Strategic response model
Introduction
The Strategic Response Model (SRM) allows organisations to capture and understand how internal or external triggers lead to deliberate, structured responses across the business. It provides traceability between cause and effect—connecting performance insights, regulatory changes, stakeholder demands, and other drivers with the actions taken to realign business architecture domains.
This model supports continuous strategic alignment by documenting why a change occurred, how it was rationalised, and what was impacted—across strategies, capabilities, initiatives, policy, and organisational units.
Purpose
The SRM strengthens strategic governance by ensuring that:
Business responses are traceable to defined triggers
Rationales are explicitly captured and consistently structured
Impact across domains and organisational units is recorded
Organisational learning and auditability are enhanced
Structure
Each Strategic Response includes:
A trigger: drawn from the shared trigger catalogue
A rationale object: structured and detailed, replacing simple references
One or more affected domains: such as policy, initiatives, or capabilities
Impacted organisational units: using defined role types
Response actions: steps taken or planned
Expected outcomes: anticipated benefits or changes in performance
Rationale object
Each response includes a rationale
object that captures the justification for action. It replaces previous references to rationaleId
and allows richer traceability and reasoning.
Field | Description |
---|---|
| A short name for the rationale |
| A detailed explanation of the reasoning behind the response |
| Categorises the driver (e.g. Regulatory, Risk, Market, Insight) |
| Reference to the originating insight, regulation, or analysis |
| KPIs that the response is intended to influence or improve |
| (Optional) Indicates urgency or importance (e.g. High, Medium, Low) |
Trigger catalogue
Responses reference a trigger selected from a standardised catalogue of events, trends, or insights. This ensures consistency in classifying causes of change and enables systemic analysis across responses.
See: Trigger catalogue
Affected domains
Strategic responses typically impact one or more of the following domains:
Strategy: adjustments to goals or strategic direction
Capabilities: development, enhancement, or decommissioning
Initiatives: programs or projects started or stopped
Policy: introduction or amendment of rules and frameworks
Performance: redefinition or reweighting of KPIs
Information: changes to how data is used or governed
Value Stream: refinements in end-to-end value delivery
Impacted organisational units
The impactedUnits
array uses standardised relationship roles (as defined in the Inter-unit Domain Relationships model). These include:
Owning: responsible for executing or delivering the response
Providing: delivers resources or services into the response
Utilising: benefits directly from the response outcome
Consuming: depends on updated processes or data
Dependent: cannot proceed without the change
Custodian: maintains the associated processes or information
Governed by: subject to new or modified policies
Supported by: indirectly enhanced by the outcome without direct contribution
Each unit listed includes a description of how it is impacted, ensuring traceability to structure and accountability.
Example
Trigger: Regulation 10.15/F—Mandatory Near Miss Reporting
Rationale:
{ "rationaleTitle": "Compliance with Regulation 10.15/F", "description": "Federal regulation mandates improved near-miss reporting. The goal is to enable predictive analytics to reduce preventable incidents.", "driverType": "Regulatory", "sourceDocument": "FRA Bulletin 2025/04", "relatedKPIs": ["Near Miss Capture Rate", "Incident Prevention Rate"], "priorityLevel": "High" }
Affected domains: Policy, Capabilities, Performance
Impacted units:
Track Safety Division – Owning
Risk & Compliance – Custodian
Regional Safety Teams – Supported by
Response actions:
Define new reporting protocols
Train field inspectors
Deploy incident management tool enhancements
Expected outcome:
80% near-miss reporting coverage within 12 months
Reduction in preventable incidents by 20% by end of 2026What is a Trigger?
Example: Strategic Response Model Artefact
This section presents a detailed example of a strategic response model, illustrating how a specific trigger—such as the mandated use of AI in compliance reporting—activates relevant strategies, units, capabilities, and initiatives. It demonstrates the practical application of the artefact in real-world organisational strategic responses.
Strategic response model trigger: Mandatory introduction of AI-enabled safety compliance reporting
Strategic drivers:
Reduce regulatory breach risk
Improve transparency in safety inspections
Key units:
Safety Technology Division (owning unit of AI capability)
Operations (utilising unit for inspection automation)
Legal & Risk (dependent on compliance datasets)
Capabilities:
AI-driven compliance reporting (owned by Safety Tech)
Digital field inspection (provided by Operations)
Safety data analytics (supported by Risk & Legal)
Services:
Compliance assurance service
Safety incident triage
Value streams:
Rail infrastructure incident response
Annual compliance certification
Information:
Real-time safety telemetry
Historical incident database
Stakeholders:
Federal Transport Regulator
Union of Track Workers
Policies:
Data transparency policy
AI auditing standards
Performance KPIs:
% of safety incidents auto-classified
Mean response time to compliance events
Initiatives:
AI for Safety Program (current)
Transparent Audit Framework (proposed)
Relationship with Rationales
Rationales play an important role in classifying and organising strategic responses. Ensure that the trigger catalogue—which lists common environmental or operational triggers prompting strategic responses—is up to date. Reference to the trigger catalogue within this page ensures that rationales are accurately categorised based on their initiating context, improving traceability from external or internal stimuli through to strategic objectives, initiatives, and performance metrics.
