Introduction
A Rationale provides the logical reasoning behind a strategic or operational response. It is triggered by a specific condition (Trigger), and it guides the alignment of actions across one or more business architecture domains. Rationales are formalised objects in the Strategic Response Model and are central to decision transparency and traceability. See: https://orthogramic.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/OM/pages/286228485
Rationales help ensure that every action taken by the organisation is grounded in strategic intent.
Every Rationale must reference the Trigger that prompted it. This is represented either by linking to a triggerID
or embedding the full Trigger object (via schema reference). This linkage ensures traceability from external condition through to internal response.
Rationales may arise from performance insights, stakeholder needs, risk exposures, compliance obligations, or strategic opportunities.
Usage in business architecture
In the Orthogramic Metamodel, rationales serve to:
Justify why an initiative, policy, or change exists.
Link strategic drivers to responses in a structured way.
Support transparency and traceability from high-level drivers to operational change.
Rationales may be connected to multiple elements across the business architecture, including:
Initiatives and Strategies that require justification.
Policies, Capabilities, and Value Streams being introduced or adjusted.
Performance goals or KPIs in the Performance domain.
Relationship to strategic response model
Each rationale is categorised by a Driver Type, which is derived from the Strategic Response Model. This provides a consistent basis for understanding and classifying business responses across the organisation.
Strategic Response Model drivers
The Strategic Response Model defines the following categories of drivers:
Driver Type | Description | Common Triggers | Example Rationales | Related Domains |
---|---|---|---|---|
Regulatory change | Changes in legal or regulatory requirements | New legislation, audits | Align with safety standards; address compliance risks | Policy, Initiatives, Capabilities, Performance |
Customer demand shift | Shifting customer expectations or behaviours | Feedback, usage patterns | Improve onboarding; redesign mobile services | Strategy, ValueStream, Capabilities, Stakeholders |
Operational risk | Threats to continuity or operational efficiency | System failure, safety incidents | Enhance cyber resilience; strengthen recovery plans | Capabilities, Performance, Information, Organisation |
Technology obsolescence | Legacy or unsupported systems impacting operations | End-of-life systems, innovation lag | Modernise tech stack; enable data interoperability | Information, Capabilities, Initiatives |
Cost pressure | Financial constraints requiring efficiency or cost optimisation | Budget cuts, benchmarking | Consolidate platforms; automate manual processes | Performance, Capabilities, Initiatives, Organisation |
Workforce change | Evolving workforce dynamics | Hybrid work, attrition | Reskill staff; adapt HR policies | Organisation, Policy, Capabilities |
Stakeholder expectation | Pressure or concern from internal or external stakeholders | Board expectations, ESG concerns | Increase transparency; implement ethical compliance | Stakeholders, Policy, Performance |
Market opportunity | New market trends or emerging business opportunities | Competitor gap, new segment demand | Launch services; localise products | Strategy, ValueStream, Capabilities, Initiatives |
Implementation guidance
Classification: Each rationale must include a driver type. Multiple drivers may be selected if appropriate.
Traceability: Rationales should link to the relevant strategy, initiative, or performance goal.
Consistency: Use the https://orthogramic.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/OM/pages/290914315#Trigger-Catalogue to guide classification.
Relationship to Triggers
Every rationale originates in response to a defined Trigger—an external event, internal insight, or strategic condition that prompts consideration or action. The Rationale captures the logical reasoning for why a specific response is necessary, based on that triggering context. This link is formalised via the trigger
field, which connects each rationale directly to its source condition using the
For further details on how triggers are defined, classified, and managed, see: https://orthogramic.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/OM/pages/290914315 and the associated https://orthogramic.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/OM/pages/290914315#Trigger-Catalogue, which outlines recognised types such as Regulatory, Risk, Opportunity, and Performance Insight.
How rationales are formed in response to specific triggers
Rationales are formed by analysing the implications of a specific trigger—whether external (e.g. regulatory change, market shift) or internal (e.g. performance trend, operational failure)—and articulating the reasoning behind a proposed strategic response. Each rationale provides the logical and contextual justification for why a response is appropriate, necessary, or valuable. This step bridges the gap between situational awareness (the trigger) and deliberate action (the response), ensuring decisions are traceable, defensible, and aligned with organisational goals.
By linking a rationale to its originating trigger, organisations can ensure transparency in decision-making, assess the consistency of responses over time, and identify patterns that inform future strategic planning. Rationales also provide auditability for governance, especially when responses involve major investments or policy changes.
Linked domains and rationale classification
A rationale may influence multiple business architecture domains. These are listed under the linkedDomains
property and allow downstream actions to be traced back to justifying logic. The classification
field allows rationales to be categorised according to:
Risk
Compliance
Opportunity
Mandate
Performance Insight
Stakeholder Need
Other
Rationale JSON schema
See: https://github.com/Orthogramic/Orthogramic_Metamodel
Schema properties
Field | Description | Example |
---|---|---|
| A unique identifier for the rationale |
|
| A short title describing the purpose or intent of the rationale |
|
| Classification of the rationale (e.g., Compliance, Risk Reduction, Innovation) |
|
| A detailed explanation of why the organisation is taking action |
|
| List of associated trigger IDs that support or initiate this rationale |
|
| The business architecture domain influenced or justified by the rationale |
|
| The identifier of the entity (e.g., strategy, initiative) that is justified |
|
| The organisation unit responsible for acting on the rationale |
|
| Summary of the expected impact or outcome of acting on the rationale |
|
This schema supports structured reasoning and traceability across strategy, policy, and initiative development, ensuring that every response is grounded in a documented justification.