The Technology Domain represents the technical components and infrastructure that enable business operations. This domain focuses on applications, services, infrastructure elements, and technology standards that support organizational capabilities and business processes. It aligns with TOGAF's Technology Architecture while maintaining compatibility with the Orthogramic schema approach.
The Technology Domain enables organizations to:
Map technology components to business capabilities and strategic objectives
Document technical services and their relationships to business services
Analyze technology infrastructure to ensure it meets operational requirements
Establish and manage technology standards for consistency and interoperability
Support data-driven decision making about technology investments and priorities
Enable technology portfolio management and lifecycle planning
Provide a structured foundation for technology governance and risk management
A software application or system that provides specific functionality to support business operations. Application components are typically discrete software elements that can be deployed independently but may interact with other components.
A defined technical function or capability provided by technology components that can be consumed by other technology components, applications, or business processes. Technology services represent the operational capabilities provided by technology.
The foundational hardware, networks, platforms, and environments that support applications and services. Infrastructure elements represent the physical and virtual technology assets that enable all other technology operations.
A formal specification, requirement, or approved approach for technology implementation, integration, or management. Standards ensure consistency, interoperability, and compliance across the technology landscape.
Basic identification: title, description, technologyType
Organizational alignment: orgUnitTitle, orgUnitRoles
Status information: currentState, targetState
Ownership: businessOwner, technicalOwner
Management factors: supportModel, lifecycle
External relationships: vendors, standards
Financial aspects: costs
Risk considerations: risks, securityClassification
Performance characteristics: performanceRequirements
Compliance elements: complianceRequirements
Strategic factors: strategicAlignment
Provides a structured representation of software applications:
Application identification and categorization
Business capabilities supported
Functional descriptions and interfaces
Data management aspects
Technical architecture and deployment
Performance and scalability characteristics
Development and lifecycle information
Maps the technical services that provide capabilities:
Service identification and categorization
Service levels and performance parameters
Service consumers and providers
Technical implementation details
Security and control mechanisms
Dependencies and availability requirements
Cost and monitoring approaches
Evaluates the physical and virtual technology assets:
Infrastructure identification and categorization
Location and environment information
Capacity and utilization metrics
Management responsibilities and backup strategies
Recovery capabilities and specifications
Maintenance and lifecycle planning
Cost structures and technical details
Defines the accepted technology practices and patterns:
Standard identification and categorization
Version information and status
Compliance requirements and enforcement
Exception handling and usage guidelines
Benefits and alternative options
Governance and management approaches
The Technology Domain extends the Orthogramic Metamodel with a comprehensive framework for modeling and managing the technical components that enable business operations. By providing structured schemas for applications, technology services, infrastructure, and standards, it enables organizations to systematically align their technology landscape with strategic objectives and operational requirements.
The integration with the Strategic Response Model ensures that technology insights drive strategic decision-making and organizational change. This domain complements other domains by focusing on the technical foundation that supports organizational activities, providing critical context for strategic planning and operational execution.
Organizations can use this domain to develop a more comprehensive understanding of their technology ecosystem, identify optimization opportunities, and ensure that technology investments are properly aligned with business needs and strategic priorities. The domain's alignment with TOGAF's Technology Architecture component enables organizations to leverage established enterprise architecture methods while maintaining compatibility with the Orthogramic schema approach.
