based on demand patterns"} |
| object | No | Quantity parameters for the inventory | {"averageInventory": "32 days of supply", "safetyStockLevel": "14 days of supply"} |
| object | No | Rate of inventory usage | {"turnoverRate": "11.4 times annually", "daysOfSupply": "32 days"} |
| object | No | Costs associated with inventory | {"totalInventoryValue": "$86M", "holdingCost": "21% of value annually"} |
| array of objects | No | Storage locations for inventory | [{"locationName": "Memphis DC", "inventoryValue": "$24M", "inventoryPercentage": 28}] |
| object | No | Tracking capabilities for inventory | {"visibilityLevel": "high", "trackingMethods": ["RFID", "WMS"], "dataAccuracy": "98.7%"} |
| object | No | Risk of inventory depletion | {"overallRisk": "moderate", "serviceLevel": "98.5% target", "actualServiceLevel": "97.2%"} |
| object | No | Risk of inventory obsolescence | {"overallRisk": "high", "obsolescenceRate": "4.2% annually"} |
| object | No | Approach to inventory improvement | {"optimizationObjectives": ["Reduce total inventory by 15%", "Maintain 98.5% service level"]} |
| array of objects | No | Metrics for measuring inventory performance | [{"metricName": "Inventory Accuracy", "currentValue": "98.7%", "targetValue": "99.5%"}] |
| object | No | Approach to planning inventory based on demand | {"forecastingMethod": "Statistical with machine learning", "forecastAccuracy": "78% at SKU level"} |
| object | No | Classification of inventory items | {"classificationMethod": "abc", "categoryBreakdown": [{...}]} |
| object | No | Quality management for inventory | {"inspectionProcess": "Sample-based quality inspection at receiving", "defectRate": "0.8%"} |
| object | No | Governance of inventory management | {"governanceStructure": "Inventory Review Board with monthly meetings", "auditingApproach": "Quarterly cycle counts"} |
Field | Type | Required | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| string | Yes | Unique identifier for this relationship | "REL-SC-STR-001" |
| string | Yes | ID of the supply chain element | "SC-MFG-001" |
| string | Yes | Name of the strategy | "Digital Transformation Strategy" |
| string | Yes | Nature of the supply chain influence on strategy | "enabler" |
| integer | No | Strength of influence (1-5) | 4 |
| array of string | No | Supply chain factors influencing this strategy | ["Advanced visibility capabilities", "Digital supplier integration"] |
| object | No | How supply chain aligns with strategy | {"alignmentDescription": "Supply chain digitalization enables broader transformation", "alignmentLevel": "mostly-aligned"} |
| array of objects | No | Strategic objectives affected by supply chain | [{"objectiveID": "SO-2025-02", "supplyChainContribution": "Provides digital foundation"}] |
| object | No | How supply chain affects competitive position | {"positioningRole": "Differentiation through superior delivery reliability", "competitiveAdvantages": ["Faster time-to-market", "Higher delivery reliability"]} |
| array of objects | No | Constraints imposed by supply chain | [{"constraintDescription": "Manufacturing footprint limits market entry speed", "impactLevel": "moderate"}] |
| array of objects | No | Strategic investments in supply chain | [{"investmentName": "Supply Chain Control Tower", "investmentRationale": "Enable end-to-end visibility"}] |
| array of objects | No | Metrics for measuring strategic impact | [{"metricName": "Time-to-Market", "currentValue": "120 days", "targetValue": "90 days"}] |
Field | Type | Required | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| string | Yes | Unique identifier for this relationship | "REL-SC-CAP-001" |
| string | Yes | ID of the supply chain element | "SC-MFG-001" |
| string | Yes | Name of the capability | "Advanced Procurement" |
| string | Yes | Nature of the relationship | "critical" |
| integer | No | Importance of this relationship (1-5) | 5 |
| string | No | How capability contributes to supply chain | "Ensures strategic sourcing and supplier selection" |
| array of objects | No | Requirements the supply chain places on capability | [{"requirementDescription": "AI-powered supplier risk assessment", "importance": "high"}] |
| object | No | Maturity of capability for supply chain needs | {"maturityLevel": "defined", "maturityGaps": ["Digital skills", "Automation"]} |
| array of objects | No | Metrics for measuring capability contribution | [{"metricName": "Supplier Quality Index", "currentValue": "87/100", "targetValue": "92/100"}] |
| array of objects | No | Initiatives to improve capability for supply chain | [{"initiativeName": "Digital Procurement Transformation", "expectedBenefits": "30% reduction in procurement cycle time"}] |
| object | No | Resources allocated to capability for supply chain | {"budgetAllocation": "$4.2M annually", "personnelAllocation": "28 FTEs"} |
| string | No | How capability is governed for supply chain needs | "Quarterly capability review with defined performance metrics" |