Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Table of Contents
stylenone

...

The Strategic Response Model defines the following categories of drivers:

Driver Type

Description

Common Triggers

Example Rationales

Related Domains

Regulatory change

Changes in legal or regulatory requirements

New legislation, audits

Align with safety standards; address compliance risks

Policy, Initiatives, Capabilities, Performance

Customer demand shift

Shifting customer expectations or behaviours

Feedback, usage patterns

Improve onboarding; redesign mobile services

Strategy, ValueStream, Capabilities, Stakeholders

Operational risk

Threats to continuity or operational efficiency

System failure, safety incidents

Enhance cyber resilience; strengthen recovery plans

Capabilities, Performance, Information, Organisation

Technology obsolescence

Legacy or unsupported systems impacting operations

End-of-life systems, innovation lag

Modernise tech stack; enable data interoperability

Information, Capabilities, Initiatives

Cost pressure

Financial constraints requiring efficiency or cost optimisation

Budget cuts, benchmarking

Consolidate platforms; automate manual processes

Performance, Capabilities, Initiatives, Organisation

Workforce change

Evolving workforce dynamics

Hybrid work, attrition

Reskill staff; adapt HR policies

Organisation, Policy, Capabilities

Stakeholder expectation

Pressure or concern from internal or external stakeholders

Board expectations, ESG concerns

Increase transparency; implement ethical compliance

Stakeholders, Policy, Performance

Market opportunity

New market trends or emerging business opportunities

Competitor gap, new segment demand

Launch services; localise products

Strategy, ValueStream, Capabilities, Initiatives

...

Example: rationale linked to a trigger

This example illustrates a compliance-driven rationale responding to a legislative trigger. The rationale is linked to strategic, capability, and policy domains—indicating both what must change and where within the enterprise architecture that change is applied.

{
"rationaleTitle": "Adapt operations to AI regulatory update",
"description": "In response to new cross-sector legislation regulating high-risk AI systems, this rationale supports the immediate review and adjustment of internal AI-powered analytics capabilities.",
"trigger": {
"triggerID": "TRIG-2025-0917",
"title": "AI Regulation Act Passed",
"description": "The national AI Regulation Act imposes new compliance standards on predictive algorithms used in public-facing services.",
"triggerType": "Regulatory",
"dateDetected": "2025-04-01"
},
"classification": "Compliance",
"linkedDomains": [
"Strategy",
"Capabilities",
"Policy"
],
"dateCreated": "2025-04-17",
"author": "Strategic Governance Office",
"orgUnitTitle": "AI Risk & Compliance Team"
}This example illustrates a compliance-driven rationale responding to a legislative trigger. The rationale is linked to strategic, capability, and policy domains—indicating both what must change and where within the enterprise architecture that change is applied.

Rationale JSON schema

{
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
"title": "Rationale Schema",
"description": "Schema for a Rationale object used in the Strategic Response Model to explain the reasoning behind strategic responses",
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"rationaleTitle": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Title or summary of the rationale"
},
"description": {
"type": "string",
"description": "A detailed explanation of the rationale supporting a strategic response"
},
"trigger": {
"$ref": "https://orthogramic.com/schemas/trigger.schema.json ",
"description": "Trigger object that prompted this rationale, defined according to the Trigger schema"
},
"linkedDomains": {
"type": "array",
"description": "List of business architecture domains influenced or justified by this rationale",
"items": {
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"Strategy",
"Capabilities",
"Initiatives",
"Policy",
"Information",
"Performance",
"Products",
"Services",
"Stakeholder",
"Value Stream"
]
}
},
"classification": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Optional category for the rationale (e.g. risk mitigation, compliance, opportunity, mandate)",
"enum": [
"Risk",
"Compliance",
"Opportunity",
"Mandate",
"Performance Insight",
"Stakeholder Need",
"Other"
]
},
"dateCreated": {
"type": "string",
"format": "date",
"description": "The date the rationale was first recorded"
},
"author": {
"type": "string",
"description": "The person or team who documented the rationale"
},
"orgUnitTitle": {
"type": "string",
"description": "The organisational unit that owns or authored the rationale"
}
},
"required": [
"rationaleTitle",
"description",
"trigger"
]
}