{
"technologyID": "TECH-API-001",
"title": "Enterprise API Management Platform",
"description": "Centralized platform for designing, implementing, publishing, and monitoring APIs across the organization, enabling secure integration between internal and external systems.",
"technologyType": "infrastructure-software",
"orgUnitTitle": "Enterprise Architecture & Integration",
"orgUnitRoles": [
"API Platform Manager",
"Integration Architect",
"Security Architect"
],
"technologyLayer": "integration",
"currentState": "operational",
"targetState": "enhance with AI-driven API analytics and automated documentation generation",
"businessOwner": "Chief Digital Officer",
"technicalOwner": "VP of Enterprise Architecture",
"supportModel": "24/7 operational support with specialized integration team and vendor escalation path",
"lifecycle": "growth",
"vendors": [
"MuleSoft",
"Apigee"
],
"standards": [
"REST API Design Standards",
"OAuth 2.0",
"OpenAPI 3.0"
],
"costs": {
"implementationCost": "$1.8M",
"annualLicensing": "$750K",
"annualOperational": "$450K"
},
"risks": [
"API security vulnerabilities",
"Scalability limitations during peak loads",
"Developer adoption challenges"
],
"securityClassification": "high - gateway to critical business systems",
"performanceRequirements": "99.99% gateway availability, <100ms latency overhead, 5000 TPS capacity",
"complianceRequirements": [
"SOC2 compliance",
"Data residency requirements",
"Regulatory audit trails"
],
"strategicAlignment": "Enabler for digital ecosystem strategy, partner integration, and legacy modernization initiatives",
"applicationComponents": [
{
"applicationName": "API Developer Portal",
"applicationDescription": "Self-service platform for API discovery, documentation, and developer onboarding",
"applicationCategory": "development-tool",
"businessCapabilitiesSupported": [
"Partner Ecosystem Management",
"Digital Channel Development",
"Integration"
],
"functionalDescription": "API catalog, interactive documentation, API key management, analytics dashboard, community forums",
"interfacesProvided": [
"Developer Registration API",
"API Metrics API",
"Documentation Rendering Service"
],
"interfacesConsumed": [
"API Gateway Metrics",
"API Repository",
"Identity Service"
],
"dataEntitiesManaged": [
"API definitions",
"Developer accounts",
"Application registrations",
"Usage analytics"
],
"technologyStack": "Node.js, React, MongoDB, Docker, Kubernetes",
"deploymentModel": "Containerized microservices in private cloud",
"scalability": "Horizontally scalable to support 10,000 registered developers",
"availability": "99.9% availability with automated failover",
"developmentApproach": "Agile with CI/CD pipeline",
"lifecycleStage": "growth - expanding capabilities for external developer communities"
}
],
"technologyServices": [
{
"serviceName": "API Gateway Service",
"serviceDescription": "Core service managing API routing, security, throttling, and monitoring",
"serviceType": "integration-service",
"serviceLevel": "99.99% availability, <100ms latency, 24/7 support",
"serviceConsumers": [
"Mobile Applications",
"Web Applications",
"Partner Systems",
"Internal Microservices"
],
"serviceProviders": [
"API Gateway Clusters",
"Load Balancers"
],
"serviceProtocol": [
"HTTPS",
"WebSockets",
"gRPC"
],
"serviceInterfaces": [
"Management REST API",
"Metrics API",
"Configuration API"
],
"securityControls": "OAuth 2.0 enforcement, API key validation, JWT validation, rate limiting, IP filtering",
"serviceDependencies": [
"Identity and Access Management Service",
"Monitoring and Alerting Platform"
],
"serviceAvailability": "Active-active deployment across multiple availability zones",
"serviceScalability": "Auto-scaling based on traffic patterns up to 5000 TPS",
"serviceCost": "$85 per million API calls with volume discounts",
"serviceMonitoring": "Real-time dashboards, synthetic testing, anomaly detection, business impact alerts"
}
],
"infrastructureElements": [
{
"infrastructureName": "API Gateway Cluster",
"infrastructureType": "application-infrastructure",
"infrastructureLocation": "Multi-region cloud deployment",
"capacityMetrics": "5000 transactions per second, 2TB configuration storage",
"utilizationMetrics": "Average 45% CPU utilization, 65% peak periods",
"environmentType": "production",
"infrastructureManager": "Integration Operations Team",
"backupStrategy": "Configuration snapshots every 6 hours, geo-redundant storage",
"disasterRecoveryCapability": "Multi-region active-active with automated failover",
"technicalSpecifications": "Container-based deployment on Kubernetes, with dedicated nodes for high-performance processing",
"maintenanceSchedule": "Monthly patch window, rolling updates without downtime",
"endOfLifeDate": "Platform refresh planned for 2028",
"replacementStrategy": "Continuous evolution with major version upgrades annually",
"infrastructureCost": "Annual operational cost of $650K including cloud resources"
}
],
"standardElements": [
{
"standardName": "Enterprise API Design Standard",
"standardType": "integration",
"standardDescription": "Comprehensive guidelines for designing, documenting, and implementing APIs across the enterprise",
"standardVersion": "3.2",
"standardStatus": "current",
"complianceRequirement": "mandatory",
"enforcementMechanism": "Automated validation in CI/CD pipeline, architectural review for exceptions",
"waiverProcess": "Formal exception request to API Governance Board with business justification",
"standardUsage": "All internal and external APIs developed by the organization",
"standardBenefits": "Consistent developer experience, improved reusability, streamlined integration, reduced support costs",
