Overview

Cross domain relationships in Orthogramic provide the connective tissue between business architecture domains. They define how different types of architectural elements influence, depend on, or support each other, allowing for meaningful insights, traceability, and alignment across the organisation.

These relationships are surfaced throughout the platform and are used for:

The relationships are derived directly from the Orthogramic Metamodel and support automatic inference of organisational structure, responsibility, and impact.

Relationship types

Each cross domain relationship is defined by:

Examples:

These are maintained within the metamodel and visualised within Orthogramic Insights to support exploration and navigation.

Relationship type list

Icon

Relationship Type

Description

Funds node.png

funds

Finance provides financial resources to another domain entity to enable its development, operation, or enhancement.

Quantifies node.png

quantifies

Finance expresses the activities, outputs, or outcomes of another domain entity in measurable financial terms.

Reports on node.png

reports_on

Finance produces formal reports capturing the financial performance, costs, or returns associated with another domain entity.

Forecasts node.png

forecasts

Finance projects future financial needs, costs, or revenues associated with another domain entity.

Supporting node.png

supported

One domain entity receives necessary resources, services, or capabilities from another domain entity to deliver its intended outputs or outcomes.

Constrains node.png

constrains

One domain entity imposes limitations, standards, or compliance requirements on another domain entity’s design, operation, or evolution.

Enables node.png

enables

One domain entity is essential for the successful implementation, operationalisation, or fulfilment of another domain entity.

701c21de-e77c-4913-bcf5-3c54ad4063a2.png

mitigates

One domain entity actively reduces the risks or vulnerabilities associated with another domain entity.

Monitors node.png

monitors

One domain entity oversees, measures, or evaluates the performance or effectiveness of another domain entity.

Governing node.png

governing

One domain entity defines policies, standards, or decision rights that control the operation of another domain entity.

Drives demand for node.png

drives_demand

One domain entity generates, influences, or amplifies the demand for another domain entity’s outputs, services, or capabilities.

Responds to node.png

responds_to

One domain entity is triggered, adapted, or activated in response to changes in another domain entity or external event.

Consuming node.png

consuming

One domain entity uses, relies upon, or draws from the resources, outputs, or services of another domain entity.

Aligns_with node.png

aligns_with

One domain entity is intentionally coordinated or harmonised with another domain entity in purpose, direction, or design without establishing a direct dependency.

Oversee node.png

oversee

For systematic traceability of oversight responsibilities.

Accountable to node.png

accountable_to

For a clear line of responsibility between entities

Use in document analysis

When documents are parsed, relationships between domains are inferred based on sentence structure, contextual clues, and declared associations (e.g. “This initiative improves customer engagement by enhancing CRM capabilities”).

These inferred relationships are validated and used to:

Use in mindmaps

Cross domain relationships are rendered in mindmaps to:

Difference from inter-domain relationships

Cross domain relationships describe the conceptual and operational connections between different types of elements across domains (e.g. a Strategy influencing a Capability). They are structural to the metamodel and are not confined to any particular organisational unit.

By contrast, inter-domain relationships focus on how these cross-domain connections manifest across different organisational units—for instance, how a Capability in one unit depends on a Service or Initiative governed by another. Inter-unit domain relationships are thus a subset of cross domain relationships, contextualised to show organisational span, dependency, and potential silos.

Related pages