Strategy
Overview
The Strategy domain defines the organization's long-term vision, goals, and priorities that guide efforts to achieve mission and connect aspirations to actionable initiatives. It provides a structured framework for strategic planning, execution, and performance monitoring across the enterprise.
The domain emphasizes performance integration with KPIs embedded directly into strategic objectives, enables data-driven insights for rapid scenario analysis and strategic planning, and supports agile response capabilities to model different scenarios and respond with agility to changing conditions.
Schema Version: 2.2
Last Updated: July 2025
What is Strategy?
Strategy represents the deliberate choices about how to achieve objectives through coordinated actions and resource allocation across any domain of organized human activity. It encompasses the direction, scope, and priorities that guide decision-making and resource deployment to achieve desired outcomes, whether in business, military, political, diplomatic, economic, or social contexts.
Strategy is fundamentally about power - how to acquire it, maintain it, project it, or counter it. This applies across all realms from corporate boardrooms to battlefields, from political campaigns to international diplomacy, from economic competition to social movements.
Core Components
The Strategy domain includes essential elements that work together to provide comprehensive strategic management:
Strategy Objectives: Specific measurable targets that support strategic goals and provide clear direction for execution
Strategy Attributes
Attribute | Type | Description | Example | Required |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| String | Name/title of strategy | "Predictive Track Maintenance Program", "Digital Transformation Strategy" | ✓ |
| String | Detailed explanation | "Implementation of AI-powered track defect prediction system" | ✓ |
| String | Intended function | "Reduce track-related accidents by 35% through early detection" | ✓ |
| String | Responsible individual/team | "Director of Track Technology Innovation" | ✓ |
| String | Most closely linked organizational units | "Technology Innovation Division" |
|
| Enum | Broad categorization of strategy type |
|
|
| Enum | Specific type of strategy |
|
|
| Enum | Primary focus area |
|
|
| Enum | Strategy time frame |
|
|
| Enum | Organizational scope |
|
|
| String | Specific measurable targets | "Deploy sensors on 85% of mainline track by 2026" |
|
| String | Critical implementation actions | "Sensor installation, data integration, model development" |
|
| String | Allocated resources | "$145M budget, 23 technical staff, 4 AI systems" |
|
| String | Achievement timeline | "36 months: 2024-2026" |
|
| String | Success metrics | "Defect prediction accuracy: 92%, False positive: 3%" |
|
| String | Required dependencies | "Track geometry systems, weather monitoring network" |
|
| String | Related/linked strategies | "Digital Track Inspection, Rail Stress Monitoring" |
|
| String | Associated risks | "Sensor reliability in extreme weather, data quality issues" |
|
| Array[Enum] | Categories of risks | [ |
|
| String | Risk mitigation approaches | "Redundant sensor deployment, enhanced data validation" |
|
| String | Enhancement areas | "Expand to Class II railroads, integrate with PTC systems" |
|
| String | Goal alignment | "Directly supports 25% accident reduction goal" |
|
| String | Supporting business goal | "Reduce unplanned track maintenance by 40%" |
|
| String | How strategy creates competitive advantage | "Industry-leading predictive maintenance capabilities" |
|
| Enum | Desired market position |
|
|
| Enum | Required investment level |
|
|
| String | Criteria for measuring success | "25% reduction in track-related incidents, ROI > 15%" |
|
| String | Impact on key stakeholders | "Improved safety for passengers, reduced costs for operators" |
|
| String | Change management approach | "Phased rollout with extensive training and communication" |
|
| String | Parent strategy | "FRA Technology Modernization Plan" |
|
| String | Child strategy | "Rail Temperature Monitoring Strategy" |
|
| Array[Object] | Specific objectives supporting the strategy | See Strategy Objective Elements below |
|
Enhanced Enumeration Values
Strategy Category (strategyCategory)
Value | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Armed forces and defense strategy | Defensive positioning, offensive operations, deterrence |
| Political power and governance strategy | Electoral campaigns, coalition building, policy implementation |
| International relations and negotiation | Treaty negotiations, alliance building, conflict resolution |
| Economic competition and development | Market manipulation, trade wars, economic sanctions |
| Information gathering and covert operations | Espionage, counterintelligence, information warfare |
| Business and commercial strategy | Market expansion, competitive positioning, M&A |
| Nation-state power projection | Sphere of influence expansion, regional dominance |
| Social and cultural change strategy | Protest movements, advocacy campaigns, revolution |
| Technology development and control | Innovation races, technology transfer, cyber warfare |
| Control of critical resources | Energy dominance, supply chain control, resource denial |
| Control of narrative and information | Propaganda, media influence, psychological operations |
| Legal and regulatory strategy | Lawfare, judicial appointments, regulatory capture |
Strategy Type (strategyType)
Value | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Aggressive action to gain advantage | Military assault, hostile takeover, aggressive expansion |
| Protecting existing position or assets | Fortification, market defense, defensive alliances |
| Limiting opponent's expansion or influence | Cold War containment, competitive blocking |
| Preventing action through threat of consequences | Nuclear deterrence, economic sanctions threat |