"alternativeStandards": "GraphQL standard available for complex data retrieval scenarios",
"governingBody": "API Governance Board chaired by Enterprise Architecture"
}
],
"performanceIndicators": [
{
"indicatorName": "API Platform Adoption",
"description": "Percentage of enterprise integrations using the API platform",
"currentValue": "72%",
"targetValue": "95%",
"trend": "increasing"
},
{
"indicatorName": "Developer Satisfaction",
"description": "Average rating from API consumers",
"currentValue": "4.1/5.0",
"targetValue": "4.5/5.0",
"trend": "stable"
},
{
"indicatorName": "API Response Time",
"description": "Average latency added by API gateway",
"currentValue": "85ms",
"targetValue": "<50ms",
"trend": "improving"
},
{
"indicatorName": "API Reuse Rate",
"description": "Average number of consumers per API",
"currentValue": "3.8",
"targetValue": "6.0",
"trend": "increasing"
}
],
"relationshipExamples": [
{
"relationshipType": "Technology-Capability",
"relatedEntityID": "CAP-INT-001",
"relationshipDescription": "Enables System Integration capability through standardized API management",
"relationshipStrength": 5
},
{
"relationshipType": "Technology-Service",
"relatedEntityID": "SRV-PARTNER-002",
"relationshipDescription": "Delivers secure partner integration services through managed APIs",
"relationshipStrength": 4
},
{
"relationshipType": "Technology-Initiative",
"relatedEntityID": "INIT-DIGITAL-005",
"relationshipDescription": "Core enabler for Digital Ecosystem Initiative",
"relationshipStrength": 5
}
]
}
|
Attribute | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
title | Name of the technology component or service | "Customer Relationship Management System" |
description | Detailed explanation of the technology element | "Enterprise CRM solution for managing customer interactions, sales pipelines, and service requests" |
technologyType | Classification of technology (e.g., application, infrastructure) | "Application" |
orgUnitTitle | The IT or technology organization unit responsible for this component | "Enterprise Applications Team" |
orgUnitRoles | Specific roles within the technology organization that manage this component | ["Application Owner", "System Administrator", "Business Analyst"] |
technologyLayer | Position in the technology stack | "Business Application Layer" |
currentState | Status of the technology element | "Production" |
targetState | Desired future state | "Enhance with AI-driven insights by Q4 2025" |
businessOwner | Business stakeholder responsible | "VP of Customer Experience" |
technicalOwner | Technical stakeholder responsible | "Enterprise Applications Director" |
supportModel | Support and maintenance approach | "24/7 service desk with tiered escalation to vendor" |
lifecycle | Current lifecycle stage | "Growth" |
vendors | External vendors/partners involved | ["Salesforce", "Implementation Partner Inc."] |
standards | Applicable technology standards | ["OAuth 2.0", "REST API", "Data Encryption Standard"] |
costs | Financial implications of this technology | {"acquisitionCost": "$1.2M", "annualOperatingCost": "$450K"} |
risks | Technical and business risks | ["Data migration complexities", "User adoption challenges"] |
securityClassification | Security requirements and rating | "High - Contains sensitive customer data" |
performanceRequirements | Required performance characteristics | "99.9% availability, <2 second response time" |
complianceRequirements | Regulatory compliance considerations | ["GDPR", "CCPA", "Industry data protection standards"] |
strategicAlignment | How this technology supports business strategy | "Enables personalized customer experience strategy and 360° customer view" |
Sub-Element | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
applicationName | Name of the application | "Enterprise CRM Platform" |
applicationDescription | Detailed description | "Cloud-based CRM solution that manages the complete customer lifecycle" |
applicationCategory | Classification within portfolio | "Customer Management" |
businessCapabilitiesSupported | Linked business capabilities | ["Customer Relationship Management", "Sales Pipeline Management", "Service Delivery"] |
functionalDescription | Key functions provided | "Contact management, opportunity tracking, service case management, marketing campaign integration" |
interfacesProvided | Interfaces exposed to other systems | ["Customer API", "Analytics Data Feed", "Integration Webhooks"] |
interfacesConsumed | External interfaces consumed | ["Identity Management System", "Product Catalog Service", "Email Gateway"] |
dataEntitiesManaged | Key data handled by the application | ["Customer profiles", "Interactions", "Opportunities", "Service cases"] |
technologyStack | Technical foundation | "Salesforce Lightning Platform, AWS infrastructure, React frontend" |
deploymentModel | How the application is deployed | "Multi-tenant SaaS with private database instances" |
scalability | Scaling capabilities and limitations | "Automatic scaling to 10,000 concurrent users, 200TB data capacity" |
availability | Availability requirements and measures | "99.9% availability SLA, active-active disaster recovery" |
developmentApproach | Development methodology used | "Agile with quarterly release cycles" |
lifecycleStage | Current stage in application lifecycle | "Growth - expanding capabilities and user base" |
Sub-Element | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
serviceName | Name of the technology service | "Identity and Access Management Service" |
serviceDescription | Detailed description | "Centralized authentication and authorization service for enterprise applications" |