DriverType values for rationales
SRM trigger catalogue as an enumeration list of driverType
values for rationales. For example:
"driverType": {
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"Regulatory change",
"Customer demand shift",
"Operational risk",
"Technology obsolescence",
"Performance shortfall",
"Cost pressure",
"Workforce change",
"Stakeholder expectation",
"Market opportunity"
],
"description": "High-level driver category that provides the basis for the rationale."
}
Definition of strategicResponseModel
as a composable artefact
This section formalises the strategic response model as composable within the Orthogramic Metamodel. It outlines the attributes required to define a model, including associated triggers, organisational roles, information dependencies, and KPIs, supporting reuse and integration across governance and planning tools.
Attribute | Type | Description |
---|---|---|
| UUID | Unique strategic response model ID |
| Text | Human-readable name of the strategic response model |
| Text | Summary of the strategic response model’s purpose and scope |
| Link to | Source event or condition |
| List of | Strategy elements influenced |
| List of | Impacted capabilities |
| List of | Value streams engaged |
| List of | Units with strategic response model-specific roles |
| List of | Services required or affected |
| List of | Key information entities involved |
| List of | Applicable rules or regulations |
| List of | Stakeholders affected or involved |
| List of | Metrics used to assess strategic response model success |
| List of | Programs or projects implementing the response |
This format ensures that the strategic response definition is:
Declarative (not procedural or UI-specific),
Traceable (everything points to reusable metamodel entities),
Reusable (across tools, audits, planning activities).
Strategic Response Model JSON Schema
{
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
"title": "Strategic Response Model Schema",
"description": "Schema for representing strategic responses to triggers that affect business architecture domains.",
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"responseTitle": {
"type": "string",
"description": "The name or title of the Strategic Response"
},
"description": {
"type": "string",
"description": "A detailed explanation of the Strategic Response and its intent"
},
"triggerId": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Reference ID linking to the triggering event or driver"
},
"triggerType": {
"type": "string",
"description": "The category of trigger",
"enum": ["Regulatory", "Market", "Risk", "Performance Insight", "Stakeholder Demand", "Technology Shift", "Other"]
},
"rationale": {
"type": "object",
"description": "Structured rationale that justifies the Strategic Response",
"properties": {
"rationaleTitle": {
"type": "string",
"description": "A short name for the rationale"
},
"description": {
"type": "string",
"description": "A detailed explanation of the reasoning behind the response"
},
"driverType": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Category of driver for the rationale",
"enum": ["Regulatory", "Risk", "Market", "Insight", "Stakeholder", "Technology", "Compliance", "Other"]
},
"sourceDocument": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Document or source that prompted this rationale"
},
"relatedKPIs": {
"type": "array",
"description": "List of KPIs that this response intends to influence",
"items": {
"type": "string"
}
},
"priorityLevel": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Urgency or criticality of the rationale",
"enum": ["High", "Medium", "Low"]
}
},
"required": ["rationaleTitle", "description", "driverType"]
},
"affectedDomains": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Business architecture domains impacted by the response",
"items": {
"type": "string",
"enum": ["Strategy", "Capabilities", "Initiatives", "Policy", "Performance", "Services", "Information", "Value Stream"]
}
},
"impactedUnits": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Organisation units impacted by the response",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"orgUnitTitle": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Name of the impacted organisation unit"
},
"relationshipRole": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Role played by the unit in relation to this response",
"enum": [
"Owning",
"Providing",
"Utilising",
"Consuming",
"Dependent",
"Custodian",
"Governed by",
"Supported by"
]
},
"impactDescription": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Narrative of how the unit is affected"
}
},
"required": ["orgUnitTitle", "relationshipRole"]
}
},
"responseActions": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Actions taken or planned as part of the Strategic Response",
"items": {
"type": "string"
}
},
"expectedOutcomes": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Expected benefits or changes resulting from this response"
},
"performanceImplications": {
"type": "string",
"description": "How the response affects KPIs or performance tracking"
}
},
"required": ["responseTitle", "description", "triggerId", "triggerType", "rationale", "affectedDomains"]
}