Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this content. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Version History

« Previous Version 21 Next »

Introduction

A Rationale provides the logical reasoning behind a strategic or operational response. It is triggered by a specific condition (Trigger), and it guides the alignment of actions across one or more business architecture domains. Rationales are formalised objects in the Strategic Response Model and are central to decision transparency and traceability. See: Strategic Response Model

Rationales help ensure that every action taken by the organisation is grounded in strategic intent.

Usage in business architecture

In the Orthogramic Metamodel, rationales serve to:

  • Justify why an initiative, policy, or change exists.

  • Link strategic drivers to responses in a structured way.

  • Support transparency and traceability from high-level drivers to operational change.

Rationales may be connected to multiple elements across the business architecture, including:

  • Initiatives and Strategies that require justification.

  • Policies, Capabilities, and Value Streams being introduced or adjusted.

  • Performance goals or KPIs in the Performance domain.

Rationale object

Each response includes a rationale object that captures the justification for action. It replaces previous references to rationaleId and allows richer traceability and reasoning.

Field

Description

rationaleTitle

A short name for the rationale

description

A detailed explanation of the reasoning behind the response

driverType

Categorises the driver (e.g. Regulatory, Risk, Market, Insight)

sourceDocument

Reference to the originating insight, regulation, or analysis

relatedKPIs

KPIs that the response is intended to influence or improve

priorityLevel

(Optional) Indicates urgency or importance (e.g. High, Medium, Low)

Relationship to strategic response model

Each rationale is categorised by a Driver Type, which is derived from the Strategic Response Model. This provides a consistent basis for understanding and classifying business responses across the organisation.

Strategic Response Model drivers

The Strategic Response Model defines the following categories of drivers:

Driver Type

Description

Common Triggers

Example Rationales

Related Domains

Regulatory change

Changes in legal or regulatory requirements

New legislation, audits

Align with safety standards; address compliance risks

Policy, Initiatives, Capabilities, Performance

Customer demand shift

Shifting customer expectations or behaviours

Feedback, usage patterns

Improve onboarding; redesign mobile services

Strategy, ValueStream, Capabilities, Stakeholders

Operational risk

Threats to continuity or operational efficiency

System failure, safety incidents

Enhance cyber resilience; strengthen recovery plans

Capabilities, Performance, Information, Organisation

Technology obsolescence

Legacy or unsupported systems impacting operations

End-of-life systems, innovation lag

Modernise tech stack; enable data interoperability

Information, Capabilities, Initiatives

Cost pressure

Financial constraints requiring efficiency or cost optimisation

Budget cuts, benchmarking

Consolidate platforms; automate manual processes

Performance, Capabilities, Initiatives, Organisation

Workforce change

Evolving workforce dynamics

Hybrid work, attrition

Reskill staff; adapt HR policies

Organisation, Policy, Capabilities

Stakeholder expectation

Pressure or concern from internal or external stakeholders

Board expectations, ESG concerns

Increase transparency; implement ethical compliance

Stakeholders, Policy, Performance

Market opportunity

New market trends or emerging business opportunities

Competitor gap, new segment demand

Launch services; localise products

Strategy, ValueStream, Capabilities, Initiatives

Implementation guidance

  • Classification: Each rationale must include a driver type. Multiple drivers may be selected if appropriate.

  • Traceability: Rationales should link to the relevant strategy, initiative, or performance goal.

  • Consistency: Use the Strategic Response Model trigger catalogue to guide classification.

See: Examples of Trigger and Rationale links

How rationales are formed in response to specific triggers

Rationales are formed by analysing the implications of a specific trigger—whether external (e.g. regulatory change, market shift) or internal (e.g. performance trend, operational failure)—and articulating the reasoning behind a proposed strategic response. Each rationale provides the logical and contextual justification for why a response is appropriate, necessary, or valuable. This step bridges the gap between situational awareness (the trigger) and deliberate action (the response), ensuring decisions are traceable, defensible, and aligned with organisational goals.

By linking a rationale to its originating trigger, organisations can ensure transparency in decision-making, assess the consistency of responses over time, and identify patterns that inform future strategic planning. Rationales also provide auditability for governance, especially when responses involve major investments or policy changes.

Rationale JSON schema

{
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
"title": "Rationale Schema",
"description": "Schema for a Rationale object used in the Strategic Response Model to explain the reasoning behind strategic responses",
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"rationaleTitle": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Title or summary of the rationale"
},
"description": {
"type": "string",
"description": "A detailed explanation of the rationale supporting a strategic response"
},
"trigger": {
"$ref": "https://orthogramic.com/schemas/trigger.schema.json ",
"description": "Trigger object that prompted this rationale, defined according to the Trigger schema"
},
"linkedDomains": {
"type": "array",
"description": "List of business architecture domains influenced or justified by this rationale",
"items": {
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"Strategy",
"Capabilities",
"Initiatives",
"Policy",
"Information",
"Performance",
"Products",
"Services",
"Stakeholder",
"Value Stream"
]
}
},
"classification": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Optional category for the rationale (e.g. risk mitigation, compliance, opportunity, mandate)",
"enum": [
"Risk",
"Compliance",
"Opportunity",
"Mandate",
"Performance Insight",
"Stakeholder Need",
"Other"
]
},
"dateCreated": {
"type": "string",
"format": "date",
"description": "The date the rationale was first recorded"
},
"author": {
"type": "string",
"description": "The person or team who documented the rationale"
},
"orgUnitTitle": {
"type": "string",
"description": "The organisational unit that owns or authored the rationale"
}
},
"required": [
"rationaleTitle",
"description",
"trigger"
]
}

  • No labels