serviceType | Classification of service | "Security Service" |
serviceLevel | Performance and reliability parameters | "99.99% availability, <100ms response time, 24/7 support" |
serviceConsumers | Systems that use this service | ["CRM System", "HR System", "Customer Portal"] |
serviceProviders | Systems that deliver this service | ["Microsoft Azure AD", "On-premises AD infrastructure"] |
serviceProtocol | Technical protocols used | ["SAML 2.0", "OAuth 2.0", "OIDC"] |
serviceInterfaces | Interface specifications | ["REST API", "LDAP", "RADIUS"] |
securityControls | Security measures applied | "MFA, role-based access control, audit logging, encryption" |
serviceDependencies | Other services required | ["Directory Services", "Certificate Services"] |
serviceAvailability | Availability characteristics | "Multi-region deployment with automatic failover" |
serviceScalability | Scaling capabilities | "Supports up to 50,000 concurrent authentications" |
serviceCost | Cost structure for this service | "Per-user licensing plus infrastructure costs" |
serviceMonitoring | How service health is tracked | "Real-time monitoring dashboard with proactive alerting" |
Sub-Element | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
infrastructureName | Name of the infrastructure component | "Primary Data Center" |
infrastructureType | Type of infrastructure | "Physical data center" |
infrastructureLocation | Physical or logical location | "Atlanta, GA" |
capacityMetrics | Key capacity parameters | "5MW power, 10,000 sq ft, 500 rack capacity" |
utilizationMetrics | Current utilization levels | "Power: 65%, Space: 72%, Cooling: 60%" |
environmentType | Production, development, test, etc. | "Production" |
infrastructureManager | Responsible management entity | "Data Center Operations Team" |
backupStrategy | Data protection approach | "Daily incremental, weekly full backups with offsite replication" |
disasterRecoveryCapability | Recovery capabilities | "Hot site with 4-hour RTO, 15-minute RPO" |
technicalSpecifications | Detailed specifications | "Tier 3 data center, redundant power and cooling, 10Gbps network" |
maintenanceSchedule | Maintenance approach | "Monthly maintenance window, Sunday 2AM-6AM" |
endOfLifeDate | Expected retirement date | "2028-12-31" |
replacementStrategy | Approach to replacement | "Phased migration to cloud infrastructure beginning 2026" |
infrastructureCost | Cost structure | "Annual operating cost of $3.5M" |
Sub-Element | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
standardName | Name of the technology standard | "Enterprise API Design Standard" |
standardType | Category of standard | "Integration" |
standardDescription | Detailed description | "Guidelines and requirements for designing and implementing APIs across the enterprise" |
standardVersion | Current version | "v2.3" |
standardStatus | Status (e.g., emerging, current, deprecated) | "Current" |
complianceRequirement | Mandatory or recommended | "Mandatory for all new API development" |
enforcementMechanism | How compliance is enforced | "Architecture review board approvals, automated compliance checks" |
waiverProcess | Process for exceptions | "Formal exception request with business justification and compensating controls" |
standardUsage | Where the standard applies | "All internal and external APIs developed by the organization" |
standardBenefits | Benefits of adoption | "Improved interoperability, reduced integration costs, consistent security implementation" |
alternativeStandards | Acceptable alternatives | "GraphQL for specific high-complexity data retrieval scenarios" |
governingBody | Entity managing the standard | "Enterprise Architecture Board" |
Add to JSON Schema Convert these Cross domain JSON schema snippets to tables |
Domain Entity name | Domain entity type | Relationship Role | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
Enterprise Data Warehouse | Technology | Owning unit | Central enterprise data platform responsible for comprehensive data storage and analysis |
Business Intelligence | Capability | Providing unit | Provides data analysis and visualization capabilities to business units |
Customer Analytics | Capability | Consuming unit | Relies on data warehouse for customer segmentation and behavior analysis |
Product Development | Capability | Dependent unit | Depends on analytics insights for product feature prioritization |
Marketing Automation | Capability | Supported unit | Benefits from integrated customer data and behavioral analytics |
Domain Entity name | Domain entity type | Relationship Role | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
Master Data Management | Technology | Owning unit | Manages the single source of truth for key business data domains |
Customer Data | Information | Custodian unit | Responsible for maintaining data quality and governance of customer information |
Product Information | Information | Providing unit | Delivers structured product data to downstream systems |
Analytics Dashboards | Information | Consuming unit | Utilizes master data to create business intelligence reporting |
Regulatory Reporting | Information | Dependent unit | Relies on data quality and completeness for compliance reporting |
Domain Entity name | Domain entity type | Relationship Role | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
Cloud Infrastructure | Technology | Owning unit | Manages the cloud platform and related services |
API Gateway | Technology | Providing unit | Delivers secure API management services across the enterprise |
Customer Portal | Service | Consuming unit | Uses multiple technology services to deliver customer experience |
