Inter-unit domain relationships describe how business architecture elements—such as capabilities, services, policies, or performance indicators—are shared, co-managed, or interdependent across different organisational units. These relationships provide a more accurate picture of how the organisation functions in practice, especially where responsibilities cross formal boundaries.
Establishing inter-unit relationships helps your organisation to:
Clarify shared ownership, dependencies, or oversight across business units.
Support cross-functional planning, delivery, and performance tracking.
Reveal how outcomes are achieved through coordinated effort across teams.
Enable more holistic reporting, especially for enterprise-wide strategies and capabilities.
In most cases, the Orthogramic app will automatically identify inter-unit relationships by analysing the content of uploaded documents. If domain elements such as services, policies, or initiatives are described in the context of multiple organisational units, relationships are inferred and created accordingly.
These automated relationships:
Are based on document evidence and context.
Are visible in dashboards and views across domain and unit perspectives.
Can be reviewed, confirmed, or adjusted by authorised users.
In addition to automatic detection, users can manually define inter-unit relationships to reflect practical arrangements or planning considerations not yet captured in documents.
To manually define a relationship:
Open the relevant domain element (e.g. a specific service, stakeholder, or KPI).
Select Link to another unit.
Choose the unit and specify the nature of the relationship (e.g. lead, support, oversight).
Save the entry to register the relationship.
Manual relationships can be particularly useful when:
Formal responsibilities are still being documented.
Temporary or informal collaborations exist.
You are preparing for structural changes or new initiatives.
Focus on relationships that are active or strategically important.
Review regularly to ensure accuracy and relevance.
Use clear relationship types to convey the nature of interdependence.
Use dashboards and filters to monitor the impact of shared responsibilities.
A digital service delivered by the IT unit but requiring operational input from customer service.
A sustainability initiative coordinated by strategy but implemented by property, fleet, and procurement teams.
A compliance KPI tracked by risk and finance teams jointly.
A policy framework authored by legal but enacted across frontline divisions.
Click a node
In the Node menu (See below), select > Relationships
Select > Inter-unit domain relationships
The Inter-unit domain relationships will be displayed as shown below.
When the inter-unit relationships are displayed:
Click a relationship
Click the other entity you are in interested in
The info panel will open and display a card with the relationship information
Node | Role type | Definition |
---|---|---|
![]() |
| The unit accountable for the governance, lifecycle, and quality of the domain entity (e.g. capability, information asset, or policy). |
![]() |
| The unit that delivers the core functionality, service, or resource associated with the domain entity. |
![]() |
| The unit that actively uses the outputs or results of the domain entity to perform its own operations. |
![]() |
| A broader term than consuming, denoting any unit that benefits from the domain entity, even if indirectly (e.g. benefits from insight, capability). |
![]() |
| The unit responsible for maintaining integrity, accuracy, and compliance of an information or data entity. |
![]() |
| The unit whose ability to achieve its objectives relies on the effective functioning of another unit’s domain entity. |
![]() |
| The unit that gains operational advantage or risk reduction as a result of another unit’s domain activity, but is not actively consuming it. |
![]() |
| The unit responsible for setting rules, standards, or oversight mechanisms for the domain entity and ensuring compliance across all related units. |
To enhance the usefulness of inter-unit domain relationships in organisational analysis, a numeric relationship strength value may be added. This value provides a relative indication of the intensity, criticality, or frequency of interaction between an organisational unit and the domain entity.
Relationship strength is visually represented by the width of the connection between the nodes.
In the image above, the first relationship has a strength of 5 and the second a strength of 1.
Difference from cross domain relationshipsInter-unit domain relationships focus on how business architecture elements interact across organisational boundaries—for example, when a Capability owned by one business unit relies on a Service or Initiative delivered by another. These relationships expose cross-unit dependencies, collaboration points, and potential silos within the organisation. In contrast, cross domain relationships describe the conceptual structure of the business architecture—how elements such as Strategies, Capabilities, Value Streams, and Policies relate regardless of organisational ownership. They are foundational to the Orthogramic Metamodel and define the logical flow and influence between domains. While cross domain relationships define what should be connected, inter-unit relationships reveal where those connections span business units—and whether they are aligned in practice. |