| Wearing down opponent over time | Guerrilla warfare, price wars, sustained pressure |
| Rapid, overwhelming action | Lightning military campaigns, market disruption |
| Using unconventional means against stronger opponent | Terrorism, guerrilla tactics, cyber warfare |
| Creating alliances for collective action | Military alliances, political coalitions, trade blocs |
| Splitting opposition to weaken them | Political fragmentation, market segmentation |
| Surrounding and isolating the target | Military encirclement, economic isolation |
| Gradual penetration and subversion | Political infiltration, market penetration, espionage |
| Denying resources to opponent | Destroying assets during retreat, price dumping |
| Attacking from unexpected direction | Military flanking, market disruption from new angle |
| Acting first to prevent opponent action | Preemptive strike, first-mover advantage |
| Gradually increasing pressure or stakes | Military escalation, trade war escalation |
| Reducing tension and conflict | Diplomatic negotiations, peace processes |
| Deliberately provoking reaction | False flag operations, market manipulation |
| Misleading opponent about intentions | Military feints, disinformation campaigns |
| Building power or resources over time | Arms buildup, market share accumulation |
| Breaking existing systems or order | Revolutionary movements, disruptive innovation |
| Strategic retreat from position | Military withdrawal, market exit, policy reversal |
| Consolidating to core assets/positions | Empire contraction, business downsizing, budget cuts |
| Managed transfer of power or control | Decolonization, corporate succession, regime change |
| Complete cessation of involvement | Territory abandonment, market abandonment |
| Concessions to avoid conflict | Diplomatic concessions, competitive accommodation |
| Surrender or complete submission | Military surrender, merger acceptance |
Strategic Focus (strategicFocus)
Value | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Building and concentrating power | Political control, military superiority, market dominance |
| Maintaining existing power position | Status quo maintenance, defensive positioning |
| Managed transition of power | Decolonization, succession planning, negotiated handovers |
| Strategic reduction of commitments | Imperial retrenchment, divestiture, downsizing |
| Controlling geographic or market space | Territorial expansion, market control, sphere of influence |
| Strategic territorial retreat | Decolonization, market exit, border adjustments |
| Controlling critical resources | Energy control, supply chain dominance, talent acquisition |
| Preventing opponent access to resources | Economic sanctions, blockades, trade restrictions |
| Controlling narrative and intelligence | Media control, propaganda, intelligence gathering |
| Creating partnerships and coalitions | Military alliances, political coalitions, business partnerships |
| Strategic ending of partnerships | Treaty withdrawal, partnership termination |
| Weakening or eliminating opposition | Military defeat, political destruction, competitive elimination |
| Preventing or minimizing conflict | Diplomacy, appeasement, strategic concessions |
| Breaking existing order or systems | Revolutionary change, market disruption, regime change |
| Preserving existing order | Conservative politics, defensive positioning, stability |
| Extending reach and impact | Soft power, cultural influence, diplomatic pressure |
| Reducing involvement and commitments | Isolationism, disengagement, non-interference |
| Basic survival and persistence | Existential defense, crisis management, adaptation |
| Establishing dominant leadership | Regional hegemony, market leadership, cultural dominance |
| Establishing rightful authority | Democratic mandate, legal authority, moral leadership |
| Leading through new capabilities | Technological superiority, tactical innovation |
| Controlling economic systems | Trade dominance, financial control, economic sanctions |
| Shaping values and beliefs | Ideological influence, cultural export, education control |
Time Horizon (timeHorizon)
Value | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Immediate tactical strategies | Annual operational improvements |
| Medium-term strategic initiatives | Technology implementation projects |
| Long-term strategic direction | Major transformation programs |
| Extended strategic vision | Generational technology shifts |
Scope Level (scopeLevel)
Value | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Worldwide scope and impact | Global military operations, international diplomacy |
| Continent-wide strategy | European integration, Asia-Pacific strategy |
| Multi-national regional focus | Middle East strategy, Latin America policy |
| Single nation strategy | National defense, domestic policy |
| Sub-national government level | State politics, provincial governance |
| City or community level | Municipal politics, local campaigns |
| Industry or sector-wide | Defense sector, energy sector strategy |
| Single organization scope | Corporate strategy, military unit strategy |
| Multi-party alliance scope | Military coalition, political alliance |
| Two-party relationship | Bilateral treaty, trade agreement |
| Multiple parties involved | UN operations, trade bloc strategy |
| Different levels of power/scope | Guerrilla vs conventional forces, startup vs corporation |
Market Position (marketPosition)
Value | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Dominant market position | Largest market share, industry leader |
| Strong competitive position | Second-tier player challenging leader |
| Following market trends | Adapting to leader strategies |
| Specialized market focus |
The Orthogramic Metamodel license: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0), ensuring it remains open, collaborative, and widely accessible.