Authentication Service | Technology | Supporting unit | Provides identity verification supporting multiple business services |
Payment Processing | Service | Dependent unit | Depends on technology services for secure transaction handling |
Domain Entity name | Domain entity type | Relationship Role | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
Enterprise Architecture | Technology | Governing unit | Provides governance and standards for technology initiatives |
Digital Transformation | Initiative | Owning unit | Leads strategic technology modernization efforts |
Legacy Modernization | Initiative | Executing unit | Implements technology platform upgrades and migrations |
Data Center Consolidation | Initiative | Supporting unit | Delivers infrastructure optimization to support business goals |
Cloud Migration | Initiative | Dependent unit | Relies on architectural governance for successful execution |
Domain Entity name | Domain entity type | Relationship Role | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
Information Security | Technology | Owning unit | Manages technological controls and security frameworks |
Cybersecurity Risk | Risk | Mitigating unit | Implements controls to reduce exposure to cyber threats |
Data Privacy | Risk | Supporting unit | Provides technical controls to ensure data protection compliance |
System Availability | Risk | Monitoring unit | Tracks and reports on technology service levels and outages |
Technology Obsolescence | Risk | Managing unit | Oversees lifecycle management to prevent technical debt |
{
"Technology-Capability Relationship Schema": {
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
"title": "Technology-Capability Relationship Schema",
"description": "Schema for relationships between Technology domain and Capability domain",
"type": "object",
"required": ["relationshipID", "technologyID", "title", "relationshipType"],
"properties": {
"relationshipID": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Unique identifier for this relationship"
},
"technologyID": {
"type": "string",
"description": "ID of the technology element"
},
"title": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Name of the capability"
},
"relationshipType": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Nature of the relationship",
"enum": ["enables", "supports", "constrains", "implements", "enhances", "critical-for", "influences", "other"]
},
"relationshipStrength": {
"type": "integer",
"description": "Importance of this relationship (1-5)",
"minimum": 1,
"maximum": 5
},
"technologyContribution": {
"type": "string",
"description": "How technology contributes to the capability"
},
"capabilityRequirements": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Requirements the capability places on technology",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"requirementDescription": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Description of requirement"
},
"importance": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Importance level",
"enum": ["low", "medium", "high", "critical"]
},
"fulfillmentLevel": {
"type": "string",
"description": "How well requirement is met",
"enum": ["unmet", "partially-met", "mostly-met", "fully-met"]
},
"improvementNeeds": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Areas needing improvement"
}
}
}
},
"maturityAssessment": {
"type": "object",
"description": "Maturity of technology for capability needs",
"properties": {
"maturityLevel": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Current maturity assessment",
"enum": ["initial", "developing", "defined", "managed", "optimizing"]
},
"maturityGaps": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Key maturity gaps",
"items": {
"type": "string"
}
},
"targetMaturity": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Target maturity state"
},
"developmentRoadmap": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Plan for technology development"
}
}
},
"performanceMetrics": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Metrics for measuring technology effectiveness for capability",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"metricName": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Name of metric"
},
"metricDescription": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Description of what is measured"
},
"currentValue": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Current performance"
},
"targetValue": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Target performance"
},
"impactOnCapability": {
"type": "string",
"description": "How this metric affects capability"
}
}
}
},
"lifecycleAlignment": {
"type": "object",
"description": "Alignment of technology and capability lifecycles",
"properties": {
"technologyLifecycleStage": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Current stage of technology",
"enum": ["planning", "implementation", "operational", "maintenance", "decommissioning"]
},
"capabilityLifecycleStage": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Current stage of capability",
"enum": ["emerging", "developing", "mature", "declining", "transforming"]
},
"alignmentIssues": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Issues with lifecycle alignment",
"items": {
"type": "string"
}
},
"synchronizationPlans": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Plans to align lifecycles"
}
}
}
}
}, |
"Technology-Information Relationship Schema": {
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
"title": "Technology-Information Relationship Schema",
"description": "Schema for relationships between Technology domain and Information domain",
"type": "object",
"required": ["relationshipID", "technologyID", "informationID", "relationshipType"],
"properties": {
"relationshipID": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Unique identifier for this relationship"
},
"technologyID": {
"type": "string",
"description": "ID of the technology element"
},
"informationID": {
"type": "string",
"description": "ID of the information element"
},
"relationshipType": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Nature of the relationship",
"enum": ["stores", "processes", "transmits", "secures", "transforms", "analyzes", "visualizes", "other"]
},
"relationshipStrength": {
"type": "integer",
"description": "Importance of this relationship (1-5)",
"minimum": 1,
"maximum": 5
},
"dataHandlingDescription": {
"type": "string",
"description": "How technology handles this information"
},
"dataVolume": {
"type": "object",
"description": "Volume of information handled",
"properties": {
"averageVolume": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Typical volume processed"
},
"peakVolume": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Maximum volume handled"
},
"growthRate": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Rate of volume growth"
}
}
},
"dataQualityImpact": {
"type": "object",
"description": "Technology impact on data quality",
"properties": {
"qualityRole": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Role in data quality",
"enum": ["creates", "validates", "improves", "degrades", "monitors"]
},
"qualityControls": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Controls for data quality",
"items": {
"type": "string"
}
},
"qualityIssues": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Known data quality issues",
"items": {
"type": "string"
}
}
}
},
"securityControls": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Security controls for this information",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"controlName": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Name of security control"
},
"controlDescription": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Description of control"
},
"controlEffectiveness": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Assessment of effectiveness",
"enum": ["ineffective", "partially-effective", "effective", "highly-effective"]
}
}
}
},
"performanceMetrics": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Metrics for information handling performance",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"metricName": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Name of metric"
},
"metricDescription": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Description of what is measured"
},
"currentValue": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Current performance"
},
"targetValue": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Target performance"
}
}
}
},
"complianceRequirements": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Compliance requirements for information handling",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"requirementName": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Name of requirement"
},
"requirementDescription": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Description of requirement"
},
"complianceStatus": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Status of compliance",
"enum": ["non-compliant", "partially-compliant", "compliant", "exceeds-requirements"]
}
}
}
}
}
}, |
"Technology-Service Relationship Schema": {
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
"title": "Technology-Service Relationship Schema",
"description": "Schema for relationships between Technology domain and Service domain",
"type": "object",
"required": ["relationshipID", "technologyID", "serviceID", "relationshipType"],
"properties": {
"relationshipID": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Unique identifier for this relationship"
},
"technologyID": {
"type": "string",
"description": "ID of the technology element"
},
"serviceID": {
"type": "string",
"description": "ID of the service element"
},
"relationshipType": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Nature of the relationship",
"enum": ["enables", "delivers", "supports", "monitors", "constrains", "optimizes", "secures", "other"]
},
"relationshipStrength": {
"type": "integer",
"description": "Importance of this relationship (1-5)",
"minimum": 1,
"maximum": 5
},
"serviceDeliveryRole": {
"type": "string",
"description": "How technology contributes to service delivery"
},
"serviceQualityImpact": {
"type": "object",
"description": "Impact on service quality",
"properties": {
"reliabilityImpact": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Impact on service reliability",
"enum": ["negative", "neutral", "positive", "significant-positive"]
},
"performanceImpact": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Impact on service performance",
"enum": ["negative", "neutral", "positive", "significant-positive"]
},
"userExperienceImpact": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Impact on service user experience",
"enum": ["negative", "neutral", "positive", "significant-positive"]
}
}
},
"serviceLevelRequirements": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Service level requirements supported by technology",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"requirementName": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Name of service level requirement"
},
"requirementDescription": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Description of requirement"
},
"currentPerformance": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Current performance against requirement"
},
"targetPerformance": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Target performance level"
}
}
}
},
"technologyComponents": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Technology components involved in service delivery",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"componentName": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Name of technology component"
},
"componentRole": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Role in service delivery"
},
"criticalityLevel": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Importance to service",
"enum": ["low", "medium", "high", "critical"]
}
}
}
},
"serviceFailureImpact": {
"type": "object",
"description": "Technology failure impact on service",
"properties": {
"failureScenarios": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Potential failure scenarios",
"items": {
"type": "string"
}
},
"businessImpact": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Business impact of failure"
},
"recoveryCapability": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Ability to recover from failure",
"enum": ["poor", "adequate", "good", "excellent"]
},
"mitigationApproach": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Approach to mitigate failure impact"
}
}
}
}
}, |
"Technology-Initiative Relationship Schema": {
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
"title": "Technology-Initiative Relationship Schema",
"description": "Schema for relationships between Technology domain and Initiative domain",
"type": "object",
"required": ["relationshipID", "technologyID", "initiativeID", "relationshipType"],
"properties": {
"relationshipID": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Unique identifier for this relationship"
},
"technologyID": {
"type": "string",
"description": "ID of the technology element"
},
"initiativeID": {
"type": "string",
"description": "ID of the initiative element"
},
"relationshipType": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Nature of the relationship",
"enum": ["target-of-change", "enabler-of-change", "constraint-on-change", "subject-to-change", "implementation-vehicle", "other"]
},
"relationshipStrength": {
"type": "integer",
"description": "Importance of this relationship (1-5)",
"minimum": 1,
"maximum": 5
},
"initiativeImpact": {
"type": "object",
"description": "How initiative impacts technology",
"properties": {
"impactType": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Type of impact on technology",
"enum": ["creation", "enhancement", "replacement", "retirement", "consolidation", "other"]
},
"impactDescription": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Description of the impact"
},
"currentState": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Current state of technology"
},
"targetState": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Target state after initiative"
}
}
},
"implementationRequirements": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Requirements for implementation",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"requirementType": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Type of requirement",
"enum": ["skills", "resources", "dependencies", "timing", "other"]
},
"requirementDescription": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Description of requirement"
},
"criticality": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Importance of requirement",
"enum": ["low", "medium", "high", "critical"]
}
}
}
},
"riskAssessment": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Technology-related risks for initiative",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"riskDescription": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Description of the risk"
},
"likelihood": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Probability of occurrence",
"enum": ["low", "medium", "high", "very-high"]
},
"impact": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Potential impact if risk occurs",
"enum": ["low", "medium", "high", "severe"]
},
"mitigationStrategy": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Approach to mitigate risk"
}
}
}
},
"successCriteria": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Technology-specific success criteria for initiative",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"criterionName": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Name of success criterion"
},
"criterionDescription": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Description of criterion"
},
"measurementApproach": {
"type": "string",
"description": "How criterion will be measured"
},
"targetValue": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Target value for success"
}
}
}
},
"timelineConsiderations": {
"type": "object",
"description": "Timeline factors for technology implementation",
"properties": {
"estimatedDuration": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Estimated implementation timeframe"
},
"keyMilestones": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Important implementation milestones",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"milestoneName": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Name of milestone"
},
"estimatedDate": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Expected completion date"
},
"dependencies": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Dependencies for this milestone",
"items": {
"type": "string"
}
}
}
}
},
"criticalPath": {
"type": "boolean",
"description": "Whether technology is on critical path"
}
}
}
}
}, |
"Technology-Risk Relationship Schema": {
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
"title": "Technology-Risk Relationship Schema",
"description": "Schema for relationships between Technology domain and Risk Management domain",
"type": "object",
"required": ["relationshipID", "technologyID", "riskID", "relationshipType"],
"properties": {
"relationshipID": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Unique identifier for this relationship"
},
"technologyID": {
"type": "string",
"description": "ID of the technology element"
},
"riskID": {
"type": "string",
"description": "ID of the risk element"
},
"relationshipType": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Nature of the relationship",
"enum": ["creates-risk", "mitigates-risk", "affected-by-risk", "monitors-risk", "controls-risk", "transfers-risk", "other"]
},
"relationshipStrength": {
"type": "integer",
"description": "Importance of this relationship (1-5)",
"minimum": 1,
"maximum": 5
},
"riskProfile": {
"type": "object",
"description": "Risk characteristics related to technology",
"properties": {
"riskCategory": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Category of risk",
"enum": ["security", "availability", "performance", "compliance", "obsolescence", "vendor", "other"]
},
"probability": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Likelihood of risk occurrence",
"enum": ["low", "medium", "high", "very-high"]
},
"impact": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Potential impact if risk materializes",
"enum": ["low", "medium", "high", "severe"]
},
"riskRating": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Overall risk rating",
"enum": ["low", "medium", "high", "critical"]
}
}
},
"vulnerabilities": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Technology vulnerabilities contributing to risk",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"vulnerabilityName": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Name of vulnerability"
},
"vulnerabilityDescription": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Description of vulnerability"
},
"severity": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Severity level",
"enum": ["low", "medium", "high", "critical"]
},
"remediationStatus": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Status of remediation",
"enum": ["not-addressed", "planned", "in-progress", "resolved"]
}
}
}
},
"controlMechanisms": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Technology controls for this risk",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"controlName": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Name of control"
},
"controlDescription": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Description of control"
},
"controlType": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Type of control",
"enum": ["preventive", "detective", "corrective", "compensating"]
},
"implementationStatus": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Status of implementation",
"enum": ["not-implemented", "partially-implemented", "implemented", "verified"]
},
"effectiveness": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Control effectiveness",
"enum": ["ineffective", "partially-effective", "effective", "highly-effective"]
}
}
}
},
"monitoringApproach": {
"type": "object",
"description": "How technology-related risks are monitored",
"properties": {
"monitoringMethods": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Methods used for monitoring",
"items": {
"type": "string"
}
},
"keyIndicators": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Key risk indicators",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"indicatorName": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Name of indicator"
},
"thresholds": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Thresholds for alert"
},
"currentStatus": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Current indicator status"
}
}
}
},
"alertMechanisms": {
"type": "string",
"description": "How alerts are triggered and managed"
},
"reviewFrequency": {
"type": "string",
"description": "How often risk is reviewed",
"enum": ["continuous", "daily", "weekly", "monthly", "quarterly", "annually"]
}
}
},
"incidentHistory": {
"type": "array",
"description": "History of risk incidents with this technology",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"incidentDate": {
"type": "string",
"format": "date",
"description": "Date of incident"
},
"incidentDescription": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Description of what occurred"
},
"impact": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Impact of the incident"
},
"resolution": {
"type": "string",
"description": "How incident was resolved"
},
"lessonsLearned": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Insights gained from incident"
}
}
}
}
}
}
} |
This domain would include specific mappings to TOGAF concepts:
Alignment with TOGAF's Technology Architecture component
Support for TOGAF's Architecture Development Method (ADM)
Compatibility with TOGAF's content metamodel
Support for TOGAF's building blocks approach
The Technology Domain schema is expected to evolve with emerging practices in technology management. Future extensions may include:
Cloud architecture frameworks
DevOps and continuous delivery models
Artificial intelligence and machine learning capabilities
Edge computing and distributed architectures
API and integration platforms
Cybersecurity frameworks and zero trust models
Organizations should plan for these evolutions by maintaining clean taxonomies and clear relationship models in their current implementation.